東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Are Strength Based Positive Interven...

Bates-Krakoff, Justine.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Are Strength Based Positive Interventions Effective in Eliciting Positive Behavioral Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Review.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Are Strength Based Positive Interventions Effective in Eliciting Positive Behavioral Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Review./
作者:	Bates-Krakoff, Justine.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	74 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-05B.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22624001
ISBN:	9781687945662

Are Strength Based Positive Interventions Effective in Eliciting Positive Behavioral Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Review.
Bates-Krakoff, Justine.

Are Strength Based Positive Interventions Effective in Eliciting Positive Behavioral Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Review. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 74 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.

Thesis (Psy.D.)--Fairleigh Dickinson University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Recent research on the effectiveness of strengths-based positive interventions (SBPIs) has focused on experiential outcomes such as depression and subjective well-being. Though such interventions have been suggested as an alternative to more traditional techniques that focus on deficit reduction, less is known about the effectiveness of these interventions for eliciting positive behavioral outcomes. The current meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of evaluating the extent how well SBPIs perform as methods of directly eliciting positive behavioral changes. A lengthy list of terms that could potentially indicate a focus on a personal strength was developed, and a systematic literature search was conducted using the PsycINFO, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases spanning all records from initiation of the database until February 2018. Twenty-three analyses were available across 17 articles that examined group differences in what was deemed a behavioral outcome. An analysis of pre-test data suggested that there was no difference between groups, mean g = -0.03. At post-test, the studies on average yielded a small, statistically significant effect size on average, g = 0.22, p = .02, 95% CI = [ .03, .41]. This finding suggests that SBPIs were effective in eliciting small amounts of behavioral change relative to control conditions. However, there is currently no basis for drawing conclusions regarding when, and for whom, SBPIs may be most helpful. The number of studies included in the meta-analysis was small and indicates the need for more research to be conducted in this area. Future studies that examine the use of SBPIs should focus on behavioral outcomes, rather than or in addition to, affective experiences of depression and well-being.

ISBN: 9781687945662Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Behavioral Outcomes

Are Strength Based Positive Interventions Effective in Eliciting Positive Behavioral Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Review.
LDR:03170nmm a2200433 4500 001 2279856
005 20210823091359.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781687945662
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22624001
035 $a AAI22624001
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bates-Krakoff, Justine. $3 3558342
245 1 0 $a Are Strength Based Positive Interventions Effective in Eliciting Positive Behavioral Outcomes? A Meta-Analytic Review.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 74 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: McGrath, Robert.
502 $a Thesis (Psy.D.)--Fairleigh Dickinson University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a Recent research on the effectiveness of strengths-based positive interventions (SBPIs) has focused on experiential outcomes such as depression and subjective well-being. Though such interventions have been suggested as an alternative to more traditional techniques that focus on deficit reduction, less is known about the effectiveness of these interventions for eliciting positive behavioral outcomes. The current meta-analysis was conducted with the aim of evaluating the extent how well SBPIs perform as methods of directly eliciting positive behavioral changes. A lengthy list of terms that could potentially indicate a focus on a personal strength was developed, and a systematic literature search was conducted using the PsycINFO, Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases spanning all records from initiation of the database until February 2018. Twenty-three analyses were available across 17 articles that examined group differences in what was deemed a behavioral outcome. An analysis of pre-test data suggested that there was no difference between groups, mean g = -0.03. At post-test, the studies on average yielded a small, statistically significant effect size on average, g = 0.22, p = .02, 95% CI = [ .03, .41]. This finding suggests that SBPIs were effective in eliciting small amounts of behavioral change relative to control conditions. However, there is currently no basis for drawing conclusions regarding when, and for whom, SBPIs may be most helpful. The number of studies included in the meta-analysis was small and indicates the need for more research to be conducted in this area. Future studies that examine the use of SBPIs should focus on behavioral outcomes, rather than or in addition to, affective experiences of depression and well-being.
590 $a School code: 0287.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
650 4 $a Counseling psychology. $3 924824
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 2144733
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 534751
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 3168359
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
653 $a Behavioral Outcomes
653 $a Character Strengths
653 $a Meta-analysis
653 $a Positive Psychology
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0603
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0622
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a Fairleigh Dickinson University. $b Clinical Psychology. $3 3436787
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-05B.
790 $a 0287
791 $a Psy.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22624001