東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

The Pen or the Cursor: A Single-Subj...

Good, Kevin Edward.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Pen or the Cursor: A Single-Subject Comparison of a Paper-Based Graphic Organizer and a Computer-Based Graphic Organizer to Support the Persuasive Writing of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders or Mild Autism.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Pen or the Cursor: A Single-Subject Comparison of a Paper-Based Graphic Organizer and a Computer-Based Graphic Organizer to Support the Persuasive Writing of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders or Mild Autism./
Author:	Good, Kevin Edward.
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	374 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
Subject:	Language arts. -
Online resource:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13864282
ISBN:	9781392223499

The Pen or the Cursor: A Single-Subject Comparison of a Paper-Based Graphic Organizer and a Computer-Based Graphic Organizer to Support the Persuasive Writing of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders or Mild Autism.
Good, Kevin Edward.

The Pen or the Cursor: A Single-Subject Comparison of a Paper-Based Graphic Organizer and a Computer-Based Graphic Organizer to Support the Persuasive Writing of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders or Mild Autism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 374 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

A single-subject, combined multiple-baseline-across-participants and ABC study was conducted to examine the functional relation between a traditional paper-based graphic organizer (PBGO) and a computer-based graphic organizer (CBGO) with technological enhancements (audio-prompting comments and text-to-speech) intervention and the improvements in persuasive essay writing by upper elementary students. Participants for the study were four fourth and fifth-grade students with either an Emotional-Behavioral Disorder (EBD) or mild Autism in two socioeconomically disadvantaged rural schools. Dependent variables included total number of words written, number of sentences, number of transition words, and holistic writing quality of the overall essay. Students' engagement with the PBGO and CBGO, including the audio prompts and text-to-speech tools, was analyzed. The results indicated that students tended to engage with more parts of the CBGO than PBGO. Additionally, the results indicated that students were apt to utilize the technology enhancements in the CBGO. Visual analysis of data and calculations of effect sizes using PND and PEM were completed. The analyses indicated no evidence of a functional relation between the PBGO intervention and all the measures and moderate evidence of a functional relation between the CBGO intervention and all the measures. Social validity of the PBGO and CBGO was assessed at the end of the study through semi-structured student interviews and analyzed using qualitative analysis. Most students reported finding the computer-based graphic organizer (CBGO) intervention more helpful than the paper-based graphic organizer (PBGO) and shared positive perceptions of the CBGO and use of audio prompts. Implications, limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

ISBN: 9781392223499Subjects--Topical Terms:

532624
Language arts.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Autism spectrum disorder

The Pen or the Cursor: A Single-Subject Comparison of a Paper-Based Graphic Organizer and a Computer-Based Graphic Organizer to Support the Persuasive Writing of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders or Mild Autism.
LDR:03326nmm a2200421 4500 001 2279816
005 20210823091350.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392223499
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13864282
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gmu:11980
035 $a AAI13864282
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Good, Kevin Edward. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-9613-0296 $3 3558293
245 1 4 $a The Pen or the Cursor: A Single-Subject Comparison of a Paper-Based Graphic Organizer and a Computer-Based Graphic Organizer to Support the Persuasive Writing of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders or Mild Autism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 374 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Evmenova, Anna S.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a A single-subject, combined multiple-baseline-across-participants and ABC study was conducted to examine the functional relation between a traditional paper-based graphic organizer (PBGO) and a computer-based graphic organizer (CBGO) with technological enhancements (audio-prompting comments and text-to-speech) intervention and the improvements in persuasive essay writing by upper elementary students. Participants for the study were four fourth and fifth-grade students with either an Emotional-Behavioral Disorder (EBD) or mild Autism in two socioeconomically disadvantaged rural schools. Dependent variables included total number of words written, number of sentences, number of transition words, and holistic writing quality of the overall essay. Students' engagement with the PBGO and CBGO, including the audio prompts and text-to-speech tools, was analyzed. The results indicated that students tended to engage with more parts of the CBGO than PBGO. Additionally, the results indicated that students were apt to utilize the technology enhancements in the CBGO. Visual analysis of data and calculations of effect sizes using PND and PEM were completed. The analyses indicated no evidence of a functional relation between the PBGO intervention and all the measures and moderate evidence of a functional relation between the CBGO intervention and all the measures. Social validity of the PBGO and CBGO was assessed at the end of the study through semi-structured student interviews and analyzed using qualitative analysis. Most students reported finding the computer-based graphic organizer (CBGO) intervention more helpful than the paper-based graphic organizer (PBGO) and shared positive perceptions of the CBGO and use of audio prompts. Implications, limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0883.
650 4 $a Language arts. $3 532624
650 4 $a Elementary education. $3 641385
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
653 $a Autism spectrum disorder
653 $a Computer-based graphic organizer
653 $a Emotional-behavioral disorders
653 $a Persuasive writing
653 $a Technology-based graphic organizer
653 $a Writing
690 $a 0279
690 $a 0524
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a George Mason University. $b Education. $3 2095189
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0883
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13864282