東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effects of Type of Written Corre...

DeRobles, Gabriela.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Type of Written Corrective Feedback and Level of Proficiency on Processing and Accuracy in Heritage Language Learners of Spanish.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Type of Written Corrective Feedback and Level of Proficiency on Processing and Accuracy in Heritage Language Learners of Spanish./
作者:	DeRobles, Gabriela.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	229 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-04A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13899079
ISBN:	9781088303443

The Effects of Type of Written Corrective Feedback and Level of Proficiency on Processing and Accuracy in Heritage Language Learners of Spanish.
DeRobles, Gabriela.

The Effects of Type of Written Corrective Feedback and Level of Proficiency on Processing and Accuracy in Heritage Language Learners of Spanish. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 229 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In the field of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (ISLA), written corrective feedback (WCF) has been shown to play a facilitative role in improving written accuracy (e.g., Ashwell, 2000; Ferris & Roberts, 2001; Ferris, 2006; Sheen, 2007; Bitchener, 2008; Liu & Brown, 2015). However, studies that examine the effects of different types of feedback (which vary in explicitness) on L2 learning have yielded inconclusive findings (e.g., Chandler, 2003; Van Beuningen, De Jong, & Kuiken, 2008; Benson & DeKeyser, 2018).Traditionally, the literature in this area of research has focused solely on L2 foreign language learners or English as a second language learners with little attention to heritage language learners (HLLs). While there is growing interest in HLLs, and particularly in how they can be supported to develop their academic writing skills in the HL, an area of particular vulnerability for HLLs, whether type of feedback provided exerts influence on their written accuracy over time, remains understudied, and therefore, not well understood. In addition, this dissertation not only explores the efficacy of WCF on the improved accuracy of HLLs on errors relating to mood, aspect, and orthography, but also the extent to which the learner's proficiency may moderate the effects of different types of feedback. Furthermore, this study investigates the role of depth of processing (DOP) on subsequent language development via the use of think aloud (TA) protocols.The purpose of this study is three-fold: 1) compare the accuracy scores of HLLs at high and very high proficiency levels resulting from indirect (i.e., error code corrections) or direct (i.e., full reformulation of the error) feedback on a composition, 2) gather concurrent data on how HLLs at high and very high proficiency levels process types of WCF, and 3) investigate the relationship between DOP, types of feedback, and language proficiency and the effects these relationships may have on learning outcomes. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions (direct WCF+ TA or indirect WCF+TA) or the control (no feedback) condition. All participants completed an untimed semi-guided writing task (Draft 1). They revised their compositions using their respective feedback, and a week later, they wrote a second composition on a similar topic (Draft 2).The results showed that at both proficiency levels (High and Very High), both direct and indirect WCF groups significantly outperformed the control group. However, for learners with lower proficiency, providing direct feedback on subjunctive and orthographic errors led to higher accuracy. The qualitative data revealed that HLLs in both proficiency groups used explicit metalinguistic knowledge as well as their implicit non-metalinguistic knowledge of their HL (i.e., intuition) when revising orthographic and grammatical errors. Regarding the relationship between the type of WCF and DOP, both feedback types (i.e., direct and indirect) elicited similar levels of DOP (i.e., low, medium, and high). However, differences were observed when proficiency was taken into consideration. Finally, there was a positive relationship between deeper levels of processing and improved accuracy from Draft 1 to Draft 2, particularly for the indirect WCF group.

ISBN: 9781088303443Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Depth of processing

The Effects of Type of Written Corrective Feedback and Level of Proficiency on Processing and Accuracy in Heritage Language Learners of Spanish.
LDR:04561nmm a2200349 4500 001 2279495
005 20210823080230.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781088303443
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13899079
035 $a AAI13899079
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a DeRobles, Gabriela. $0 (orcid)0000-0003-0705-5357 $3 3557953
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Type of Written Corrective Feedback and Level of Proficiency on Processing and Accuracy in Heritage Language Learners of Spanish.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 229 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Leow, Ronald.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a In the field of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (ISLA), written corrective feedback (WCF) has been shown to play a facilitative role in improving written accuracy (e.g., Ashwell, 2000; Ferris & Roberts, 2001; Ferris, 2006; Sheen, 2007; Bitchener, 2008; Liu & Brown, 2015). However, studies that examine the effects of different types of feedback (which vary in explicitness) on L2 learning have yielded inconclusive findings (e.g., Chandler, 2003; Van Beuningen, De Jong, & Kuiken, 2008; Benson & DeKeyser, 2018).Traditionally, the literature in this area of research has focused solely on L2 foreign language learners or English as a second language learners with little attention to heritage language learners (HLLs). While there is growing interest in HLLs, and particularly in how they can be supported to develop their academic writing skills in the HL, an area of particular vulnerability for HLLs, whether type of feedback provided exerts influence on their written accuracy over time, remains understudied, and therefore, not well understood. In addition, this dissertation not only explores the efficacy of WCF on the improved accuracy of HLLs on errors relating to mood, aspect, and orthography, but also the extent to which the learner's proficiency may moderate the effects of different types of feedback. Furthermore, this study investigates the role of depth of processing (DOP) on subsequent language development via the use of think aloud (TA) protocols.The purpose of this study is three-fold: 1) compare the accuracy scores of HLLs at high and very high proficiency levels resulting from indirect (i.e., error code corrections) or direct (i.e., full reformulation of the error) feedback on a composition, 2) gather concurrent data on how HLLs at high and very high proficiency levels process types of WCF, and 3) investigate the relationship between DOP, types of feedback, and language proficiency and the effects these relationships may have on learning outcomes. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two experimental conditions (direct WCF+ TA or indirect WCF+TA) or the control (no feedback) condition. All participants completed an untimed semi-guided writing task (Draft 1). They revised their compositions using their respective feedback, and a week later, they wrote a second composition on a similar topic (Draft 2).The results showed that at both proficiency levels (High and Very High), both direct and indirect WCF groups significantly outperformed the control group. However, for learners with lower proficiency, providing direct feedback on subjunctive and orthographic errors led to higher accuracy. The qualitative data revealed that HLLs in both proficiency groups used explicit metalinguistic knowledge as well as their implicit non-metalinguistic knowledge of their HL (i.e., intuition) when revising orthographic and grammatical errors. Regarding the relationship between the type of WCF and DOP, both feedback types (i.e., direct and indirect) elicited similar levels of DOP (i.e., low, medium, and high). However, differences were observed when proficiency was taken into consideration. Finally, there was a positive relationship between deeper levels of processing and improved accuracy from Draft 1 to Draft 2, particularly for the indirect WCF group.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a English as a second language--ESL. $3 3423990
653 $a Depth of processing
653 $a Heritage language learners
653 $a Proficiency
653 $a Written corrective feedback
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Spanish & Portuguese. $3 1037986
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-04A.
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13899079