語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Perceived Accuracy of Doctor of Phys...
~
Porter, Tracy.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Perceived Accuracy of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students' Self-Assessment Using Two Clinical Performance Assessment Tools.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Perceived Accuracy of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students' Self-Assessment Using Two Clinical Performance Assessment Tools./
作者:
Porter, Tracy.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:
115 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International82-01B.
標題:
Physical therapy. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27997443
ISBN:
9798617069008
Perceived Accuracy of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students' Self-Assessment Using Two Clinical Performance Assessment Tools.
Porter, Tracy.
Perceived Accuracy of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students' Self-Assessment Using Two Clinical Performance Assessment Tools.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 115 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: B.
Thesis (Ed.D.)--Concordia University (Oregon), 2020.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
Clinical education plays an important role in entry-level, doctoral training for physical therapists. While completing clinical education experiences, Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students self-assess clinical performance and are also assessed by their assigned clinical instructors. Student self-assessment accuracy has not been widely studied in DPT education in the United States. Insight into DPT student self-assessment patterns is needed to inform best practice in DPT clinical performance assessment. The National Consortium of Clinical Educators identified the need to study clinical performance assessment tools for DPT clinical education. This study investigated the perceived accuracy of student self-assessment of clinical performance in DPT education as measured by two assessment tools and congruence with clinical instructor ratings. Guided by adult learning theory, this quasi-experimental, quantitative design compared DPT student self-assessment accuracy between the Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PTCPI) and the Clinical Internship Evaluation Tool (CIET). The manipulated independent variable was the clinical performance assessment tool. Subjects were not randomly assigned to groups, but assigned based on cohort. The clinical performance assessment tool utilized by the control group represented the current assessment standard for DPT education. Results revealed DPT student were accurate in self-assessment of clinical performance in all but the control group PTCPI final evaluation (n = 52). At the final assessment, DPT students in the control group rated themselves significantly lower than their clinical instructors. Student self-ratings in the experimental group were congruent with clinical instructor ratings at midterm and final (n = 51). There was improved DPT student self-assessment accuracy observed in the experimental group evaluated using the CIET.
ISBN: 9798617069008Subjects--Topical Terms:
588713
Physical therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Clinical performance assessment
Perceived Accuracy of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students' Self-Assessment Using Two Clinical Performance Assessment Tools.
LDR
:03034nmm a2200325 4500
001
2279074
005
20210730131535.5
008
220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798617069008
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI27997443
035
$a
AAI27997443
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Porter, Tracy.
$3
3557488
245
1 0
$a
Perceived Accuracy of Doctor of Physical Therapy Students' Self-Assessment Using Two Clinical Performance Assessment Tools.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2020
300
$a
115 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Graham, Donna.
502
$a
Thesis (Ed.D.)--Concordia University (Oregon), 2020.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
Clinical education plays an important role in entry-level, doctoral training for physical therapists. While completing clinical education experiences, Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students self-assess clinical performance and are also assessed by their assigned clinical instructors. Student self-assessment accuracy has not been widely studied in DPT education in the United States. Insight into DPT student self-assessment patterns is needed to inform best practice in DPT clinical performance assessment. The National Consortium of Clinical Educators identified the need to study clinical performance assessment tools for DPT clinical education. This study investigated the perceived accuracy of student self-assessment of clinical performance in DPT education as measured by two assessment tools and congruence with clinical instructor ratings. Guided by adult learning theory, this quasi-experimental, quantitative design compared DPT student self-assessment accuracy between the Physical Therapist Clinical Performance Instrument (PTCPI) and the Clinical Internship Evaluation Tool (CIET). The manipulated independent variable was the clinical performance assessment tool. Subjects were not randomly assigned to groups, but assigned based on cohort. The clinical performance assessment tool utilized by the control group represented the current assessment standard for DPT education. Results revealed DPT student were accurate in self-assessment of clinical performance in all but the control group PTCPI final evaluation (n = 52). At the final assessment, DPT students in the control group rated themselves significantly lower than their clinical instructors. Student self-ratings in the experimental group were congruent with clinical instructor ratings at midterm and final (n = 51). There was improved DPT student self-assessment accuracy observed in the experimental group evaluated using the CIET.
590
$a
School code: 1845.
650
4
$a
Physical therapy.
$3
588713
650
4
$a
Higher education.
$3
641065
653
$a
Clinical performance assessment
653
$a
Physical therapy education
690
$a
0382
690
$a
0745
710
2
$a
Concordia University (Oregon).
$b
Education.
$3
3341895
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
82-01B.
790
$a
1845
791
$a
Ed.D.
792
$a
2020
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27997443
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9430807
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入