東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effect of Implicit and Explicit ...

Xue, Yuyan.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Semiartificial L2 Learning on Motion Event Conceptualization: Recognition Memory and Similarity Judgment.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Semiartificial L2 Learning on Motion Event Conceptualization: Recognition Memory and Similarity Judgment./
作者:	Xue, Yuyan.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	86 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-06.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28154527
ISBN:	9798691282676

The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Semiartificial L2 Learning on Motion Event Conceptualization: Recognition Memory and Similarity Judgment.
Xue, Yuyan.

The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Semiartificial L2 Learning on Motion Event Conceptualization: Recognition Memory and Similarity Judgment. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 86 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.

Thesis (M.Phil.)--University of Cambridge, Trinity College (United Kingdom), 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This study trained participants with no prior Verb-framed language knowledge on a semiartificial L2 consisting of English lexicon and motion event lexicalization rules based on Uyghur the Satellite-framed language in either implicit or explicit manner. The main research questions were: whether learning this semiartificial L2 in implicit and explicit manner would lead to different L2 learning effects and different motion event conceptualization patterns; whether the effect on motion event conceptualization patterns was mediated by L2 learning effect and/or moderated by motion event encoding conditions (free versus verbal encoding). There were two target L2 rules for learning: a non-adjacent dependency rule between Uyghur dative/ablative case markers and motion event Path types, and a form-meaning mapping rule that mapped motion event Path and Manner onto the main verb and converb respectively. The implicit group was exposed to 120 L2 sentences and were asked to do semantic plausibility judgment and dative/ablative case marker recall after each sentence; the explicit group was provided with metalinguistic explanations of the two rules and were exposed to another 87 L2 sentences while attending to how the sentences conformed to the two rules and doing the same semantic plausibility judgment and case marker recall tasks. Motion event conceptualization pattern was measured using video-based recognition memory and similarity judgment tasks. L2 grammaticality judgment test showed that the L2 training only brought overall L2 learning effect in the explicit group who acquired some rule knowledge; while the implicit group very likely only memorized chunks formed by adjacent elements without generalizing or acquiring any rules. Regarding the relationship between L2 learning and non-linguistic motion event conceptualization, the only L2-specific effect found was that under verbal encoding, the explicit group showed significantly poorer recognition memory than the control group when Path was different between the target and alternative motion events. This effect was not mediated by overall L2 learning effect. This finding suggested that, after semiartificial L2 training, the explicit group's memory of the core of the L2 lexicalization pattern may be less resilient to distraction than the memory of the detail of the L2 lexicalization pattern. The absence of L2-specific effects in motion event conceptualization in the implicit group suggested that mere L2 chunk memorization may not be sufficient to be transmitted into shifts in non-linguistic conceptualization pattern.

ISBN: 9798691282676Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Explicit learning

The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Semiartificial L2 Learning on Motion Event Conceptualization: Recognition Memory and Similarity Judgment.
LDR:03912nmm a2200397 4500 001 2278126
005 20210611082028.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798691282676
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28154527
035 $a AAI28154527
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Xue, Yuyan. $3 3556493
245 1 4 $a The Effect of Implicit and Explicit Semiartificial L2 Learning on Motion Event Conceptualization: Recognition Memory and Similarity Judgment.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 86 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.
500 $a Advisor: Williams, John N.
502 $a Thesis (M.Phil.)--University of Cambridge, Trinity College (United Kingdom), 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This study trained participants with no prior Verb-framed language knowledge on a semiartificial L2 consisting of English lexicon and motion event lexicalization rules based on Uyghur the Satellite-framed language in either implicit or explicit manner. The main research questions were: whether learning this semiartificial L2 in implicit and explicit manner would lead to different L2 learning effects and different motion event conceptualization patterns; whether the effect on motion event conceptualization patterns was mediated by L2 learning effect and/or moderated by motion event encoding conditions (free versus verbal encoding). There were two target L2 rules for learning: a non-adjacent dependency rule between Uyghur dative/ablative case markers and motion event Path types, and a form-meaning mapping rule that mapped motion event Path and Manner onto the main verb and converb respectively. The implicit group was exposed to 120 L2 sentences and were asked to do semantic plausibility judgment and dative/ablative case marker recall after each sentence; the explicit group was provided with metalinguistic explanations of the two rules and were exposed to another 87 L2 sentences while attending to how the sentences conformed to the two rules and doing the same semantic plausibility judgment and case marker recall tasks. Motion event conceptualization pattern was measured using video-based recognition memory and similarity judgment tasks. L2 grammaticality judgment test showed that the L2 training only brought overall L2 learning effect in the explicit group who acquired some rule knowledge; while the implicit group very likely only memorized chunks formed by adjacent elements without generalizing or acquiring any rules. Regarding the relationship between L2 learning and non-linguistic motion event conceptualization, the only L2-specific effect found was that under verbal encoding, the explicit group showed significantly poorer recognition memory than the control group when Path was different between the target and alternative motion events. This effect was not mediated by overall L2 learning effect. This finding suggested that, after semiartificial L2 training, the explicit group's memory of the core of the L2 lexicalization pattern may be less resilient to distraction than the memory of the detail of the L2 lexicalization pattern. The absence of L2-specific effects in motion event conceptualization in the implicit group suggested that mere L2 chunk memorization may not be sufficient to be transmitted into shifts in non-linguistic conceptualization pattern.
590 $a School code: 8032.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Foreign language learning. $3 3436780
653 $a Explicit learning
653 $a Implicit learning
653 $a Linguistic relativity
653 $a Motion event
653 $a Semi-artificial language
653 $a Verb-framed language
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0679
690 $a 0444
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a University of Cambridge, Trinity College (United Kingdom). $b Linguistics. $3 3556494
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-06.
790 $a 8032
791 $a M.Phil.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28154527