東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The School-Family Relationship and S...

Scott, Clay.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The School-Family Relationship and Student Benefits.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The School-Family Relationship and Student Benefits./
作者:	Scott, Clay.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	238 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-04A.
標題:	Education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28150914
ISBN:	9798684671500

The School-Family Relationship and Student Benefits.
Scott, Clay.

The School-Family Relationship and Student Benefits. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 238 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Parent engagement is recognized as valuable to a child's education (Epstein, 2016; Henderson & Mapp, 2002). A potentially important piece of the school-family relationship that has not been studied is the degree to which schools and families agree philosophically and thus project consistent messages to children. To explore philosophical agreement, this case study examined the experience of a single classical school. A cross case design has been selected for its benefits in investigating previously unexamined causal paths or relationships (George & Bennett, 2005).Data collection and analysis occurred in two stages. The first stage included a survey of families. The main purposes of these data were to identify crucial cases (George & Bennett, 2005) and to provide the foundation for the subsequent in-depth examination of those cases. In the second stage, document review, parent focus groups, and observations all provided data for a rich understanding of agreement at the academy.Results of the study did not demonstrate a connection between philosophical agreement and parent involvement or proximal conditions for student achievement. However, as an exploratory study, important questions were raised. The largest issue was the use of class level data. Individual results offset each other within each class such that differences in educational philosophy were masked. Philosophical neutrality, philosophical paradoxes, form of parent involvement, and form of student achievement were all identified as factors for future study on the topic.

ISBN: 9798684671500Subjects--Topical Terms:

516579
Education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Agreement

The School-Family Relationship and Student Benefits.
LDR:02713nmm a2200373 4500 001 2278116
005 20210611082025.5
008 220723s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798684671500
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28150914
035 $a AAI28150914
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Scott, Clay. $3 3556482
245 1 4 $a The School-Family Relationship and Student Benefits.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 238 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Dannels, Sharon.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Parent engagement is recognized as valuable to a child's education (Epstein, 2016; Henderson & Mapp, 2002). A potentially important piece of the school-family relationship that has not been studied is the degree to which schools and families agree philosophically and thus project consistent messages to children. To explore philosophical agreement, this case study examined the experience of a single classical school. A cross case design has been selected for its benefits in investigating previously unexamined causal paths or relationships (George & Bennett, 2005).Data collection and analysis occurred in two stages. The first stage included a survey of families. The main purposes of these data were to identify crucial cases (George & Bennett, 2005) and to provide the foundation for the subsequent in-depth examination of those cases. In the second stage, document review, parent focus groups, and observations all provided data for a rich understanding of agreement at the academy.Results of the study did not demonstrate a connection between philosophical agreement and parent involvement or proximal conditions for student achievement. However, as an exploratory study, important questions were raised. The largest issue was the use of class level data. Individual results offset each other within each class such that differences in educational philosophy were masked. Philosophical neutrality, philosophical paradoxes, form of parent involvement, and form of student achievement were all identified as factors for future study on the topic.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Educational philosophy. $3 3173367
653 $a Agreement
653 $a Classical education
653 $a Philosophy of education
653 $a School choice
653 $a School family relationship
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0635
690 $a 0998
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Educational Administration & Policy Studies. $3 3279659
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-04A.
790 $a 0075
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28150914