東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Rhetoric and Ethics of Free Speech D...

Lynch, K C.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Rhetoric and Ethics of Free Speech Discourse on Gab.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rhetoric and Ethics of Free Speech Discourse on Gab./
作者:	Lynch, K C.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	106 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-03.
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28002468
ISBN:	9798662580503

Rhetoric and Ethics of Free Speech Discourse on Gab.
Lynch, K C.

Rhetoric and Ethics of Free Speech Discourse on Gab. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 106 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Washington, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Gab is a social media platform that brands itself as a champion of free speech. Users engage in a variety of extremist speech, including arguments for free speech absolutism. I argue that if free speech arguments on Gab are allowed to play out to their logical ends, the ethical consequences will undermine not only the free speech rights Gabbers purport to love, but the foundations of liberal democracy on which those rights are based. This is a mixed methods study using contextual analysis to examine key exigencies of political correctness, trolling, Constitutional fundamentalism, and the candidacy and presidency of Donald Trump; danah boyd's ethnographic technique of "deep hanging out" to select representative textual samples; and Dana Cloud's theory of "frame-checking" to critique doxastic (belief-based) arguments presented in the samples and critique those arguments based on their ethical ends.

ISBN: 9798662580503Subjects--Topical Terms:

516647
Rhetoric.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Doxa

Rhetoric and Ethics of Free Speech Discourse on Gab.
LDR:01935nmm a2200349 4500 001 2278075
005 20210611082016.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798662580503
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28002468
035 $a AAI28002468
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lynch, K C. $3 3556438
245 1 0 $a Rhetoric and Ethics of Free Speech Discourse on Gab.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 106 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03.
500 $a Advisor: Harold, Christine.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Washington, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Gab is a social media platform that brands itself as a champion of free speech. Users engage in a variety of extremist speech, including arguments for free speech absolutism. I argue that if free speech arguments on Gab are allowed to play out to their logical ends, the ethical consequences will undermine not only the free speech rights Gabbers purport to love, but the foundations of liberal democracy on which those rights are based. This is a mixed methods study using contextual analysis to examine key exigencies of political correctness, trolling, Constitutional fundamentalism, and the candidacy and presidency of Donald Trump; danah boyd's ethnographic technique of "deep hanging out" to select representative textual samples; and Dana Cloud's theory of "frame-checking" to critique doxastic (belief-based) arguments presented in the samples and critique those arguments based on their ethical ends.
590 $a School code: 0250.
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
650 4 $a Ethics. $3 517264
653 $a Doxa
653 $a Free speech
653 $a Trolling
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0646
690 $a 0394
710 2 $a University of Washington. $b Communication. $3 3169545
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-03.
790 $a 0250
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28002468