東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Student-Centered and Small-Group Dis...

Ho, Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Student-Centered and Small-Group Discussion Approach to Supporting CER.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Student-Centered and Small-Group Discussion Approach to Supporting CER./
作者:	Ho, Michael.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	90 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-05.
標題:	Science education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27834647
ISBN:	9798678198594

Student-Centered and Small-Group Discussion Approach to Supporting CER.
Ho, Michael.

Student-Centered and Small-Group Discussion Approach to Supporting CER. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 90 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Student sensemaking at the high school level is a fast-growing practice in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Two contrasting teaching styles were compared, along with using sensemaking strategies within an NGSS lesson. The purpose of this research was to investigate any differences in student learning and preference between facilitating sensemaking discussion before or after a student-centered activity, such as a lab. In one group, students formulated their own procedure and data collection plan first, without having a whole class "building understanding" discussion as a group. The other group started the "building understanding discussion sensemaking" discussion before considering what investigation they would conduct or what evidence they would gather. Data collection included an open-ended pre and post assessment and a qualitative student survey. The Mann-Whitney independent variable statistical test found that there was a significant difference between the two teaching styles, and there is a significant improvement between the pre and post-assessment for the teaching style that has students explore the lab before creating a student data table. Further studies are needed to assess how sensemaking and NGSS can be more effective for students with special needs and how the two teaching styles can be compared between semesters.

ISBN: 9798678198594Subjects--Topical Terms:

521340
Science education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Data table

Student-Centered and Small-Group Discussion Approach to Supporting CER.
LDR:02533nmm a2200385 4500 001 2278017
005 20210611082004.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798678198594
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27834647
035 $a AAI27834647
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ho, Michael. $3 3342140
245 1 0 $a Student-Centered and Small-Group Discussion Approach to Supporting CER.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 90 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05.
500 $a Advisor: Gomez Zwiep, Susan.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Student sensemaking at the high school level is a fast-growing practice in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Two contrasting teaching styles were compared, along with using sensemaking strategies within an NGSS lesson. The purpose of this research was to investigate any differences in student learning and preference between facilitating sensemaking discussion before or after a student-centered activity, such as a lab. In one group, students formulated their own procedure and data collection plan first, without having a whole class "building understanding" discussion as a group. The other group started the "building understanding discussion sensemaking" discussion before considering what investigation they would conduct or what evidence they would gather. Data collection included an open-ended pre and post assessment and a qualitative student survey. The Mann-Whitney independent variable statistical test found that there was a significant difference between the two teaching styles, and there is a significant improvement between the pre and post-assessment for the teaching style that has students explore the lab before creating a student data table. Further studies are needed to assess how sensemaking and NGSS can be more effective for students with special needs and how the two teaching styles can be compared between semesters.
590 $a School code: 6080.
650 4 $a Science education. $3 521340
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 2122828
650 4 $a Secondary education. $3 2122779
653 $a Data table
653 $a Discussion
653 $a Failure
653 $a Next Generation Science Standards
653 $a Open inquiry
653 $a Sensemaking
690 $a 0714
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0533
710 2 $a California State University, Long Beach. $b Science Education. $3 2104151
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-05.
790 $a 6080
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27834647