東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

In-groups, Out-groups and the Challe...

Markle, Amy.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

In-groups, Out-groups and the Challenge of Increasing Diversity through Intentional Inclusion and Equity Practices: Exploring the Roles of Urban Land Managers, Affinity Groups, and Alaska Residents.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	In-groups, Out-groups and the Challenge of Increasing Diversity through Intentional Inclusion and Equity Practices: Exploring the Roles of Urban Land Managers, Affinity Groups, and Alaska Residents./
作者:	Markle, Amy.
其他作者:	Newton, Susan
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	424 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-04A.
標題:	Recreation. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22583557
ISBN:	9781088336328

In-groups, Out-groups and the Challenge of Increasing Diversity through Intentional Inclusion and Equity Practices: Exploring the Roles of Urban Land Managers, Affinity Groups, and Alaska Residents.
Markle, Amy.

In-groups, Out-groups and the Challenge of Increasing Diversity through Intentional Inclusion and Equity Practices: Exploring the Roles of Urban Land Managers, Affinity Groups, and Alaska Residents. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 424 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Missouri - Saint Louis, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Public lands belong to all of us. Yet, data indicate that some Americans are participating more than others in the decision-making processes that guide use, access, and availability of our public lands and resources. Three researchers investigated specific intersections of participation along the public decision-making process, with a focus on illuminating barriers to full public participation as well as potential bridges to increasing equitable inclusion. Researchers interviewed urban land managers and affinity group leaders, surveyed a sample of residents in Alaska, and examined public testimony from a city council discussion about an inclusion resolution in Homer, Alaska. Qualitative and quantitative analyses across these studies revealed that barriers prohibiting full participation can be grouped as either intra-barriers, which are seen within individuals, groups, or organizations, or as inter-barriers, which are seen between groups across society. Intra-barriers include difficulties such as lack of trust, deficient group representation, low familiarity with public lands, and shortage of resources. Inter-barriers involve lack of understanding of other cultures, groups, and agencies, and inconsistent priorities, policies, and mandates that drive efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in public lands and access to decision making. Bridges, or solutions, to these barriers can be grouped into five major categories: building and maintaining strong partnerships, increasing participant representation, strengthening ally capabilities, improving staff representation and cultural competency, and improving engagement strategies. The researchers conclude that the most direct path to increasing access to public decision making is to increase equity and inclusion in tandem. Increasing both the intentionality of inclusion and the practices of equity ultimately lead to measurably higher rates of actively diverse participants.

ISBN: 9781088336328Subjects--Topical Terms:

535376
Recreation.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Diversity

In-groups, Out-groups and the Challenge of Increasing Diversity through Intentional Inclusion and Equity Practices: Exploring the Roles of Urban Land Managers, Affinity Groups, and Alaska Residents.
LDR:03249nmm a2200385 4500 001 2277763
005 20210528102122.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781088336328
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22583557
035 $a AAI22583557
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Markle, Amy. $3 3556096
245 1 0 $a In-groups, Out-groups and the Challenge of Increasing Diversity through Intentional Inclusion and Equity Practices: Exploring the Roles of Urban Land Managers, Affinity Groups, and Alaska Residents.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 424 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-04, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Coble, Theresa.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Missouri - Saint Louis, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Public lands belong to all of us. Yet, data indicate that some Americans are participating more than others in the decision-making processes that guide use, access, and availability of our public lands and resources. Three researchers investigated specific intersections of participation along the public decision-making process, with a focus on illuminating barriers to full public participation as well as potential bridges to increasing equitable inclusion. Researchers interviewed urban land managers and affinity group leaders, surveyed a sample of residents in Alaska, and examined public testimony from a city council discussion about an inclusion resolution in Homer, Alaska. Qualitative and quantitative analyses across these studies revealed that barriers prohibiting full participation can be grouped as either intra-barriers, which are seen within individuals, groups, or organizations, or as inter-barriers, which are seen between groups across society. Intra-barriers include difficulties such as lack of trust, deficient group representation, low familiarity with public lands, and shortage of resources. Inter-barriers involve lack of understanding of other cultures, groups, and agencies, and inconsistent priorities, policies, and mandates that drive efforts to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in public lands and access to decision making. Bridges, or solutions, to these barriers can be grouped into five major categories: building and maintaining strong partnerships, increasing participant representation, strengthening ally capabilities, improving staff representation and cultural competency, and improving engagement strategies. The researchers conclude that the most direct path to increasing access to public decision making is to increase equity and inclusion in tandem. Increasing both the intentionality of inclusion and the practices of equity ultimately lead to measurably higher rates of actively diverse participants.
590 $a School code: 0481.
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Urban planning. $3 2122922
650 4 $a Land use planning. $3 2122760
653 $a Diversity
653 $a Engagement
653 $a Equity
653 $a Inclusion
653 $a Public lands
653 $a Alaska
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0536
690 $a 0999
700 1 0 $a Newton, Susan $e joint author $3 3556097
700 1 0 $a Stuart, Laurie $e joint author $3 3547202
710 2 $a University of Missouri - Saint Louis. $b College of Education. $3 1674340
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-04A.
790 $a 0481
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22583557