東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Freedom of Education and the Era of ...

Craddock, Caroline.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Freedom of Education and the Era of the Rights of the Child: Can They Coexist?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Freedom of Education and the Era of the Rights of the Child: Can They Coexist?/
作者:	Craddock, Caroline.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	64 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-07.
標題:	Sociology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28275984
ISBN:	9798557019439

Freedom of Education and the Era of the Rights of the Child: Can They Coexist?
Craddock, Caroline.

Freedom of Education and the Era of the Rights of the Child: Can They Coexist? - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 64 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07.

Thesis (ALM)--Harvard University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

In this thesis, I perform a comparative case study on the status of freedom of education and related parental rights in the era of the rights of the child. The aim of this case study is to provide insight into whether freedom of education and the right of the child to an education can effectively coexist. This thesis begins by clarifying the history of these rights and their implications in international laws and treaties. The thesis then turns to answering the question: Can governments effectively mediate between freedom of education and the right of the child to an education when these rights come into conflict, or does the right of the child to a certain level of elementary education necessarily delegitimize or, to a lesser extent, limit the freedom of parents to choose how their children are educated?In order to answer this question, this thesis performs a comparative case study of the legal and political status of these rights in three nations: Germany, the United States, and Brazil. This case study evaluates and compares education policies in the three test nations. The data utilized in this thesis includes legal, historical, judicial, and policy documents from the test nations. In addition, this thesis utilizes scholarly research and philosophical writings on the topics of freedom of education, parental rights, and freedom of education.Freedom of education and the right of the child to an education are both important rights that are affirmed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and both rights ought to be protected in national and international laws. This case study finds that 4 freedom of education, parental rights, and the child's right to receive an education can effectively coexist. As is the case with many other rights (for example, privacy and security), these rights may sometimes come into conflict. Nevertheless, these conflicts do not invalidate the importance of either right or the duty of individual nations to protect both rights. Law and treaties that protect freedom of education do not preclude the possibility that governments should step in if parents wantonly neglect their duty to educate their child. Governments can and should put monitoring policies in place to ensure that the child's right to an education is protected. Likewise, laws protecting the right of the child to an education do not necessitate a government monopoly over education at the expense of parental rights and freedom of education.

ISBN: 9798557019439Subjects--Topical Terms:

516174
Sociology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Education

Freedom of Education and the Era of the Rights of the Child: Can They Coexist?
LDR:03679nmm a2200409 4500 001 2277579
005 20210521102028.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798557019439
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28275984
035 $a (MiAaPQ)vireoharvard1397Craddock
035 $a AAI28275984
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Craddock, Caroline. $3 3555899
245 1 0 $a Freedom of Education and the Era of the Rights of the Child: Can They Coexist?
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 64 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-07.
502 $a Thesis (ALM)--Harvard University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In this thesis, I perform a comparative case study on the status of freedom of education and related parental rights in the era of the rights of the child. The aim of this case study is to provide insight into whether freedom of education and the right of the child to an education can effectively coexist. This thesis begins by clarifying the history of these rights and their implications in international laws and treaties. The thesis then turns to answering the question: Can governments effectively mediate between freedom of education and the right of the child to an education when these rights come into conflict, or does the right of the child to a certain level of elementary education necessarily delegitimize or, to a lesser extent, limit the freedom of parents to choose how their children are educated?In order to answer this question, this thesis performs a comparative case study of the legal and political status of these rights in three nations: Germany, the United States, and Brazil. This case study evaluates and compares education policies in the three test nations. The data utilized in this thesis includes legal, historical, judicial, and policy documents from the test nations. In addition, this thesis utilizes scholarly research and philosophical writings on the topics of freedom of education, parental rights, and freedom of education.Freedom of education and the right of the child to an education are both important rights that are affirmed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and both rights ought to be protected in national and international laws. This case study finds that 4 freedom of education, parental rights, and the child's right to receive an education can effectively coexist. As is the case with many other rights (for example, privacy and security), these rights may sometimes come into conflict. Nevertheless, these conflicts do not invalidate the importance of either right or the duty of individual nations to protect both rights. Law and treaties that protect freedom of education do not preclude the possibility that governments should step in if parents wantonly neglect their duty to educate their child. Governments can and should put monitoring policies in place to ensure that the child's right to an education is protected. Likewise, laws protecting the right of the child to an education do not necessitate a government monopoly over education at the expense of parental rights and freedom of education.
590 $a School code: 0084.
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 2191387
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
653 $a Education
653 $a Homeschool
653 $a Freedom of education
653 $a Private school
653 $a Germany
653 $a Brazil
653 $a United States
653 $a Right to education
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0626
710 2 $a Harvard University. $b Government. $3 2098260
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-07.
790 $a 0084
791 $a ALM
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28275984