東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Political Change, Parties and Voters.

University of California, Berkeley., Economics.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Political Change, Parties and Voters.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Political Change, Parties and Voters./
作者:	Jensen, Katarina Helena.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	94 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-05A.
標題:	Political science. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28089485
ISBN:	9798691235788

Political Change, Parties and Voters.
Jensen, Katarina Helena.

Political Change, Parties and Voters. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 94 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

When trying to understand political change in democracies it is natural to think of voters as the driving force. But much political change-including the elections of Donald Trump and Boris Johnson-is as much a product of dynamics happening within existing parties-enabling such candidates to come close to power-as it is a product of voters voting for those parties. A complete understanding of political change thus requires understanding the behavior and role not only of voters, but also of parties.This thesis studies political change and the roles of voters and parties in driving such change. In the first chapter I study the political consequences across and within parties of refugee migration. I combine Danish administrative data on local politicians from 1993-2013 with quasi-random refugee placements to show that refugee migration does not increase voters' support for the far right. Instead, it increases the propensity for candidates from lower social backgrounds to be elected. This effect is driven both by parties and voters: First, parties place candidates from lower social backgrounds higher on lists and switch to a party system, where individual candidate popularity, rather than party list position, determines election. Second, voters cast individual votes for these candidates from lower social backgrounds. In a nationally representative survey experiment I show that voters' preference for candidates from lower social backgrounds can in part be explained by refugee migration increasing their preferences for redistribution towards natives, preferences that are mirrored by candidates from lower social backgrounds.In the second chapter of my thesis, I further explore the role of parties in responding to and driving political change. Specifically, I derive a theoretical framework to study how changes in the ideological bias favoring a party affect the propensity to run an open list, and how this in turn affects their support from voters. I find that parties run closed lists if the ideological bias is small. However, when voters become sufficiently biased towards one party, that party opens up its list. This switch to open lists in turn increases their support from voters beyond the effect of the ideological bias. The reason for this is that candidates in popular parties exert more effort in open than closed lists. These results imply that large parties are more powerful in proportional representation systems where parties can choose their list structure compared to closed list systems.Overall, this dissertation shows that when trying to understand political change, it is important to consider the role not only of voters, but also of parties in driving such change.

ISBN: 9798691235788Subjects--Topical Terms:

528916
Political science.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Political change

Political Change, Parties and Voters.
LDR:04024nmm a2200457 4500 001 2277524
005 20210521102015.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798691235788
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28089485
035 $a AAI28089485
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Jensen, Katarina Helena. $3 3555841
245 1 0 $a Political Change, Parties and Voters.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 94 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Finan, Frederico.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a When trying to understand political change in democracies it is natural to think of voters as the driving force. But much political change-including the elections of Donald Trump and Boris Johnson-is as much a product of dynamics happening within existing parties-enabling such candidates to come close to power-as it is a product of voters voting for those parties. A complete understanding of political change thus requires understanding the behavior and role not only of voters, but also of parties.This thesis studies political change and the roles of voters and parties in driving such change. In the first chapter I study the political consequences across and within parties of refugee migration. I combine Danish administrative data on local politicians from 1993-2013 with quasi-random refugee placements to show that refugee migration does not increase voters' support for the far right. Instead, it increases the propensity for candidates from lower social backgrounds to be elected. This effect is driven both by parties and voters: First, parties place candidates from lower social backgrounds higher on lists and switch to a party system, where individual candidate popularity, rather than party list position, determines election. Second, voters cast individual votes for these candidates from lower social backgrounds. In a nationally representative survey experiment I show that voters' preference for candidates from lower social backgrounds can in part be explained by refugee migration increasing their preferences for redistribution towards natives, preferences that are mirrored by candidates from lower social backgrounds.In the second chapter of my thesis, I further explore the role of parties in responding to and driving political change. Specifically, I derive a theoretical framework to study how changes in the ideological bias favoring a party affect the propensity to run an open list, and how this in turn affects their support from voters. I find that parties run closed lists if the ideological bias is small. However, when voters become sufficiently biased towards one party, that party opens up its list. This switch to open lists in turn increases their support from voters beyond the effect of the ideological bias. The reason for this is that candidates in popular parties exert more effort in open than closed lists. These results imply that large parties are more powerful in proportional representation systems where parties can choose their list structure compared to closed list systems.Overall, this dissertation shows that when trying to understand political change, it is important to consider the role not only of voters, but also of parties in driving such change.
590 $a School code: 0028.
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
650 4 $a Social studies education. $3 3422293
650 4 $a Social research. $3 2122687
653 $a Political change
653 $a Voters
653 $a Democracy
653 $a Voter incentive
653 $a Donald Trump
653 $a Boris Johnson
653 $a Existing political parties
653 $a Refugee migration
653 $a Election
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0344
690 $a 0534
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b Economics. $3 1673006
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-05A.
790 $a 0028
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28089485