東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Wildlife Governance in an Era of Soc...

Sullivan, Leeann Marie.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Wildlife Governance in an Era of Social Change: How Science, Politics, and Culture Influence Conservation Governance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Wildlife Governance in an Era of Social Change: How Science, Politics, and Culture Influence Conservation Governance./
作者:	Sullivan, Leeann Marie.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	86 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-03B.
標題:	Natural resource management. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28024943
ISBN:	9798664770179

Wildlife Governance in an Era of Social Change: How Science, Politics, and Culture Influence Conservation Governance.
Sullivan, Leeann Marie.

Wildlife Governance in an Era of Social Change: How Science, Politics, and Culture Influence Conservation Governance. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 86 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Wildlife conservation faces unprecedented ecological challenges in the years ahead. But it is the human dimensions of conservation, from competing values to inequities in access to power, that pose the most significant threat to these efforts in the near term. As values toward wildlife shift in response to modernization and more people become engaged in political activism around conservation issues, wildlife organizations in the public and non-profit sector face calls for governance reform to bring a broader diversity of the public into conservation efforts. Such inclusive and pluralistic models of conservation governance, however, mark a significant divergence from technocratic approaches of the past that prioritize input from technically trained experts over members of the public and root almost exclusively in domination ideologies. The resulting conflict between wildlife conservation centered on science and expertise and the democratic belief that all people should have a say in the management and protection of their natural resources marks a significant contradiction at the heart of wildlife conservation. Assessing the potential for achieving more participatory conservation within this frame requires a deeper understanding of the cultural, social, and political drivers of technocratic governance and how both internal and external factors serve to reinforce these political practices. In this dissertation, I draw out the historical, institutional, and cultural foundations of technocracy in wildlife conservation and their implications for achieving a participatory turn. In Chapter 2, I outline how historic paradigms for scientific expertise and domination values in U.S. wildlife management shapes the frame through which practitioners perceive their organizations as adaptable and accountable and ultimately influence perceptions of the need for change. In Chapters 3 and 4, I explore how existing governance modes are culturally reinforced, first through an internal "technocratic mentality" which proposes that scientifically-trained experts are solely and uniquely qualified to make decisions about wildlife and second, through external cultural pressures that influence governance processes in response to broader societal pressures for hierarchy and social order. Taken together, these chapters illustrate the complex and socially embedded nature of power in wildlife conservation and offer new insight into the potential for achieving governance reform in an era of social change.

ISBN: 9798664770179Subjects--Topical Terms:

589570
Natural resource management.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Governance

Wildlife Governance in an Era of Social Change: How Science, Politics, and Culture Influence Conservation Governance.
LDR:03711nmm a2200373 4500 001 2277501
005 20210521102010.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798664770179
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28024943
035 $a AAI28024943
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Sullivan, Leeann Marie. $3 3555817
245 1 0 $a Wildlife Governance in an Era of Social Change: How Science, Politics, and Culture Influence Conservation Governance.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 86 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Manfredo, Michael;Teel, Tara.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Colorado State University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Wildlife conservation faces unprecedented ecological challenges in the years ahead. But it is the human dimensions of conservation, from competing values to inequities in access to power, that pose the most significant threat to these efforts in the near term. As values toward wildlife shift in response to modernization and more people become engaged in political activism around conservation issues, wildlife organizations in the public and non-profit sector face calls for governance reform to bring a broader diversity of the public into conservation efforts. Such inclusive and pluralistic models of conservation governance, however, mark a significant divergence from technocratic approaches of the past that prioritize input from technically trained experts over members of the public and root almost exclusively in domination ideologies. The resulting conflict between wildlife conservation centered on science and expertise and the democratic belief that all people should have a say in the management and protection of their natural resources marks a significant contradiction at the heart of wildlife conservation. Assessing the potential for achieving more participatory conservation within this frame requires a deeper understanding of the cultural, social, and political drivers of technocratic governance and how both internal and external factors serve to reinforce these political practices. In this dissertation, I draw out the historical, institutional, and cultural foundations of technocracy in wildlife conservation and their implications for achieving a participatory turn. In Chapter 2, I outline how historic paradigms for scientific expertise and domination values in U.S. wildlife management shapes the frame through which practitioners perceive their organizations as adaptable and accountable and ultimately influence perceptions of the need for change. In Chapters 3 and 4, I explore how existing governance modes are culturally reinforced, first through an internal "technocratic mentality" which proposes that scientifically-trained experts are solely and uniquely qualified to make decisions about wildlife and second, through external cultural pressures that influence governance processes in response to broader societal pressures for hierarchy and social order. Taken together, these chapters illustrate the complex and socially embedded nature of power in wildlife conservation and offer new insight into the potential for achieving governance reform in an era of social change.
590 $a School code: 0053.
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Environmental studies. $3 2122803
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
653 $a Governance
653 $a Modernization
653 $a Participation
653 $a Technocracy
653 $a Wildlife
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0477
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a Colorado State University. $b Human Dimensions of Natural Resources. $3 1675821
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-03B.
790 $a 0053
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28024943