東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Examination of Message Strategie...

Beall, Lindsey.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Examination of Message Strategies Used by Environmental Organizations to Communicate with Members.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Examination of Message Strategies Used by Environmental Organizations to Communicate with Members./
作者:	Beall, Lindsey.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	211 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13878640
ISBN:	9781392230398

The Examination of Message Strategies Used by Environmental Organizations to Communicate with Members.
Beall, Lindsey.

The Examination of Message Strategies Used by Environmental Organizations to Communicate with Members. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 211 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2019.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

Environmental advocacy organizations have become increasingly important players in social movements and catalysts behind policy change. These organizations often use computer-mediated communication, such as mass emails and social media, to facilitate civic engagement (Obar, Zube, & Lampe, 2012). In this dissertation, I conducted two studies to determine what message strategies-specifically message frames and emotional appeals-environmental organizations use in their communication with members, and how effective those frames and emotional appeals are at eliciting the desired behavioral response (e.g., signing a petition, making a public comment, RSVPing to a rally or event). Evidence suggests that message frames-gain vs. loss frames, and emphasis frames that highlight a specific dimension of an issue (e.g., climate change is a public health frame, moral frame, national security frame, etc.)-can influence message recipients in important ways (e.g., support for environmental policies and performance of activism behaviors). Evidence also suggests that the emotional appeals used in messages (e.g., fear, hope) can influence message recipients in important ways, positively or negatively depending on the circumstances (O'Keefe, 2016). In study 1, I content analyzed 213 action alerts sent between May 2016 and May 2017 from three environmental advocacy organizations in the Northern Virginia area. For each action alert I coded both the message frames (based on frames previously identified in the environmental communication literature) and the emotional appeals present. Results from study 1 indicate that environmental frames, economic frames, public health frames, and moral frames emerged most frequently in the emails. For emotional appeals, elements of the EPPM-threat severity messages, positive internal efficacy, participative efficacy, and collective external political efficacy- and hope appeals emerged most frequently. In study 2, I examined the effectiveness of those communication strategies at eliciting the behavioral response requested in the email (i.e., link clicks). Contrary to expectations, neither the message frames nor the emotional appeals significantly influenced the behavioral response. Results from these studies shed light on how theory-based communication strategies emerge in an applied, ecologically-valid setting and how messages differ from those in experimental designs. This research suggests that persuasive messages in the environmental realm tend to have multiple frames in one message, indicating that further examination about the weight of certain frames, outside of the traditional frame/counter-frame scope, is warranted. Finally, practical implications were less concrete; however, results indicated that advocacy groups use well-documented climate change frames and elements of the EPPM in their messaging, suggesting a bridge between theory and practice. In addition to other implications, limitations and future research opportunities are discussed.

ISBN: 9781392230398Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Activism

The Examination of Message Strategies Used by Environmental Organizations to Communicate with Members.
LDR:04336nmm a2200397 4500 001 2277130
005 20210517123413.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392230398
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13878640
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gmu:12020
035 $a AAI13878640
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Beall, Lindsey. $3 3555436
245 1 4 $a The Examination of Message Strategies Used by Environmental Organizations to Communicate with Members.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 211 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Maibach, Edward W.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Environmental advocacy organizations have become increasingly important players in social movements and catalysts behind policy change. These organizations often use computer-mediated communication, such as mass emails and social media, to facilitate civic engagement (Obar, Zube, & Lampe, 2012). In this dissertation, I conducted two studies to determine what message strategies-specifically message frames and emotional appeals-environmental organizations use in their communication with members, and how effective those frames and emotional appeals are at eliciting the desired behavioral response (e.g., signing a petition, making a public comment, RSVPing to a rally or event). Evidence suggests that message frames-gain vs. loss frames, and emphasis frames that highlight a specific dimension of an issue (e.g., climate change is a public health frame, moral frame, national security frame, etc.)-can influence message recipients in important ways (e.g., support for environmental policies and performance of activism behaviors). Evidence also suggests that the emotional appeals used in messages (e.g., fear, hope) can influence message recipients in important ways, positively or negatively depending on the circumstances (O'Keefe, 2016). In study 1, I content analyzed 213 action alerts sent between May 2016 and May 2017 from three environmental advocacy organizations in the Northern Virginia area. For each action alert I coded both the message frames (based on frames previously identified in the environmental communication literature) and the emotional appeals present. Results from study 1 indicate that environmental frames, economic frames, public health frames, and moral frames emerged most frequently in the emails. For emotional appeals, elements of the EPPM-threat severity messages, positive internal efficacy, participative efficacy, and collective external political efficacy- and hope appeals emerged most frequently. In study 2, I examined the effectiveness of those communication strategies at eliciting the behavioral response requested in the email (i.e., link clicks). Contrary to expectations, neither the message frames nor the emotional appeals significantly influenced the behavioral response. Results from these studies shed light on how theory-based communication strategies emerge in an applied, ecologically-valid setting and how messages differ from those in experimental designs. This research suggests that persuasive messages in the environmental realm tend to have multiple frames in one message, indicating that further examination about the weight of certain frames, outside of the traditional frame/counter-frame scope, is warranted. Finally, practical implications were less concrete; however, results indicated that advocacy groups use well-documented climate change frames and elements of the EPPM in their messaging, suggesting a bridge between theory and practice. In addition to other implications, limitations and future research opportunities are discussed.
590 $a School code: 0883.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Environmental Studies. $3 1669635
653 $a Activism
653 $a Emotional appeals
653 $a Environmental advocacy
653 $a Framing
653 $a Persuasion
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0477
710 2 $a George Mason University. $b Communication. $3 2093634
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0883
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13878640