東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Do Personalized Learning Program...

Bright, Sarah.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Do Personalized Learning Programs' Instructional Designs Match Gifted Students' Experiences in Using Them?

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Do Personalized Learning Programs' Instructional Designs Match Gifted Students' Experiences in Using Them?/
作者:	Bright, Sarah.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	186 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12.
標題:	Curriculum development. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27995373
ISBN:	9798645463267

How Do Personalized Learning Programs' Instructional Designs Match Gifted Students' Experiences in Using Them?
Bright, Sarah.

How Do Personalized Learning Programs' Instructional Designs Match Gifted Students' Experiences in Using Them? - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 186 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--DePaul University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Personalized learning technology is a quickly spreading and well-funded educational trend that is the focus of much discussion and controversy. The impact of personalized learning tools for reading in the general education population have been widely researched and hotly debated, but there is little research around the success and impact of its use with gifted students. Using a grounded theory methodology, my qualitative research study worked within the theoretical frameworks of critical technology and New Literacy to compare the assumptions and understandings about the reading process applied by the developers of Reading Plus, a personalized learning program for reading, with the experiences of gifted fourth-grade students using it. My research showed that Reading Plus matches the extant researched criteria for quality personalized learning tools for reading development. Overall, the product's features fit with the experiences and learning needs of the students in the study; however, there was some misalignment in the areas of students' motivation, challenge, and academic confidence. Although the student participants comprised a generally homogenous group, their experiences, preferences, and understandings of technology were quite varied. My key recommendations are that educators and curriculum as well as instructional technology developers should focus on the differences in the experiences, preferences, and abilities of students when building, selecting, and using educational technology tools. The need to more individually and holistically match a personalized learning tool with students is necessary and possible, given the increased adaptability of emerging software and hardware in the educational technology marketplace. In addition, researchers need to look more deeply into the impacts of technology on more diverse learner populations, including gifted students.

ISBN: 9798645463267Subjects--Topical Terms:

684418
Curriculum development.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Critical technology theory

How Do Personalized Learning Programs' Instructional Designs Match Gifted Students' Experiences in Using Them?
LDR:03086nmm a2200373 4500 001 2276537
005 20210510090153.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798645463267
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27995373
035 $a AAI27995373
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bright, Sarah. $3 3554823
245 1 0 $a How Do Personalized Learning Programs' Instructional Designs Match Gifted Students' Experiences in Using Them?
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 186 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12.
500 $a Advisor: Donovan, Marie A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--DePaul University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Personalized learning technology is a quickly spreading and well-funded educational trend that is the focus of much discussion and controversy. The impact of personalized learning tools for reading in the general education population have been widely researched and hotly debated, but there is little research around the success and impact of its use with gifted students. Using a grounded theory methodology, my qualitative research study worked within the theoretical frameworks of critical technology and New Literacy to compare the assumptions and understandings about the reading process applied by the developers of Reading Plus, a personalized learning program for reading, with the experiences of gifted fourth-grade students using it. My research showed that Reading Plus matches the extant researched criteria for quality personalized learning tools for reading development. Overall, the product's features fit with the experiences and learning needs of the students in the study; however, there was some misalignment in the areas of students' motivation, challenge, and academic confidence. Although the student participants comprised a generally homogenous group, their experiences, preferences, and understandings of technology were quite varied. My key recommendations are that educators and curriculum as well as instructional technology developers should focus on the differences in the experiences, preferences, and abilities of students when building, selecting, and using educational technology tools. The need to more individually and holistically match a personalized learning tool with students is necessary and possible, given the increased adaptability of emerging software and hardware in the educational technology marketplace. In addition, researchers need to look more deeply into the impacts of technology on more diverse learner populations, including gifted students.
590 $a School code: 0937.
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 684418
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 517670
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
650 4 $a Gifted education. $3 3172499
653 $a Critical technology theory
653 $a Instructional technology
653 $a New literacy
653 $a Personalized learning
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0445
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a DePaul University. $b College of Education. $3 3173376
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12.
790 $a 0937
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27995373