東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Effects of Disability Labeling o...

Mohammed, Amra Abdulrahman.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Effects of Disability Labeling on Teachers' Referrals of Twice-exceptional Children to Gifted Programs in Saudi Arabia.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Effects of Disability Labeling on Teachers' Referrals of Twice-exceptional Children to Gifted Programs in Saudi Arabia./
作者:	Mohammed, Amra Abdulrahman.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	228 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International82-01A.
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27959620
ISBN:	9798662382091

The Effects of Disability Labeling on Teachers' Referrals of Twice-exceptional Children to Gifted Programs in Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed, Amra Abdulrahman.

The Effects of Disability Labeling on Teachers' Referrals of Twice-exceptional Children to Gifted Programs in Saudi Arabia. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 228 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northern Colorado, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The issue of biases associated with labeling students as gifted or as having a disability presents a significant challenge to educational professionals with regard to identification and the provision of services. In the presence of labels indicating giftedness, disability, and twice exceptionality, research consistently demonstrated biases on the part of parents, teachers, and even other students. These biases could prevent students from receiving the services they need to achieve their fullest potential (Bianco & Leech, 2010). The current study systematically replicated a study by Bianco and Leech (2010) and examined the influence of disability labels on teachers' decisions to refer students to gifted programming. Further, this study investigated whether there were any differences in teachers' responses based on the type of teaching certificate they held (i.e., gifted education, special education, general education). Three groups of in-service teachers (85 general, 59 special, and 43 gifted education teachers) from the Western region of Saudi Arabia participated in the study. A cross-sectional survey methodology was employed. Teachers were randomly assigned to one of three survey conditions that consisted of a vignette that described a student with both giftedness and high potential traits, differing only with respect to one of three labeling conditions (no label, learning disability [LD], autism spectrum disorder [ASD]).Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the influence of teacher type and the labeling condition on the teachers' ratings. Responses to an open-ended question that asked teachers to provide a reason for their referral decisions were analyzed qualitatively. The quantitative analysis showed neither teacher type nor the presence or absence of a disability label had a significant influence on the overall ratings, which was in sharp contrast to Bianco and Leech's (2010) results. The interaction of the two variables was also nonsignificant. Most of the participants (94%) chose to agree or strongly agree with a referral. However, of the few nonreferrals, most were for students with ASD. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis of the teachers' rationales including (a) the student shows gifted traits, (b) the student's skills could be cultivated with support, and (c) the student does not fit the definition for giftedness.Findings from this study provided insights into the issues of labeling students and the status of twice-exceptionality in Saudi Arabia. The results indicated limited, negative bias among different types of teachers with respect to students with disabilities. Also, the participants in this study showed a strong orientation toward supporting the growth and development of the student in all three vignette conditions. However, it remained clear that Saudi Arabia would still greatly benefit from establishing a clear policy on twiceexceptionality and providing training programs to educators with respect to defining, identifying, and educating students with giftedness and disabilities.

ISBN: 9798662382091Subjects--Topical Terms:

516693
Special education.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Disability labeling

The Effects of Disability Labeling on Teachers' Referrals of Twice-exceptional Children to Gifted Programs in Saudi Arabia.
LDR:04340nmm a2200373 4500 001 2276514
005 20210510090148.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798662382091
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27959620
035 $a AAI27959620
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Mohammed, Amra Abdulrahman. $3 3554796
245 1 4 $a The Effects of Disability Labeling on Teachers' Referrals of Twice-exceptional Children to Gifted Programs in Saudi Arabia.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 228 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Ritchotte, Jennifer.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Northern Colorado, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The issue of biases associated with labeling students as gifted or as having a disability presents a significant challenge to educational professionals with regard to identification and the provision of services. In the presence of labels indicating giftedness, disability, and twice exceptionality, research consistently demonstrated biases on the part of parents, teachers, and even other students. These biases could prevent students from receiving the services they need to achieve their fullest potential (Bianco & Leech, 2010). The current study systematically replicated a study by Bianco and Leech (2010) and examined the influence of disability labels on teachers' decisions to refer students to gifted programming. Further, this study investigated whether there were any differences in teachers' responses based on the type of teaching certificate they held (i.e., gifted education, special education, general education). Three groups of in-service teachers (85 general, 59 special, and 43 gifted education teachers) from the Western region of Saudi Arabia participated in the study. A cross-sectional survey methodology was employed. Teachers were randomly assigned to one of three survey conditions that consisted of a vignette that described a student with both giftedness and high potential traits, differing only with respect to one of three labeling conditions (no label, learning disability [LD], autism spectrum disorder [ASD]).Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the influence of teacher type and the labeling condition on the teachers' ratings. Responses to an open-ended question that asked teachers to provide a reason for their referral decisions were analyzed qualitatively. The quantitative analysis showed neither teacher type nor the presence or absence of a disability label had a significant influence on the overall ratings, which was in sharp contrast to Bianco and Leech's (2010) results. The interaction of the two variables was also nonsignificant. Most of the participants (94%) chose to agree or strongly agree with a referral. However, of the few nonreferrals, most were for students with ASD. Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis of the teachers' rationales including (a) the student shows gifted traits, (b) the student's skills could be cultivated with support, and (c) the student does not fit the definition for giftedness.Findings from this study provided insights into the issues of labeling students and the status of twice-exceptionality in Saudi Arabia. The results indicated limited, negative bias among different types of teachers with respect to students with disabilities. Also, the participants in this study showed a strong orientation toward supporting the growth and development of the student in all three vignette conditions. However, it remained clear that Saudi Arabia would still greatly benefit from establishing a clear policy on twiceexceptionality and providing training programs to educators with respect to defining, identifying, and educating students with giftedness and disabilities.
590 $a School code: 0161.
650 4 $a Special education. $3 516693
650 4 $a Gifted education. $3 3172499
653 $a Disability labeling
653 $a Gifted programming
653 $a Gifted students
653 $a Referral decision
653 $a Students with disability
653 $a Twice-exceptional students
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0445
710 2 $a University of Northern Colorado. $b Special Education. $3 3189362
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 82-01A.
790 $a 0161
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27959620