東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Comparing the Effects of Positive Ps...

Ekstrom , Charlotte .

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Comparing the Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions: Using Gratitude Journaling and Personality Strengths Interventions.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Comparing the Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions: Using Gratitude Journaling and Personality Strengths Interventions./
作者:	Ekstrom , Charlotte .
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	84 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-02.
標題:	Psychology. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28028544
ISBN:	9798662488014

Comparing the Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions: Using Gratitude Journaling and Personality Strengths Interventions.
Ekstrom , Charlotte .

Comparing the Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions: Using Gratitude Journaling and Personality Strengths Interventions. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 84 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02.

Thesis (M.A.)--Webster University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The aim of this study was to compare and ascertain the effectiveness of two positive psychology interventions, personality strengths interventions on the one hand and gratitude interventions on the other. The goal was to find out which one is more effective in increasing feelings of happiness and reducing feelings of stress, anxiety and low moods. The outcome of the study is that while personality strengths interventions decrease feelings of stress, anxiety and low moods more than gratitude interventions, neither of the interventions showed any effect on subjective well-being. The participants were divided into three groups, group one was instructed to do gratitude activities, group two was instructed to do positive psychology interventions based on their top three personality strengths and group three acted as a control group and did not receive any intervention. The study took place during rather extreme circumstances when most of Europe was experiencing a lockdown due to the coronavirus pandemic which was a major confounding variable. It was carried out over the course of 14 days with participants instructed to spend 20 minutes a day on the exercises in the experimental groups. 57 people started the study and 45 completed it. A between-group experimental design using factorial ANOVAS to analyse the results was used. To measure the participants' stress levels the Perceived Stress (PSS) as well as the stress scale from the Depression, Anxiety and Stress inventory (DASS-42) were used. Participants' low moods were measured using the depression and anxiety scales in the DASS-42. To measure participants levels of well-being the Authentic Happiness Inventory (AHI) was used and to identify participants' character strengths the VIA Character Strengths Survey was used. The standardised tests measuring participants' stress, anxiety, low moods and subjective happiness were measured prior to starting the experiment and measured again on the last and 14th day of study.

ISBN: 9798662488014Subjects--Topical Terms:

519075
Psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Positive psychology interventions

Comparing the Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions: Using Gratitude Journaling and Personality Strengths Interventions.
LDR:03169nmm a2200349 4500 001 2276351
005 20210503061414.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798662488014
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28028544
035 $a AAI28028544
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ekstrom , Charlotte . $3 3554632
245 1 0 $a Comparing the Effects of Positive Psychology Interventions: Using Gratitude Journaling and Personality Strengths Interventions.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 84 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-02.
500 $a Advisor: Katrin Kristjansdottir;Walla, Peter.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Webster University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The aim of this study was to compare and ascertain the effectiveness of two positive psychology interventions, personality strengths interventions on the one hand and gratitude interventions on the other. The goal was to find out which one is more effective in increasing feelings of happiness and reducing feelings of stress, anxiety and low moods. The outcome of the study is that while personality strengths interventions decrease feelings of stress, anxiety and low moods more than gratitude interventions, neither of the interventions showed any effect on subjective well-being. The participants were divided into three groups, group one was instructed to do gratitude activities, group two was instructed to do positive psychology interventions based on their top three personality strengths and group three acted as a control group and did not receive any intervention. The study took place during rather extreme circumstances when most of Europe was experiencing a lockdown due to the coronavirus pandemic which was a major confounding variable. It was carried out over the course of 14 days with participants instructed to spend 20 minutes a day on the exercises in the experimental groups. 57 people started the study and 45 completed it. A between-group experimental design using factorial ANOVAS to analyse the results was used. To measure the participants' stress levels the Perceived Stress (PSS) as well as the stress scale from the Depression, Anxiety and Stress inventory (DASS-42) were used. Participants' low moods were measured using the depression and anxiety scales in the DASS-42. To measure participants levels of well-being the Authentic Happiness Inventory (AHI) was used and to identify participants' character strengths the VIA Character Strengths Survey was used. The standardised tests measuring participants' stress, anxiety, low moods and subjective happiness were measured prior to starting the experiment and measured again on the last and 14th day of study.
590 $a School code: 0813.
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 2144789
650 4 $a Clinical psychology. $3 524863
653 $a Positive psychology interventions
653 $a Gratitude journaling
653 $a Personality strengths interventions
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0622
710 2 $a Webster University. $b Psychology. $3 3341132
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-02.
790 $a 0813
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28028544