東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Flow of Resilience: A Case Study...

Emmons, Derek D.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Flow of Resilience: A Case Study on Working Land Conservation in the Tule River Watershed, California.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Flow of Resilience: A Case Study on Working Land Conservation in the Tule River Watershed, California./
作者:	Emmons, Derek D.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	106 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-06.
標題:	Geography. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28028523
ISBN:	9798698595052

The Flow of Resilience: A Case Study on Working Land Conservation in the Tule River Watershed, California.
Emmons, Derek D.

The Flow of Resilience: A Case Study on Working Land Conservation in the Tule River Watershed, California. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 106 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.

Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The long-term ecological health of California's rural watersheds relies upon the engagement and collaboration of diverse stakeholders. To support Social-Ecological Systems (SES) resilience on a landscape scale, it is necessary to strengthen opportunities for private land managers to share their vision, conflicts, and communicative processes around ecological restoration practice. The intention of this research is to contribute to a dialogue on process-oriented solutions, identify common goals, and build a better understanding of how social and political-economic relationships influence regenerative land management on the ground level.This case study examines the social drivers of ecological restoration practices on working landscapes in the Tule River watershed of Tulare County, California. Research questions include: 1) Who is involved with riparian restoration practices and what are their underlying principles of land stewardship? 2) What types of ecological restorations or regenerative land management techniques are being implemented in the Upper Tule watershed? 3) What are opportunities and barriers to implementing watershed scale restorative practices? 4) What are the long-term land management goals and visions relating to working lands conservation in the Tule River watershed?The research methodology consisted of ethnographic interviews and surveys with ranchers, land managers, tribal council members, community educators, and government agents. Participants are identified through snowball sampling, public records, and public agency recommendations. By highlighting the unique context and commonalities surrounding their land management goals, the intended outcome of this study is to better support communicative flow, reconciliation, and SES connectivity on a watershed scale.Restoration practitioners expressed general principles relating to land stewardship, which were grouped into five main themes. This included interconnectivity, sustainability, balance, respect, and regeneration. The restoration practices included components of passive livestock exclusion and soil conservation, active riparian plantings, and re-wilding of disturbance regimes. Land management visions included the protection of open space, sustainable livelihoods, and political-economic reforms that encourage collaboration around biodiversity protection, diversified incomes, and support for ecosystem services. The stakeholder visions weaved together fragmented components of community and ecology, from a perspective that planning on intergenerational timescales and use of different approaches are necessary to shift from extinction trends towards collective SES resilience.

ISBN: 9798698595052Subjects--Topical Terms:

524010
Geography.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Conflict mediation

The Flow of Resilience: A Case Study on Working Land Conservation in the Tule River Watershed, California.
LDR:04100nmm a2200469 4500 001 2276350
005 20210503061414.5
008 220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798698595052
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28028523
035 $a AAI28028523
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Emmons, Derek D. $3 3554631
245 1 4 $a The Flow of Resilience: A Case Study on Working Land Conservation in the Tule River Watershed, California.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 106 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-06.
500 $a Advisor: House-Peters, Lily.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--California State University, Long Beach, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The long-term ecological health of California's rural watersheds relies upon the engagement and collaboration of diverse stakeholders. To support Social-Ecological Systems (SES) resilience on a landscape scale, it is necessary to strengthen opportunities for private land managers to share their vision, conflicts, and communicative processes around ecological restoration practice. The intention of this research is to contribute to a dialogue on process-oriented solutions, identify common goals, and build a better understanding of how social and political-economic relationships influence regenerative land management on the ground level.This case study examines the social drivers of ecological restoration practices on working landscapes in the Tule River watershed of Tulare County, California. Research questions include: 1) Who is involved with riparian restoration practices and what are their underlying principles of land stewardship? 2) What types of ecological restorations or regenerative land management techniques are being implemented in the Upper Tule watershed? 3) What are opportunities and barriers to implementing watershed scale restorative practices? 4) What are the long-term land management goals and visions relating to working lands conservation in the Tule River watershed?The research methodology consisted of ethnographic interviews and surveys with ranchers, land managers, tribal council members, community educators, and government agents. Participants are identified through snowball sampling, public records, and public agency recommendations. By highlighting the unique context and commonalities surrounding their land management goals, the intended outcome of this study is to better support communicative flow, reconciliation, and SES connectivity on a watershed scale.Restoration practitioners expressed general principles relating to land stewardship, which were grouped into five main themes. This included interconnectivity, sustainability, balance, respect, and regeneration. The restoration practices included components of passive livestock exclusion and soil conservation, active riparian plantings, and re-wilding of disturbance regimes. Land management visions included the protection of open space, sustainable livelihoods, and political-economic reforms that encourage collaboration around biodiversity protection, diversified incomes, and support for ecosystem services. The stakeholder visions weaved together fragmented components of community and ecology, from a perspective that planning on intergenerational timescales and use of different approaches are necessary to shift from extinction trends towards collective SES resilience.
590 $a School code: 6080.
650 4 $a Geography. $3 524010
650 4 $a Range management. $3 647222
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Ecology. $3 516476
650 4 $a Landscape architecture. $3 541842
650 4 $a Land use planning. $3 2122760
650 4 $a Conservation biology. $3 535736
653 $a Conflict mediation
653 $a Ecological restoration
653 $a Refugia
653 $a Social-ecological systems Resilience
653 $a Tule River Watershed
653 $a Working landscapes
653 $a California
653 $a Land conservation
690 $a 0366
690 $a 0777
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0390
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0536
690 $a 0408
690 $a 0329
710 2 $a California State University, Long Beach. $b Geography. $3 3188477
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-06.
790 $a 6080
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28028523