語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
A Dual Process Model of Empathy.
~
Martingano, Alison Jane.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
A Dual Process Model of Empathy.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
A Dual Process Model of Empathy./
作者:
Martingano, Alison Jane.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:
183 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International82-04B.
標題:
Social psychology. -
電子資源:
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28087130
ISBN:
9798678178381
A Dual Process Model of Empathy.
Martingano, Alison Jane.
A Dual Process Model of Empathy.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 183 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The New School, 2020.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
The division of empathy into at least two types has been theorized since the 18th Century when Adam Smith differentiated between one's emotional reactions to others' and the ability to recognize these emotional states free of emotional experience. Smith's distinction persists today under the nomenclature of emotional empathy and cognitive empathy. The dual process model of empathy proposed in this thesis offers a new defining feature of each type, namely, that the process of arousing cognitive empathy is deliberate while the process of arousing emotional empathy is intuitive. This dissertation provides support for this dual process model of empathy by measuring empathic gains following tasks that promote intuitive or deliberate processing. It presents meta-analytic (chapter 2) and experimental (chapter 4) evidence that people intuitively respond with emotional empathy following virtual reality (VR) experiences. Such experiences depicting situations including being in a refugee camp, homeless shelter, or hospital ward lead users to feel empathy for the people depicted but does not improve their cognitive empathy.Complementary experimental evidence from a referential communication paradigm (chapter 3) demonstrates that cognitive empathy can be improved when deliberately engaged. Participants were assigned to communicate openly with their partner or listen-in to someone else's conversation (an overhearer). When participants were prevented from actively communicating, they had to engage in deliberate perspective-taking to understand what the other people meant. Following this task, over-hearers demonstrated higher performance on measures of cognitive empathy compared to interlocutors. Together these three studies demonstrate that emotional empathy is intuitively aroused whereas cognitive empathy requires engagement of deliberate effort. The proposed dual process model provides a testable explanation for why different types of empathy occur in response to different tasks. It works within the existing binary framework of cognitive and emotional empathy. It complements, rather than contradicts, the pre-existing definitions of empathy by defining the process by which each type of empathy is aroused.
ISBN: 9798678178381Subjects--Topical Terms:
520219
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Affective Empathy
A Dual Process Model of Empathy.
LDR
:03378nmm a2200385 4500
001
2276030
005
20210416102017.5
008
220723s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9798678178381
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI28087130
035
$a
AAI28087130
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Martingano, Alison Jane.
$3
3554284
245
1 0
$a
A Dual Process Model of Empathy.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2020
300
$a
183 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04, Section: B.
500
$a
Advisor: Konrath, Sara;Hirst, William.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The New School, 2020.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
The division of empathy into at least two types has been theorized since the 18th Century when Adam Smith differentiated between one's emotional reactions to others' and the ability to recognize these emotional states free of emotional experience. Smith's distinction persists today under the nomenclature of emotional empathy and cognitive empathy. The dual process model of empathy proposed in this thesis offers a new defining feature of each type, namely, that the process of arousing cognitive empathy is deliberate while the process of arousing emotional empathy is intuitive. This dissertation provides support for this dual process model of empathy by measuring empathic gains following tasks that promote intuitive or deliberate processing. It presents meta-analytic (chapter 2) and experimental (chapter 4) evidence that people intuitively respond with emotional empathy following virtual reality (VR) experiences. Such experiences depicting situations including being in a refugee camp, homeless shelter, or hospital ward lead users to feel empathy for the people depicted but does not improve their cognitive empathy.Complementary experimental evidence from a referential communication paradigm (chapter 3) demonstrates that cognitive empathy can be improved when deliberately engaged. Participants were assigned to communicate openly with their partner or listen-in to someone else's conversation (an overhearer). When participants were prevented from actively communicating, they had to engage in deliberate perspective-taking to understand what the other people meant. Following this task, over-hearers demonstrated higher performance on measures of cognitive empathy compared to interlocutors. Together these three studies demonstrate that emotional empathy is intuitively aroused whereas cognitive empathy requires engagement of deliberate effort. The proposed dual process model provides a testable explanation for why different types of empathy occur in response to different tasks. It works within the existing binary framework of cognitive and emotional empathy. It complements, rather than contradicts, the pre-existing definitions of empathy by defining the process by which each type of empathy is aroused.
590
$a
School code: 1700.
650
4
$a
Social psychology.
$3
520219
650
4
$a
Psychology.
$3
519075
650
4
$a
Personality psychology.
$3
2144789
653
$a
Affective Empathy
653
$a
Cognitive Empathy
653
$a
Dual Process
653
$a
Emotional Empathy
653
$a
Empathy
653
$a
Virtual Reality
690
$a
0451
690
$a
0621
690
$a
0625
710
2
$a
The New School.
$b
Psychology.
$3
2099084
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
82-04B.
790
$a
1700
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2020
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28087130
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9427764
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入