東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Epagoge and Paradeigma: A Rhetorical...

Johnson, Curtis.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Epagoge and Paradeigma: A Rhetorical Exegesis in the Letter of Galatians.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Epagoge and Paradeigma: A Rhetorical Exegesis in the Letter of Galatians./
作者:	Johnson, Curtis.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	235 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-12A.
標題:	Biblical studies. -
電子資源:	https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13863989
ISBN:	9781392213001

Epagoge and Paradeigma: A Rhetorical Exegesis in the Letter of Galatians.
Johnson, Curtis.

Epagoge and Paradeigma: A Rhetorical Exegesis in the Letter of Galatians. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 235 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

I argue that Paul employs personal proofs (and a non-personal one) from the past and that these proofs are analogous to rather than the opposite of the situation that took place in Galatia. I prefer to call these personal proofs "paradeigmata," which are inductive in nature are independent of one another in time and space and yet each one reinforces the other rhetorically. In addition, Paul's paradeigmata are not self-referential in the sense that he attempts to draw attention to himself or defend his apostolic authority. Instead, he employs them to establish the ethos (the truth) of his gospel he received through revelation (1:1, 12) and to support his causa and sub-issues (1:6-9, 10-12). Although I recognize that Paul employs several paradeigmata in Galatians, I will only select four for critical analysis. In the first one, Paul gives an account of his visit to Syria and Cilicia (1:21-24). Here, Paul employs an inartificial proof through the means of an example to verify the independent nature and truth of his gospel through the testimony of the Churches in Judea. In the second one, Paul employs a recent or present example of a meeting that took place in Jerusalem (2:1-10). His inclusion of the discourse are to demonstrate that he defended the truth of his gospel against the false brethren and to explain that the pillar apostles agree with his presentation of the circumcision - free gospel. In the third one, Paul constructs another recent example that transpired in Antioch (2:11-14). The emphasis in this example is Paul's recollection of the confrontation he had with Peter and perception that the truth of the gospel was at stake in Antioch. In the fourth and final one, Paul employs a historical example through the person of Abraham (3:6-9). I contend that Paul presumably counters the agitators' use of Abraham as an argument by example (3:6), and therefore Paul employs the patriarch not only as a personal example of faith but also to prove that the divine origins of his gospel antedated the law. The common thread in Paul's employment of these four paradeigmata is to state the idea more directly that the truth of the gospel is at stake.

ISBN: 9781392213001Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122820
Biblical studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Aristotle

Epagoge and Paradeigma: A Rhetorical Exegesis in the Letter of Galatians.
LDR:03428nmm a2200409 4500 001 2275953
005 20210416101956.5
008 220723s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392213001
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13863989
035 $a (MiAaPQ)lstc:10050
035 $a AAI13863989
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Johnson, Curtis. $3 3554201
245 1 0 $a Epagoge and Paradeigma: A Rhetorical Exegesis in the Letter of Galatians.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 235 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Rossing, Barbara.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a I argue that Paul employs personal proofs (and a non-personal one) from the past and that these proofs are analogous to rather than the opposite of the situation that took place in Galatia. I prefer to call these personal proofs "paradeigmata," which are inductive in nature are independent of one another in time and space and yet each one reinforces the other rhetorically. In addition, Paul's paradeigmata are not self-referential in the sense that he attempts to draw attention to himself or defend his apostolic authority. Instead, he employs them to establish the ethos (the truth) of his gospel he received through revelation (1:1, 12) and to support his causa and sub-issues (1:6-9, 10-12). Although I recognize that Paul employs several paradeigmata in Galatians, I will only select four for critical analysis. In the first one, Paul gives an account of his visit to Syria and Cilicia (1:21-24). Here, Paul employs an inartificial proof through the means of an example to verify the independent nature and truth of his gospel through the testimony of the Churches in Judea. In the second one, Paul employs a recent or present example of a meeting that took place in Jerusalem (2:1-10). His inclusion of the discourse are to demonstrate that he defended the truth of his gospel against the false brethren and to explain that the pillar apostles agree with his presentation of the circumcision - free gospel. In the third one, Paul constructs another recent example that transpired in Antioch (2:11-14). The emphasis in this example is Paul's recollection of the confrontation he had with Peter and perception that the truth of the gospel was at stake in Antioch. In the fourth and final one, Paul employs a historical example through the person of Abraham (3:6-9). I contend that Paul presumably counters the agitators' use of Abraham as an argument by example (3:6), and therefore Paul employs the patriarch not only as a personal example of faith but also to prove that the divine origins of his gospel antedated the law. The common thread in Paul's employment of these four paradeigmata is to state the idea more directly that the truth of the gospel is at stake.
590 $a School code: 0309.
650 4 $a Biblical studies. $3 2122820
650 4 $a Philosophy of religion. $2 bicssc $3 2079698
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 516647
653 $a Aristotle
653 $a Galatians
653 $a Paradeigma
653 $a Paul
653 $a Philosophy
653 $a Rhetoric
690 $a 0321
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0681
710 2 $a Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago. $b Biblical Studies. $3 3351816
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-12A.
790 $a 0309
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u https://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13863989