東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

Effects of Argumentation Prompts on ...

Malogianni, Chrysoula .

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effects of Argumentation Prompts on Alternative Positions in Ill-Structured Problem-Solving.

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Effects of Argumentation Prompts on Alternative Positions in Ill-Structured Problem-Solving./
Author:	Malogianni, Chrysoula .
Published:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
Description:	120 p.
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-08A.
Subject:	Instructional design. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27665393
ISBN:	9781392592427

Effects of Argumentation Prompts on Alternative Positions in Ill-Structured Problem-Solving.
Malogianni, Chrysoula .

Effects of Argumentation Prompts on Alternative Positions in Ill-Structured Problem-Solving. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 120 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Old Dominion University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Little is known about the role of prompts to help learners solve ill-structured learning problems. Instructors do not devote adequate time to formulate pedagogically useful prompts, and the usefulness of different types of prompt is unclear. The question of whether prompt variation can generate superior argumentative depth has not been resolved. This mixed-methods study, using quantitative and qualitative data collected from 32 students, examined the role of argumentative prompts in the writing of essays based on business case studies. The research questions were: Is there a significant relationship between the type of argumentative prompt and argumentative depth? Is there a significant mediating effect of the frequency of alternative positions on the relationship between argumentative prompt type and argumentative depth? How are types of argumentation strategies utilized within alternative positions as represented in rhetorical prompts versus dialectical prompts? A significant (p < .001) relationship with a large effect size was found between the type of argumentative prompt (rhetorical and dialectical) and argumentative depth. Alternative argumentative positions were found to significantly (p < .001) mediate the relationship between argumentative prompt type argumentative depth with a large effect size. Verification and elaboration strategies were utilized in a similar way across both rhetorical and dialectical prompts. Dialectical prompts did not appear to be more effective than rhetorical prompts when using the evidence strategies. Rebuttal appeared to be utilized more in response to dialectical prompts. The implications are that instructors should ensure that both rhetorical and dialectal prompts are provided in assignments involving ill-structured learning problems.

ISBN: 9781392592427Subjects--Topical Terms:

3172279
Instructional design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Argumentation prompts

Effects of Argumentation Prompts on Alternative Positions in Ill-Structured Problem-Solving.
LDR:02978nmm a2200361 4500 001 2274434
005 20201202125021.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392592427
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27665393
035 $a AAI27665393
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Malogianni, Chrysoula . $3 3551922
245 1 0 $a Effects of Argumentation Prompts on Alternative Positions in Ill-Structured Problem-Solving.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 120 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Luo, Tian.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Old Dominion University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Little is known about the role of prompts to help learners solve ill-structured learning problems. Instructors do not devote adequate time to formulate pedagogically useful prompts, and the usefulness of different types of prompt is unclear. The question of whether prompt variation can generate superior argumentative depth has not been resolved. This mixed-methods study, using quantitative and qualitative data collected from 32 students, examined the role of argumentative prompts in the writing of essays based on business case studies. The research questions were: Is there a significant relationship between the type of argumentative prompt and argumentative depth? Is there a significant mediating effect of the frequency of alternative positions on the relationship between argumentative prompt type and argumentative depth? How are types of argumentation strategies utilized within alternative positions as represented in rhetorical prompts versus dialectical prompts? A significant (p < .001) relationship with a large effect size was found between the type of argumentative prompt (rhetorical and dialectical) and argumentative depth. Alternative argumentative positions were found to significantly (p < .001) mediate the relationship between argumentative prompt type argumentative depth with a large effect size. Verification and elaboration strategies were utilized in a similar way across both rhetorical and dialectical prompts. Dialectical prompts did not appear to be more effective than rhetorical prompts when using the evidence strategies. Rebuttal appeared to be utilized more in response to dialectical prompts. The implications are that instructors should ensure that both rhetorical and dialectal prompts are provided in assignments involving ill-structured learning problems.
590 $a School code: 0418.
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 3172279
653 $a Argumentation prompts
653 $a Case-studies
653 $a Dialectical prompt
653 $a Ill-structured problems
653 $a Problem solving
653 $a Rhetorical prompts
690 $a 0447
710 2 $a Old Dominion University. $b STEM and Professional Studies. $3 3190332
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-08A.
790 $a 0418
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27665393