東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Figures of Narcissus and Faust i...

Johnson, Jill.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Figures of Narcissus and Faust in Literature and Film.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Figures of Narcissus and Faust in Literature and Film./
作者:	Johnson, Jill.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	244 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-09, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-09A.
標題:	Classical studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13849165
ISBN:	9780438962781

The Figures of Narcissus and Faust in Literature and Film.
Johnson, Jill.

The Figures of Narcissus and Faust in Literature and Film. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 244 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-09, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Dallas, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The legends and myths of the past continue to dominate cultural thought and shared storytelling. Two of the most key figures in these myths are Narcissus and Faust. They continue to dominate stories that are told. When looking at Faustian stories, I examine and bring to the fore the layered aspect of the Faust character. In my interpretation, Faust, the character and concept, is related to the other mythological figure: Narcissus. Establishing the connection between the myths of Narcissus and Faust in my first chapter, I show how this approach aids in interpreting Faust, especially as this character appears in other stories. In most tales Faust is a Narcissus, which directs certain aspects of his narrative. He will appeal to others with his described physical beauty, enthrall the other characters as Narcissus does, obsess over himself, and cause his own destruction. To investigate the connection between Faust and Narcissus, I examine four philosophical novels from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818), Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890), Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness (1899), and Klaus Mann's Mephisto (1936); moreover, I focus on the ways these two myths influence the characters in each of these novels. I have selected these books because they are usually addressed by critics as solely philosophical. Many critics approach these books by looking at the abstract within the texts, treating them as novels of ideas. They focus almost exclusively on the philosophical, abstract behind the characters, often neglecting some of the concrete elements in the stories. I want to consider the characters of these stories from a different perspective. I focus on the representation of the characters' (especially the main characters') bodies. The central importance of the physical body to the myth of Narcissus necessitates this approach. The body of Narcissus, and by extension Faust, is what allows for Narcissus' obsession and his destruction. Any story with this type of character present requires focus on the body. However, the representation of the character's physical body is different in literature than in film. Along with the novels, I consider the film adaptations Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (Branagh, 1994), The Picture of Dorian Gray (Lewin, 1945), Apocalypse Now (Coppola, 1979), and Mephisto (Szabo, 1981). By looking at the adaptations, I more closely investigate the strategies of representation between these two mediums, which helps to show different aspects of both Faust and Narcissus. In this way, I analyze the films' approach to the connection between these two myths.

ISBN: 9780438962781Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122826
Classical studies.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Adaptation

The Figures of Narcissus and Faust in Literature and Film.
LDR:04124nmm a2200469 4500 001 2274206
005 20201120093342.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438962781
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13849165
035 $a (MiAaPQ)0382vireo:761Johnson
035 $a AAI13849165
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Johnson, Jill. $3 3551674
245 1 4 $a The Figures of Narcissus and Faust in Literature and Film.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 244 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-09, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Ozsvath, Zsuzsanna.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Texas at Dallas, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a The legends and myths of the past continue to dominate cultural thought and shared storytelling. Two of the most key figures in these myths are Narcissus and Faust. They continue to dominate stories that are told. When looking at Faustian stories, I examine and bring to the fore the layered aspect of the Faust character. In my interpretation, Faust, the character and concept, is related to the other mythological figure: Narcissus. Establishing the connection between the myths of Narcissus and Faust in my first chapter, I show how this approach aids in interpreting Faust, especially as this character appears in other stories. In most tales Faust is a Narcissus, which directs certain aspects of his narrative. He will appeal to others with his described physical beauty, enthrall the other characters as Narcissus does, obsess over himself, and cause his own destruction. To investigate the connection between Faust and Narcissus, I examine four philosophical novels from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries: Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (1818), Oscar Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890), Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness (1899), and Klaus Mann's Mephisto (1936); moreover, I focus on the ways these two myths influence the characters in each of these novels. I have selected these books because they are usually addressed by critics as solely philosophical. Many critics approach these books by looking at the abstract within the texts, treating them as novels of ideas. They focus almost exclusively on the philosophical, abstract behind the characters, often neglecting some of the concrete elements in the stories. I want to consider the characters of these stories from a different perspective. I focus on the representation of the characters' (especially the main characters') bodies. The central importance of the physical body to the myth of Narcissus necessitates this approach. The body of Narcissus, and by extension Faust, is what allows for Narcissus' obsession and his destruction. Any story with this type of character present requires focus on the body. However, the representation of the character's physical body is different in literature than in film. Along with the novels, I consider the film adaptations Mary Shelley's Frankenstein (Branagh, 1994), The Picture of Dorian Gray (Lewin, 1945), Apocalypse Now (Coppola, 1979), and Mephisto (Szabo, 1981). By looking at the adaptations, I more closely investigate the strategies of representation between these two mediums, which helps to show different aspects of both Faust and Narcissus. In this way, I analyze the films' approach to the connection between these two myths.
590 $a School code: 0382.
650 4 $a Classical studies. $3 2122826
650 4 $a Modern literature. $3 2122750
650 4 $a Literature. $3 537498
653 $a Adaptation
653 $a Apocalypse Now
653 $a Echo
653 $a Faust
653 $a Heart of Darkness
653 $a Mephisto
653 $a Narcissus
653 $a The Picture of Dorian Gray
653 $a The body
653 $a Women studies
690 $a 0294
690 $a 0298
690 $a 0401
710 2 $a The University of Texas at Dallas. $b Humanities - Studies in Literature. $3 3551675
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-09A.
790 $a 0382
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13849165