東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Effect of Single Goal versus Multipl...

Hoover, Anna.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Effect of Single Goal versus Multiple Goal Dietary Interventions on Diet Quality Measures during Pregnancy.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Effect of Single Goal versus Multiple Goal Dietary Interventions on Diet Quality Measures during Pregnancy./
作者:	Hoover, Anna.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	79 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-01.
標題:	Nutrition. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27961801
ISBN:	9798661788016

Effect of Single Goal versus Multiple Goal Dietary Interventions on Diet Quality Measures during Pregnancy.
Hoover, Anna.

Effect of Single Goal versus Multiple Goal Dietary Interventions on Diet Quality Measures during Pregnancy. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 79 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Kansas, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Background: During pregnancy, over 50% of women gain more than is recommended based on the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) guidelines. There is no consensus on dietary interventions to prevent excessive gestational weight gain (GWG). Excessive GWG is associated with development of gestational diabetes (GDM), hypertension, and can also result in high infant birth weight. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in the ability of a single goal (SG) vs multiple goal (MG) intervention to improve diet quality and maintain micronutrient status. Design: Pregnant women were randomized within two pilot trials to an intervention, MG (n = 21) and SG (n = 16), or usual care (UC, n = 18 combined). The MG intervention included traditional lifestyle counseling methods incorporating several nutrition topics, as well as physical activity. The SG intervention solely focused on increasing dietary fiber (> 30gm/day). Both interventions included instruction by registered dietitians. Twenty-four-hour dietary recalls were collected for the three groups and three diet quality measures were calculated, including the AHEI-2010, AHEI- P (2005), and AHEI-P (2010). Results: At study end, the SG group saw improvement in all three diet quality measures (p < 0.009) and the MG group saw improvement in two diet quality measures (AHEI-2010 & AHEI-P-2010, p 0.05). There was no significant difference in calcium, folate, or iron status between the groups. Conclusions: A SG intervention focusing on fiber during pregnancy may be a simple approach to increasing diet quality. More research on SG interventions is needed.

ISBN: 9798661788016Subjects--Topical Terms:

517777
Nutrition.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Single goal vs. multiple goal

Effect of Single Goal versus Multiple Goal Dietary Interventions on Diet Quality Measures during Pregnancy.
LDR:02758nmm a2200349 4500 001 2274163
005 20201120111345.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798661788016
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27961801
035 $a AAI27961801
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Hoover, Anna. $3 3551631
245 1 0 $a Effect of Single Goal versus Multiple Goal Dietary Interventions on Diet Quality Measures during Pregnancy.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 79 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.
500 $a Advisor: Hull, Holly.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Kansas, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Background: During pregnancy, over 50% of women gain more than is recommended based on the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) guidelines. There is no consensus on dietary interventions to prevent excessive gestational weight gain (GWG). Excessive GWG is associated with development of gestational diabetes (GDM), hypertension, and can also result in high infant birth weight. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference in the ability of a single goal (SG) vs multiple goal (MG) intervention to improve diet quality and maintain micronutrient status. Design: Pregnant women were randomized within two pilot trials to an intervention, MG (n = 21) and SG (n = 16), or usual care (UC, n = 18 combined). The MG intervention included traditional lifestyle counseling methods incorporating several nutrition topics, as well as physical activity. The SG intervention solely focused on increasing dietary fiber (> 30gm/day). Both interventions included instruction by registered dietitians. Twenty-four-hour dietary recalls were collected for the three groups and three diet quality measures were calculated, including the AHEI-2010, AHEI- P (2005), and AHEI-P (2010). Results: At study end, the SG group saw improvement in all three diet quality measures (p < 0.009) and the MG group saw improvement in two diet quality measures (AHEI-2010 & AHEI-P-2010, p 0.05). There was no significant difference in calcium, folate, or iron status between the groups. Conclusions: A SG intervention focusing on fiber during pregnancy may be a simple approach to increasing diet quality. More research on SG interventions is needed.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Nutrition. $3 517777
650 4 $a Obstetrics. $3 634501
653 $a Single goal vs. multiple goal
653 $a Dietary interventions
653 $a Diet quality measures
653 $a Pregnancy
690 $a 0570
690 $a 0380
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Dietetics & Nutrition. $3 3173062
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-01.
790 $a 0099
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27961801