東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Selling Protest in the News? Movemen...

Butz, Andrew David.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Selling Protest in the News? Movement-media Framing of Occupations: An Exploratory Study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Selling Protest in the News? Movement-media Framing of Occupations: An Exploratory Study./
作者:	Butz, Andrew David.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	165 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-03A.
標題:	Journalism. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10831092
ISBN:	9780438359857

Selling Protest in the News? Movement-media Framing of Occupations: An Exploratory Study.
Butz, Andrew David.

Selling Protest in the News? Movement-media Framing of Occupations: An Exploratory Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 165 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Portland State University, 2018.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Using quantitative content analysis, this study explores social movement (SM) framing in commercial news media - by comparing how leading newspapers covered prominent protest occupations in 2011 and 2016. More than other SMs, anti-systemic protests like the 2011 Occupy Wall Street (OWS) and the 2016 Malheur Refuge Occupation (MRO) only have partial frame-setting agency, raising a broad theory question (to inform the research questions below): If SMs and media relate as interacting systems, are protest news frames more movement- or more media- driven; and do media not just enable but also constrain SMs? With the movement-media theory question above, the study design adapts media opportunity structure (MOS) to model a hierarchy of influences on news coverage of ideologically opposed or "distant twin" OWS and MRO, as 40- to 60-day protest occupations. The focused research question - exploring media's constraining potential - asks if commercial news framing of collective action: i) commercially frames or "sells" even anti-corporate protest; or ii) instead marginalizes or neutralizes such protest? Coverage from three top national or state newspapers (The New York Times, USA Today, and The Oregonian) was analyzed randomly from all protest stories during the occupations. Sampled time periods in 2011 and 2016, during actual encampments/ occupations in Portland, OR and New York City (OWS) and in Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon (MRO), also correspond with transitional years in print news. The inductive-based comparative results, from 15 coding dimensions for news framing of collective action, dispersed passivity, and commercially-framed activism, showed some evidence for the "selling protest" question. And the compiled summary Framing Advantages and Disadvantages yield this study's key finding: Although anti-corporate OWS was far larger, with more widespread media coverage, the comparative overall media frame for the small, remote, anti-government MRO was far more potent and resonant. Comparing media-and-movement framing of these distant twin 40-day protest occupations finds some support for the "selling (or underselling) protest" question. This comparative frame analysis helps bridge micro- and macro-theory levels, addressing an enduring dual gap in movement-media research literature - to yield insight on SMs' and media's respective roles in protest news framing and then identify potential mechanisms for future research.

ISBN: 9780438359857Subjects--Topical Terms:

576107
Journalism.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Comparative frame analysis

Selling Protest in the News? Movement-media Framing of Occupations: An Exploratory Study.
LDR:03862nmm a2200421 4500 001 2274028
005 20201120111310.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438359857
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10831092
035 $a (MiAaPQ)psu:12162
035 $a AAI10831092
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Butz, Andrew David. $3 3551491
245 1 0 $a Selling Protest in the News? Movement-media Framing of Occupations: An Exploratory Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 165 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Liebman, Robert.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Portland State University, 2018.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Using quantitative content analysis, this study explores social movement (SM) framing in commercial news media - by comparing how leading newspapers covered prominent protest occupations in 2011 and 2016. More than other SMs, anti-systemic protests like the 2011 Occupy Wall Street (OWS) and the 2016 Malheur Refuge Occupation (MRO) only have partial frame-setting agency, raising a broad theory question (to inform the research questions below): If SMs and media relate as interacting systems, are protest news frames more movement- or more media- driven; and do media not just enable but also constrain SMs? With the movement-media theory question above, the study design adapts media opportunity structure (MOS) to model a hierarchy of influences on news coverage of ideologically opposed or "distant twin" OWS and MRO, as 40- to 60-day protest occupations. The focused research question - exploring media's constraining potential - asks if commercial news framing of collective action: i) commercially frames or "sells" even anti-corporate protest; or ii) instead marginalizes or neutralizes such protest? Coverage from three top national or state newspapers (The New York Times, USA Today, and The Oregonian) was analyzed randomly from all protest stories during the occupations. Sampled time periods in 2011 and 2016, during actual encampments/ occupations in Portland, OR and New York City (OWS) and in Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, Oregon (MRO), also correspond with transitional years in print news. The inductive-based comparative results, from 15 coding dimensions for news framing of collective action, dispersed passivity, and commercially-framed activism, showed some evidence for the "selling protest" question. And the compiled summary Framing Advantages and Disadvantages yield this study's key finding: Although anti-corporate OWS was far larger, with more widespread media coverage, the comparative overall media frame for the small, remote, anti-government MRO was far more potent and resonant. Comparing media-and-movement framing of these distant twin 40-day protest occupations finds some support for the "selling (or underselling) protest" question. This comparative frame analysis helps bridge micro- and macro-theory levels, addressing an enduring dual gap in movement-media research literature - to yield insight on SMs' and media's respective roles in protest news framing and then identify potential mechanisms for future research.
590 $a School code: 0180.
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
650 4 $a Sociology. $3 516174
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 3422380
653 $a Comparative frame analysis
653 $a Malheur refuge occupation
653 $a News media
653 $a Occupy wall street
653 $a Protest
653 $a Social movements
690 $a 0391
690 $a 0626
690 $a 0708
710 2 $a Portland State University. $b Sociology. $3 3176024
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-03A.
790 $a 0180
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10831092