東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Swimming Performance Post Blood Flow...

Boettcher, Amy E.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Swimming Performance Post Blood Flow Restriction Training in Collegiate Swimmers.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Swimming Performance Post Blood Flow Restriction Training in Collegiate Swimmers./
作者:	Boettcher, Amy E.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	53 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-08.
標題:	Physiology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27790438
ISBN:	9781392696194

Swimming Performance Post Blood Flow Restriction Training in Collegiate Swimmers.
Boettcher, Amy E.

Swimming Performance Post Blood Flow Restriction Training in Collegiate Swimmers. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 53 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08.

Thesis (M.S.)--Northern Michigan University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

PURPOSE: To determine if blood flow restriction (BFR) training improved performance and physiological factors in collegiate swimmers. METHODS: Participants (n=10) separated into 2 groups (control [CON] & experimental [OCC]), completed 9 supervised trainings within 3 weeks. Pre- and post-testing included: VO2max, Wingate, swim time trials (TT), strength, and DEXA. Training was identical except OCC underwent bilateral thigh BFR [blood pressure (BP) cuffs inflated 70-90% of systolic BP]. Training: treadmill walking 20 minutes (5x3-minutes at 3 mph, 5% grade, 1-minute rest), followed by bodyweight strength training (squats, lunges & step-ups). Pain levels (scale: 1-10) were taken after the second set of lunges, cuff inflated (PainA), and after all lunges, cuff deflated (PainB). Paired t-tests determined significant change within groups, independent t-tests determined significance between groups, ReANOVA determined significance of pain levels. RESULTS: Both groups increased 1 RM leg press CON: 18.0 ± 8.155 (kg) (p=0.008) and OCC: 15.200 ± 5.805 (p=0.004); 1 RM chest press (kg) increased significantly in OCC (p=0.031). Mean peak power (W/kg) increased 1.530 ± 2.389 (p=0.225) CON and 3.772 ± 3.088 OCC (p=0.052). Pain levels were significantly different between days (p=0.012), and between PainA vs PainB (p=0.008). No significant change in swimming TT, VO2max, total work, fatigue index, or body fat occurred. CONCLUSION: This BFR training program did not improve swimming performance but indicated adaptation to pain may occur.

ISBN: 9781392696194Subjects--Topical Terms:

518431
Physiology.

Swimming Performance Post Blood Flow Restriction Training in Collegiate Swimmers.
LDR:02536nmm a2200313 4500 001 2273949
005 20201109125355.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392696194
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27790438
035 $a (MiAaPQ)N_Mich_U1603
035 $a AAI27790438
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Boettcher, Amy E. $3 3551409
245 1 0 $a Swimming Performance Post Blood Flow Restriction Training in Collegiate Swimmers.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 53 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-08.
500 $a Advisor: um, Scott.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Northern Michigan University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a PURPOSE: To determine if blood flow restriction (BFR) training improved performance and physiological factors in collegiate swimmers. METHODS: Participants (n=10) separated into 2 groups (control [CON] & experimental [OCC]), completed 9 supervised trainings within 3 weeks. Pre- and post-testing included: VO2max, Wingate, swim time trials (TT), strength, and DEXA. Training was identical except OCC underwent bilateral thigh BFR [blood pressure (BP) cuffs inflated 70-90% of systolic BP]. Training: treadmill walking 20 minutes (5x3-minutes at 3 mph, 5% grade, 1-minute rest), followed by bodyweight strength training (squats, lunges & step-ups). Pain levels (scale: 1-10) were taken after the second set of lunges, cuff inflated (PainA), and after all lunges, cuff deflated (PainB). Paired t-tests determined significant change within groups, independent t-tests determined significance between groups, ReANOVA determined significance of pain levels. RESULTS: Both groups increased 1 RM leg press CON: 18.0 ± 8.155 (kg) (p=0.008) and OCC: 15.200 ± 5.805 (p=0.004); 1 RM chest press (kg) increased significantly in OCC (p=0.031). Mean peak power (W/kg) increased 1.530 ± 2.389 (p=0.225) CON and 3.772 ± 3.088 OCC (p=0.052). Pain levels were significantly different between days (p=0.012), and between PainA vs PainB (p=0.008). No significant change in swimming TT, VO2max, total work, fatigue index, or body fat occurred. CONCLUSION: This BFR training program did not improve swimming performance but indicated adaptation to pain may occur.
590 $a School code: 0375.
650 4 $a Physiology. $3 518431
650 4 $a College sports. $3 571783
650 4 $a Kinesiology. $3 517627
690 $a 0575
690 $a 0719
710 2 $a Northern Michigan University. $3 1262996
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-08.
790 $a 0375
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27790438