東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Witnesses Experience Decision Ma...

Good, Mary.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Witnesses Experience Decision Making in Situations of Workplace Bullying: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Witnesses Experience Decision Making in Situations of Workplace Bullying: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis./
作者:	Good, Mary.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	127 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-03B.
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13900774
ISBN:	9781085735025

How Witnesses Experience Decision Making in Situations of Workplace Bullying: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
Good, Mary.

How Witnesses Experience Decision Making in Situations of Workplace Bullying: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 127 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This paper explored how witnesses experienced workplace bullying in the federal government and how they decided to respond to it. An interpretative phenomenological analysis approach was taken with a homogeneous group of six senior level federal employees. Private, in-depth interviews were conducted to learn, in detail, how each witness experienced the bullying and decision-making phenomenon. Each participant tried to make sense of, or understand, the bullying that they witnessed and then figure out why they responded the way that they did. Interview transcripts were analysed through a systematic qualitative analysis. Participant narratives converged on three superordinate themes: undesirable feelings, ethical considerations, and workplace policies and social norms. While the participants' "sense-making" was first-order, the researcher's sense-making and interpretations were second-order. Second-order allowed the researcher to use an outside theoretical viewpoint to explain the decision-making phenomenon. While all of the interpretations were grounded in the transcripts, a deeper level of analysis shed light on not only how witnesses experienced the phenomenon, but why they made the decisions that they did to respond to the bullying. A translation of "The Personal Impact of Ethical Decisions: A Social Impact Theory" (Baack, Fogliasso, & Harris, 2000) was used by the researcher in the interpretation. Participants experienced the decision-making process in response to workplace bullying as an ethical dilemma occurring within an ethically permissive environment.

ISBN: 9781085735025Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Workplace bullying

How Witnesses Experience Decision Making in Situations of Workplace Bullying: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
LDR:02820nmm a2200349 4500 001 2273728
005 20201110120241.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085735025
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13900774
035 $a AAI13900774
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Good, Mary. $3 3551179
245 1 0 $a How Witnesses Experience Decision Making in Situations of Workplace Bullying: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 127 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Scott, Elizabeth.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Chicago School of Professional Psychology, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
520 $a This paper explored how witnesses experienced workplace bullying in the federal government and how they decided to respond to it. An interpretative phenomenological analysis approach was taken with a homogeneous group of six senior level federal employees. Private, in-depth interviews were conducted to learn, in detail, how each witness experienced the bullying and decision-making phenomenon. Each participant tried to make sense of, or understand, the bullying that they witnessed and then figure out why they responded the way that they did. Interview transcripts were analysed through a systematic qualitative analysis. Participant narratives converged on three superordinate themes: undesirable feelings, ethical considerations, and workplace policies and social norms. While the participants' "sense-making" was first-order, the researcher's sense-making and interpretations were second-order. Second-order allowed the researcher to use an outside theoretical viewpoint to explain the decision-making phenomenon. While all of the interpretations were grounded in the transcripts, a deeper level of analysis shed light on not only how witnesses experienced the phenomenon, but why they made the decisions that they did to respond to the bullying. A translation of "The Personal Impact of Ethical Decisions: A Social Impact Theory" (Baack, Fogliasso, & Harris, 2000) was used by the researcher in the interpretation. Participants experienced the decision-making process in response to workplace bullying as an ethical dilemma occurring within an ethically permissive environment.
590 $a School code: 0971.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Occupational psychology. $3 2122852
653 $a Workplace bullying
653 $a Federal government
653 $a Participant narratives
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0624
710 2 $a The Chicago School of Professional Psychology. $b Organizational Leadership. $3 2092506
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-03B.
790 $a 0971
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13900774