東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Do People Process and Share Fake...

Kim, Se Jung.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Do People Process and Share Fake News on Social Media? On the Context of Dual-Process of Credibility with Partisanship, Cognitive Appraisal to Threat, and Corrective Action.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Do People Process and Share Fake News on Social Media? On the Context of Dual-Process of Credibility with Partisanship, Cognitive Appraisal to Threat, and Corrective Action./
作者:	Kim, Se Jung.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	98 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-04.
標題:	Communication. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28092108
ISBN:	9798672192703

How Do People Process and Share Fake News on Social Media? On the Context of Dual-Process of Credibility with Partisanship, Cognitive Appraisal to Threat, and Corrective Action.
Kim, Se Jung.

How Do People Process and Share Fake News on Social Media? On the Context of Dual-Process of Credibility with Partisanship, Cognitive Appraisal to Threat, and Corrective Action. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 98 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--Syracuse University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The objective of this study is to examine how the information processing of news users happens on social media in the context of spreading fake news. This study is intended to shed light on how fake news spreads on social media with the effects of two moderators (i.e., partisanship and source credibility) from political attitude consistency to message credibility and the effect of mediation (i.e., cognitive appraisal to threat) from message credibility to intent to share fake news on social media and corrective action. As a theoretical lens, dual-process theories were adopted in this paper. For this, a 2 (news topic: Immigration vs. Gun control) x 2 (news topic stance: Positive vs. Negative) x 2 (source: major (i.e., Associated Press) vs. minor (i.e., blog news) between-subject online experiment with 507 participants was conducted for both immigration and gun control topics. As a result, in the moderation effects, although partisanship was significant for both topic immigration and gun control news, source credibility was significant only for immigration news. Plus, the mediation effect of the cognitive appraisal to threats was significant between message credibility and the intent to share fake news on social media for both news topics. Lastly, even though the relations between message credibility and corrective action had to be negatively associated, they were positively correlated.

ISBN: 9798672192703Subjects--Topical Terms:

524709
Communication.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Credibility

How Do People Process and Share Fake News on Social Media? On the Context of Dual-Process of Credibility with Partisanship, Cognitive Appraisal to Threat, and Corrective Action.
LDR:02624nmm a2200373 4500 001 2271811
005 20201030112756.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798672192703
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28092108
035 $a AAI28092108
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kim, Se Jung. $3 3549226
245 1 0 $a How Do People Process and Share Fake News on Social Media? On the Context of Dual-Process of Credibility with Partisanship, Cognitive Appraisal to Threat, and Corrective Action.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 98 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-04.
500 $a Advisor: Chock, T. Makana.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Syracuse University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The objective of this study is to examine how the information processing of news users happens on social media in the context of spreading fake news. This study is intended to shed light on how fake news spreads on social media with the effects of two moderators (i.e., partisanship and source credibility) from political attitude consistency to message credibility and the effect of mediation (i.e., cognitive appraisal to threat) from message credibility to intent to share fake news on social media and corrective action. As a theoretical lens, dual-process theories were adopted in this paper. For this, a 2 (news topic: Immigration vs. Gun control) x 2 (news topic stance: Positive vs. Negative) x 2 (source: major (i.e., Associated Press) vs. minor (i.e., blog news) between-subject online experiment with 507 participants was conducted for both immigration and gun control topics. As a result, in the moderation effects, although partisanship was significant for both topic immigration and gun control news, source credibility was significant only for immigration news. Plus, the mediation effect of the cognitive appraisal to threats was significant between message credibility and the intent to share fake news on social media for both news topics. Lastly, even though the relations between message credibility and corrective action had to be negatively associated, they were positively correlated.
590 $a School code: 0659.
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 3422380
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 2122754
653 $a Credibility
653 $a Dual-process theory
653 $a Fake news
653 $a Partisanship
653 $a Social media
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0708
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a Syracuse University. $b Media Studies. $3 2097879
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-04.
790 $a 0659
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28092108