東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Risk assessment in the upstream crud...

Briggs, Charles Awoala.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Risk assessment in the upstream crude oil supply chain: Leveraging analytic hierarchy process.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Risk assessment in the upstream crude oil supply chain: Leveraging analytic hierarchy process./
作者:	Briggs, Charles Awoala.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2010,
面頁冊數:	225 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International72-04A.
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3420520
ISBN:	9781124173832

Risk assessment in the upstream crude oil supply chain: Leveraging analytic hierarchy process.
Briggs, Charles Awoala.

Risk assessment in the upstream crude oil supply chain: Leveraging analytic hierarchy process. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2010 - 225 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Dakota State University, 2010.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

For an organization to be successful, an effective strategy is required, and if implemented appropriately the strategy will result in a sustainable competitive advantage. The importance of decision making in the oil industry is reflected in the magnitude and nature of the industry. Specific features of the oil industry supply chain, such as its longer chain, the complexity of its transportation system, its complex production and storage processes, etc., pose challenges to its effective management. Hence, understanding the risks, the risk sources, and their potential impacts on the oil industry's operations will be helpful in proposing a risk management model for the upstream oil supply chain. The risk-based model in this research uses a three-level analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a multiple-attribute decision-making technique, to underline the importance of risk analysis and risk management in the upstream crude oil supply chain. Level 1 represents the overall goal of risk management; Level 2 is comprised of the various risk factors; and Level 3 represents the alternative criteria of the decision maker as indicated on the hierarchical structure of the crude oil supply chain. Several risk management experts from different oil companies around the world were surveyed, and six major types of supply chain risks were identified: (1) exploration and production, (2) environmental and regulatory compliance, (3) transportation, (4) availability of oil, (5) geopolitical, and (6) reputational. Also identified are the preferred methods of managing risks which include; (1) accept and control the risks, (2) avoid the risk by stopping the activity, or (3) transfer or share the risks to other companies or insurers. The results from the survey indicate that the most important risk to manage is transportation risk with a priority of .263, followed by exploration/production with priority of .198, with an overall inconsistency of .03. With respect to major objectives the most preferred risk management policy option based on the result of the composite score is accept and control risk with a priority of .446, followed by transfer or share risk with a priority of .303. The least likely option is to terminate or forgo activity with a priority of .251.

ISBN: 9781124173832Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Analytic hierarchy

Risk assessment in the upstream crude oil supply chain: Leveraging analytic hierarchy process.
LDR:03585nmm a2200409 4500 001 2270922
005 20201007134039.5
008 220629s2010 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781124173832
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3420520
035 $a AAI3420520
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Briggs, Charles Awoala. $3 3548304
245 1 0 $a Risk assessment in the upstream crude oil supply chain: Leveraging analytic hierarchy process.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2010
300 $a 225 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 72-04, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Tolliver, Denver.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--North Dakota State University, 2010.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a For an organization to be successful, an effective strategy is required, and if implemented appropriately the strategy will result in a sustainable competitive advantage. The importance of decision making in the oil industry is reflected in the magnitude and nature of the industry. Specific features of the oil industry supply chain, such as its longer chain, the complexity of its transportation system, its complex production and storage processes, etc., pose challenges to its effective management. Hence, understanding the risks, the risk sources, and their potential impacts on the oil industry's operations will be helpful in proposing a risk management model for the upstream oil supply chain. The risk-based model in this research uses a three-level analytic hierarchy process (AHP), a multiple-attribute decision-making technique, to underline the importance of risk analysis and risk management in the upstream crude oil supply chain. Level 1 represents the overall goal of risk management; Level 2 is comprised of the various risk factors; and Level 3 represents the alternative criteria of the decision maker as indicated on the hierarchical structure of the crude oil supply chain. Several risk management experts from different oil companies around the world were surveyed, and six major types of supply chain risks were identified: (1) exploration and production, (2) environmental and regulatory compliance, (3) transportation, (4) availability of oil, (5) geopolitical, and (6) reputational. Also identified are the preferred methods of managing risks which include; (1) accept and control the risks, (2) avoid the risk by stopping the activity, or (3) transfer or share the risks to other companies or insurers. The results from the survey indicate that the most important risk to manage is transportation risk with a priority of .263, followed by exploration/production with priority of .198, with an overall inconsistency of .03. With respect to major objectives the most preferred risk management policy option based on the result of the composite score is accept and control risk with a priority of .446, followed by transfer or share risk with a priority of .303. The least likely option is to terminate or forgo activity with a priority of .251.
590 $a School code: 0157.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Transportation planning. $3 3423850
650 4 $a Energy. $3 876794
650 4 $a Operations research. $3 547123
653 $a Analytic hierarchy
653 $a Oil spills & environment
653 $a Oil supply chain
653 $a Oil transportation
653 $a Risk assessment
653 $a Supply chain risk
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0709
690 $a 0791
690 $a 0796
710 2 $a North Dakota State University. $3 1021724
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 72-04A.
790 $a 0157
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2010
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3420520