東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Kor...

Park, Sung Yong.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Korean Version of the Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale-Racial Diversity Form (K-MCSE-RD) for Korean Counselors.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Cross-Cultural Validation of the Korean Version of the Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale-Racial Diversity Form (K-MCSE-RD) for Korean Counselors./
作者:	Park, Sung Yong.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	123 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12B.
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27962202
ISBN:	9798617071391

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Korean Version of the Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale-Racial Diversity Form (K-MCSE-RD) for Korean Counselors.
Park, Sung Yong.

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Korean Version of the Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale-Racial Diversity Form (K-MCSE-RD) for Korean Counselors. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 123 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Albany, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Faced with growing racial and ethnic diversity in South Korea, the demand for culturally competent counseling services by multicultural clients has increased. The current study aims to contribute to the research of multicultural counseling and multicultural counselor training by examining psychometric properties of the culturally adapted Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale-Racial Diversity form for use in South Korea. The purposes of the study were threefold: (a) establish content validity during the translation and cross-cultural adaptation stage for the MCSE-RD to the context of multicultural counseling in South Korea; (b) test plausible underlying factor structures and report internal consistency reliability estimates of the K-MCSE-RD scores; and (c) examine concurrent criterion-related validity of the K-MCSE-RD score through the testing of a social cognitive model of multicultural counseling interests and choice goals. In Phase I, a total of 17 professionals participated in translation procedures, including forward-backward translations, translation equivalence tests, adaptation, and content validation. These procedures for developing K-MCSE-RD established evidence for its content validity and yielded the final Korean version. In Phase II, data were collected from 391 counselors and trainees. Results of confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a bifactor structure of the K-MCSE-RD scores that are explained by general counseling skills and three dimensions of multicultural counseling self-efficacy: Multicultural Intervention, Multicultural Assessment, and Multicultural Counseling Session Management. The reliability estimates examined by Cronbach's alpha and omega coefficients showed that the K-MCSE-RD subscales and total scores provided adequate internal consistency. Next, structural equation modeling analyses confirmed the overall adequacy of the social cognitive model in predicting multicultural counseling interests and choice goals. Specifically, support of concurrent validity was also found for the social cognitive model in which person-cognitive variables (self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and interests, in the contexts of multicultural counseling) mediated the effects of prior multicultural counseling experiences and perceptions of multicultural training environments on intentions for engagement in future multicultural counseling. In conclusion, psychometric properties of the K-MCSE-RD were established by empirical evidences of three validity types (i.e., content, construct, and concurrent validity) and reliability. This study contributes the theoretical extension of social cognitive theory to the multicultural counseling domain and its application for Korean counselor samples. Practical implications for mental health practitioners and counseling educators, limitations, and directions for future research are provided.

ISBN: 9798617071391Subjects--Topical Terms:

517650
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Confirmatory factor analysis

Cross-Cultural Validation of the Korean Version of the Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale-Racial Diversity Form (K-MCSE-RD) for Korean Counselors.
LDR:04214nmm a2200373 4500 001 2270650
005 20200930060357.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798617071391
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27962202
035 $a AAI27962202
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Park, Sung Yong. $3 3548030
245 1 0 $a Cross-Cultural Validation of the Korean Version of the Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale-Racial Diversity Form (K-MCSE-RD) for Korean Counselors.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 123 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Sheu, Hung-Bin.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Albany, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Faced with growing racial and ethnic diversity in South Korea, the demand for culturally competent counseling services by multicultural clients has increased. The current study aims to contribute to the research of multicultural counseling and multicultural counselor training by examining psychometric properties of the culturally adapted Multicultural Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale-Racial Diversity form for use in South Korea. The purposes of the study were threefold: (a) establish content validity during the translation and cross-cultural adaptation stage for the MCSE-RD to the context of multicultural counseling in South Korea; (b) test plausible underlying factor structures and report internal consistency reliability estimates of the K-MCSE-RD scores; and (c) examine concurrent criterion-related validity of the K-MCSE-RD score through the testing of a social cognitive model of multicultural counseling interests and choice goals. In Phase I, a total of 17 professionals participated in translation procedures, including forward-backward translations, translation equivalence tests, adaptation, and content validation. These procedures for developing K-MCSE-RD established evidence for its content validity and yielded the final Korean version. In Phase II, data were collected from 391 counselors and trainees. Results of confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a bifactor structure of the K-MCSE-RD scores that are explained by general counseling skills and three dimensions of multicultural counseling self-efficacy: Multicultural Intervention, Multicultural Assessment, and Multicultural Counseling Session Management. The reliability estimates examined by Cronbach's alpha and omega coefficients showed that the K-MCSE-RD subscales and total scores provided adequate internal consistency. Next, structural equation modeling analyses confirmed the overall adequacy of the social cognitive model in predicting multicultural counseling interests and choice goals. Specifically, support of concurrent validity was also found for the social cognitive model in which person-cognitive variables (self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and interests, in the contexts of multicultural counseling) mediated the effects of prior multicultural counseling experiences and perceptions of multicultural training environments on intentions for engagement in future multicultural counseling. In conclusion, psychometric properties of the K-MCSE-RD were established by empirical evidences of three validity types (i.e., content, construct, and concurrent validity) and reliability. This study contributes the theoretical extension of social cognitive theory to the multicultural counseling domain and its application for Korean counselor samples. Practical implications for mental health practitioners and counseling educators, limitations, and directions for future research are provided.
590 $a School code: 0668.
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 517650
650 4 $a Counseling psychology. $3 924824
653 $a Confirmatory factor analysis
653 $a Korean counselors
653 $a Multicultural counseling self-efficacy
653 $a Social cognitive theory
653 $a Structural equation modeling
653 $a Validity
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0603
710 2 $a State University of New York at Albany. $b Educational Psychology and Methodology. $3 3351181
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12B.
790 $a 0668
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27962202