東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

How Daily Journalists Verify Numbers...

Van Witsen, Anthony.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How Daily Journalists Verify Numbers and Statistics in News Stories: Towards a Theory.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Daily Journalists Verify Numbers and Statistics in News Stories: Towards a Theory./
作者:	Van Witsen, Anthony.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	114 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12B.
標題:	Journalism. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27994953
ISBN:	9798641023656

How Daily Journalists Verify Numbers and Statistics in News Stories: Towards a Theory.
Van Witsen, Anthony.

How Daily Journalists Verify Numbers and Statistics in News Stories: Towards a Theory. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 114 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Statistics are widely acknowledged as an essential part of journalism. Yet despite repeated investigations showing that routine news coverage involving statistics leaves much to be desired, scholarship has failed to produce an adequate theoretical understanding of how statistics are employed in journalism. Earlier research showed many journalists think anything counted or measured and expressed in numbers represents a form of unarguable truth, which may affect whether they think statistical information should be checked or verified. This study examines the verification process in detail by combining 1) qualitative interviews with fifteen working journalists about their attitudes, decision making and work practices regarding statistics; 2) an analysis of manifest statistical content in a sample of the stories created by these subjects; 3) an item-by-item examination of the decision-making processes behind each statistic in each of the sampled stories. Based on the results, I conclude the subjects did not have a single standard for verification, but followed a range of practices from simple reliance on authority at one end to careful examination of the methods behind a quantified fact claim at the other. Theoretical reasons for this are explored.

ISBN: 9798641023656Subjects--Topical Terms:

576107
Journalism.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Environment

How Daily Journalists Verify Numbers and Statistics in News Stories: Towards a Theory.
LDR:02417nmm a2200373 4500 001 2270296
005 20200921070816.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798641023656
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27994953
035 $a AAI27994953
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Van Witsen, Anthony. $3 3547669
245 1 0 $a How Daily Journalists Verify Numbers and Statistics in News Stories: Towards a Theory.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 114 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Takahashi, Bruno.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Statistics are widely acknowledged as an essential part of journalism. Yet despite repeated investigations showing that routine news coverage involving statistics leaves much to be desired, scholarship has failed to produce an adequate theoretical understanding of how statistics are employed in journalism. Earlier research showed many journalists think anything counted or measured and expressed in numbers represents a form of unarguable truth, which may affect whether they think statistical information should be checked or verified. This study examines the verification process in detail by combining 1) qualitative interviews with fifteen working journalists about their attitudes, decision making and work practices regarding statistics; 2) an analysis of manifest statistical content in a sample of the stories created by these subjects; 3) an item-by-item examination of the decision-making processes behind each statistic in each of the sampled stories. Based on the results, I conclude the subjects did not have a single standard for verification, but followed a range of practices from simple reliance on authority at one end to careful examination of the methods behind a quantified fact claim at the other. Theoretical reasons for this are explored.
590 $a School code: 0128.
650 4 $a Journalism. $3 576107
650 4 $a Environmental science. $3 677245
650 4 $a Mass communications. $3 3422380
653 $a Environment
653 $a Journalism
653 $a Mass communication
653 $a Science
653 $a Statistics
690 $a 0391
690 $a 0768
690 $a 0708
710 2 $a Michigan State University. $b Information and Media--Doctor of Philosophy. $3 3547670
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12B.
790 $a 0128
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27994953