東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Fluency, Working Memory, and Second ...

Vallejos, Cristi.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Fluency, Working Memory, and Second Language Proficiency in Multicompetent Writers.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Fluency, Working Memory, and Second Language Proficiency in Multicompetent Writers./
作者:	Vallejos, Cristi.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	193 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-12A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27958937
ISBN:	9798645499525

Fluency, Working Memory, and Second Language Proficiency in Multicompetent Writers.
Vallejos, Cristi.

Fluency, Working Memory, and Second Language Proficiency in Multicompetent Writers. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 193 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The present study compared pausing behavior while writing in the L1 and the L2 of emergent bilinguals and investigated the role of WM and proficiency level, as well as observed the cognitive processes that occurred during these pauses using a mixed-methods approach. Learners from a 5th semester (N = 17), 7th semester (N = 16), and graduating seniors (N = 14) produced argumentative tasks in their L1 and L2 and all writing behavior was recorded using Inputlog (Leijten & Van Waes, 2013), a keystroke logging program designed specifically for writing studies. Pause frequency and length was compared within and across languages and regressions were run to test the effects of the different components of WM on pausing behavior in the L1 and L2. Proficiency level was also included for the L2. Stimulated recalls were collected for a subset of participants (N = 5) and these were coded according to Kellogg's (1996) model of writing to compare cognitive behavior.Results show that in both languages pause length increased by constituent level but that all pauses were longer in Spanish than English. The relationship of WM and pauses was different for each language, in English visual spatial WM was related to pause frequency between sentences while the updating function was related to pause length between words and pause length and frequency between sentences in Spanish. Proficiency level was found to have the most effects on pauses, with those at higher proficiency levels pausing less frequently between words and sentences and pausing for shorter periods of time. Stimulated recall comments showed that participants did engage in the cognitive processes described by Kellogg (1996) in both languages, however there were qualitative differences. Processes related to formulation were the most prevalent in both languages, but there were more behaviors related to planning in English and translation was the most frequent behavior in Spanish. Some differences were also seen by proficiency level, those with a lower proficiency level did not show evidence of monitoring in Spanish while those with a higher proficiency level did.

ISBN: 9798645499525Subjects--Topical Terms:

524476
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Fluency

Fluency, Working Memory, and Second Language Proficiency in Multicompetent Writers.
LDR:03233nmm a2200349 4500 001 2270256
005 20200921070806.5
008 220629s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798645499525
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27958937
035 $a AAI27958937
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Vallejos, Cristi. $3 3547629
245 1 0 $a Fluency, Working Memory, and Second Language Proficiency in Multicompetent Writers.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 193 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Sanz, Cristina A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Georgetown University, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The present study compared pausing behavior while writing in the L1 and the L2 of emergent bilinguals and investigated the role of WM and proficiency level, as well as observed the cognitive processes that occurred during these pauses using a mixed-methods approach. Learners from a 5th semester (N = 17), 7th semester (N = 16), and graduating seniors (N = 14) produced argumentative tasks in their L1 and L2 and all writing behavior was recorded using Inputlog (Leijten & Van Waes, 2013), a keystroke logging program designed specifically for writing studies. Pause frequency and length was compared within and across languages and regressions were run to test the effects of the different components of WM on pausing behavior in the L1 and L2. Proficiency level was also included for the L2. Stimulated recalls were collected for a subset of participants (N = 5) and these were coded according to Kellogg's (1996) model of writing to compare cognitive behavior.Results show that in both languages pause length increased by constituent level but that all pauses were longer in Spanish than English. The relationship of WM and pauses was different for each language, in English visual spatial WM was related to pause frequency between sentences while the updating function was related to pause length between words and pause length and frequency between sentences in Spanish. Proficiency level was found to have the most effects on pauses, with those at higher proficiency levels pausing less frequently between words and sentences and pausing for shorter periods of time. Stimulated recall comments showed that participants did engage in the cognitive processes described by Kellogg (1996) in both languages, however there were qualitative differences. Processes related to formulation were the most prevalent in both languages, but there were more behaviors related to planning in English and translation was the most frequent behavior in Spanish. Some differences were also seen by proficiency level, those with a lower proficiency level did not show evidence of monitoring in Spanish while those with a higher proficiency level did.
590 $a School code: 0076.
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 524476
650 4 $a Foreign language learning. $3 3436780
653 $a Fluency
653 $a L2 proficiency
653 $a L2 writing
653 $a Working memory
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0444
710 2 $a Georgetown University. $b Spanish & Portuguese. $3 1037986
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-12A.
790 $a 0076
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27958937