東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Establishing Consensus Core Criteria...

Ritchie, Myles.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Establishing Consensus Core Criteria for the Protection of Heritage Trees.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Establishing Consensus Core Criteria for the Protection of Heritage Trees./
作者:	Ritchie, Myles.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	90 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-09.
標題:	Geography. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27548572
ISBN:	9781658400817

Establishing Consensus Core Criteria for the Protection of Heritage Trees.
Ritchie, Myles.

Establishing Consensus Core Criteria for the Protection of Heritage Trees. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 90 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Heritage trees are valued based on the important historical, cultural, size and other components that these specimens represent. These trees have been identified around the world and are often legally protected to ensure these aspects are conserved. However, there lacks a standardized set of expert verified criteria that can be applied to any of these programs regardless of geographic location. An initial set of 40 criteria were derived from an analysis of 46 case studies and presented to a panel of heritage tree experts to obtain consensus on the core criteria that should be used by any heritage tree program. A three iteration Delphi method was used to evaluate the aforementioned criteria and allowed additional content to be generated by the panel. The result saw 50 criteria analyzed to produce a set of 16 consensus core criteria that should be used by these programs and an additional 29 situational criteria that can apply on a case-by-case basis. Best practices found in the literature were also evaluated by the panel to serve as complementary aspects when implementing a heritage tree program. This study identified the existence of 16 common values shared among these tree programs and serves as an initial template that should be used by current and proposed heritage tree programs to select ideal candidates. Through this standardized evaluation system, the current patchwork of heritage tree programs now has the potential to become a unified network that should lead to the increased awareness and protection of these trees and the many benefits that they provide.

ISBN: 9781658400817Subjects--Topical Terms:

524010
Geography.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Exceptional trees

Establishing Consensus Core Criteria for the Protection of Heritage Trees.
LDR:02759nmm a2200385 4500 001 2268588
005 20200824072337.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781658400817
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27548572
035 $a AAI27548572
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Ritchie, Myles. $3 3545877
245 1 0 $a Establishing Consensus Core Criteria for the Protection of Heritage Trees.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 90 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-09.
500 $a Advisor: Szuster, Brian.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Heritage trees are valued based on the important historical, cultural, size and other components that these specimens represent. These trees have been identified around the world and are often legally protected to ensure these aspects are conserved. However, there lacks a standardized set of expert verified criteria that can be applied to any of these programs regardless of geographic location. An initial set of 40 criteria were derived from an analysis of 46 case studies and presented to a panel of heritage tree experts to obtain consensus on the core criteria that should be used by any heritage tree program. A three iteration Delphi method was used to evaluate the aforementioned criteria and allowed additional content to be generated by the panel. The result saw 50 criteria analyzed to produce a set of 16 consensus core criteria that should be used by these programs and an additional 29 situational criteria that can apply on a case-by-case basis. Best practices found in the literature were also evaluated by the panel to serve as complementary aspects when implementing a heritage tree program. This study identified the existence of 16 common values shared among these tree programs and serves as an initial template that should be used by current and proposed heritage tree programs to select ideal candidates. Through this standardized evaluation system, the current patchwork of heritage tree programs now has the potential to become a unified network that should lead to the increased awareness and protection of these trees and the many benefits that they provide.
590 $a School code: 0085.
650 4 $a Geography. $3 524010
650 4 $a Natural resource management. $3 589570
650 4 $a Environmental management. $3 535182
653 $a Exceptional trees
653 $a Heritage trees
653 $a Monumental trees
653 $a Significant trees
653 $a Tree conservation
653 $a Urban forestry
690 $a 0366
690 $a 0528
690 $a 0474
710 2 $a University of Hawai'i at Manoa. $b Geography. $3 2119465
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-09.
790 $a 0085
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27548572