東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Japanese Nationalism: A Transnationa...

Chambers, Travis.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Japanese Nationalism: A Transnational Case Study of Pan-Asianism in China and Vietnam 1931-1945.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Japanese Nationalism: A Transnational Case Study of Pan-Asianism in China and Vietnam 1931-1945./
作者:	Chambers, Travis.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	106 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-03.
標題:	Asian history. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22587691
ISBN:	9781085648042

Japanese Nationalism: A Transnational Case Study of Pan-Asianism in China and Vietnam 1931-1945.
Chambers, Travis.

Japanese Nationalism: A Transnational Case Study of Pan-Asianism in China and Vietnam 1931-1945. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 106 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Central Oklahoma, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

After Japan pragmatized bushido and formed a modernized nation-state in the late nineteenth century, it extended that same methodology to its East Asian neighbors, China and Vietnam. Despite state-sponsored bushido's success at home and cultural similarities with Asian peoples abroad, Japanese nation-state building failed in China and Vietnam. Was Pan-Asianism fully implemented as designed by Japanese architects? What were the repercussions of Pan-Asianism on nationalist movements in East Asia? Previous scholarship addressed these questions unfairly and critiqued Chinese and Vietnamese nationalists, who accepted Japanese aid, as "collaborators" or "traitors." Additionally, historiography abruptly demarked Pan-Asianism's demise at Japan's surrender in 1945. Japanese nationalism and state-building succeeded in Japan but when applied transnationally from 1931-1945 and despite social, linguistic, and cultural similarities, Pan-Asianism failed in China and Vietnam due to differing historical experiences.This is an intellectual history that comparatively analyzes rhetorical, cultural, political, educational, economic, and military exchange between Japan, China, and Vietnam. Furthermore, it is a new interpretation of Pan-Asian exchange during World War Two that utilizes a transnational lens. It relies on primary sources from Japan, China, Vietnam, Great Britain, France, the United States, and numerous other countries involved from 1931-1945. The author does not simply employ sources from various countries but explains scholarly interchange and the formation of national narratives within East Asia. Moreover, the author references secondary sources from previous scholarship to establish a background and contribute a more rounded historical narrative.The author illustrates that despite cultural, linguistic, and social similarities between Japan, China, and Vietnam, Pan-Asianism was not effectively transplanted due to differing historical circumstances. The Japanese nation formed as a military culture and remained isolated from the seventeenth to nineteenth century. Japanese national-formation was juxtaposed to that of China and Vietnam, both of which were subjected to external incursions, consisted of various ethnic groups, and had different dialects. Despite Japan's failure in implementing Pan-Asianism directly, aspects of it survived World War Two into the Cold War in the form of post-colonial, nationalist movements in East Asia. This significantly contributes to historiography as a new, comparative study and intellectual history through a transnational lens.

ISBN: 9781085648042Subjects--Topical Terms:

1099323
Asian history.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Chinese nationalism

Japanese Nationalism: A Transnational Case Study of Pan-Asianism in China and Vietnam 1931-1945.
LDR:03923nmm a2200433 4500 001 2267427
005 20200707094515.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781085648042
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22587691
035 $a AAI22587691
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Chambers, Travis. $3 3544676
245 1 0 $a Japanese Nationalism: A Transnational Case Study of Pan-Asianism in China and Vietnam 1931-1945.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 106 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-03.
500 $a Includes supplementary digital materials.
500 $a Advisor: Li, Xiaobing.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Central Oklahoma, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a After Japan pragmatized bushido and formed a modernized nation-state in the late nineteenth century, it extended that same methodology to its East Asian neighbors, China and Vietnam. Despite state-sponsored bushido's success at home and cultural similarities with Asian peoples abroad, Japanese nation-state building failed in China and Vietnam. Was Pan-Asianism fully implemented as designed by Japanese architects? What were the repercussions of Pan-Asianism on nationalist movements in East Asia? Previous scholarship addressed these questions unfairly and critiqued Chinese and Vietnamese nationalists, who accepted Japanese aid, as "collaborators" or "traitors." Additionally, historiography abruptly demarked Pan-Asianism's demise at Japan's surrender in 1945. Japanese nationalism and state-building succeeded in Japan but when applied transnationally from 1931-1945 and despite social, linguistic, and cultural similarities, Pan-Asianism failed in China and Vietnam due to differing historical experiences.This is an intellectual history that comparatively analyzes rhetorical, cultural, political, educational, economic, and military exchange between Japan, China, and Vietnam. Furthermore, it is a new interpretation of Pan-Asian exchange during World War Two that utilizes a transnational lens. It relies on primary sources from Japan, China, Vietnam, Great Britain, France, the United States, and numerous other countries involved from 1931-1945. The author does not simply employ sources from various countries but explains scholarly interchange and the formation of national narratives within East Asia. Moreover, the author references secondary sources from previous scholarship to establish a background and contribute a more rounded historical narrative.The author illustrates that despite cultural, linguistic, and social similarities between Japan, China, and Vietnam, Pan-Asianism was not effectively transplanted due to differing historical circumstances. The Japanese nation formed as a military culture and remained isolated from the seventeenth to nineteenth century. Japanese national-formation was juxtaposed to that of China and Vietnam, both of which were subjected to external incursions, consisted of various ethnic groups, and had different dialects. Despite Japan's failure in implementing Pan-Asianism directly, aspects of it survived World War Two into the Cold War in the form of post-colonial, nationalist movements in East Asia. This significantly contributes to historiography as a new, comparative study and intellectual history through a transnational lens.
590 $a School code: 0503.
650 4 $a Asian history. $2 bicssc $3 1099323
650 4 $a Asian studies. $3 1571829
650 4 $a Southeast Asian studies. $3 3344898
653 $a Chinese nationalism
653 $a Japanese nationalism
653 $a Pan-Asianism
653 $a Post-colonial
653 $a Transnationalism
653 $a Vietnamese nationalism
653 $a China
653 $a Vietnam
653 $a Japan
690 $a 0332
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0222
710 2 $a University of Central Oklahoma. $b History & Geography. $3 1017638
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-03.
790 $a 0503
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22587691