東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Towards an Empirical Classification ...

Palmer, Kira M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Towards an Empirical Classification of Dysarthria Severity.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Towards an Empirical Classification of Dysarthria Severity./
作者:	Palmer, Kira M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	35 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-05.
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22618989
ISBN:	9781088390702

Towards an Empirical Classification of Dysarthria Severity.
Palmer, Kira M.

Towards an Empirical Classification of Dysarthria Severity. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 35 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--MGH Institute of Health Professions, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Purpose: This study explored the classification of dysarthria severity through quantitative methods in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).Methods: Ten speech-language pathologists (SLPs) listened to speech samples from individuals with ALS and healthy controls. They orthographically transcribed the sentences, rated speech severity (i.e. normal, mild, moderate, severe and profound) and rated listening effort and tiredness. Speaking rate and intelligible words per minute (IWPM) were also calculated. Correlations were computed between all variables to explore validity of the clinician-based severity ratings. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) testing with post-hoc contrasts were completed to determine which measure was the best for defining severity categories and how many severity categories were needed to capture clinician perception of dysarthria severity. Pearson product correlation coefficients were also completed to explore inter- and intra-rater reliability.Results: Post-hoc analyses revealed significant differences between all five severity categories (normal, mild, moderate, severe, profound) when IWPM was used as a calculated metric of the dysarthric speech samples, along with confirmed high (p > 0.9) inter- and intra-rater reliabilities for severity rating and transcription intelligibility scores.Conclusions: IWPM was identified as the best quantitative method for defining dysarthria severity categories. Five severity categories were found to be necessary to capture SLP ratings of dysarthria severity accurately. Clinician-based severity ratings were found to be reliable and valid. The preliminary results establish a foundation for further research of evidence-based practice patterns in motor speech disorders.

ISBN: 9781088390702Subjects--Topical Terms:

520446
Speech therapy.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Adults

Towards an Empirical Classification of Dysarthria Severity.
LDR:02808nmm a2200349 4500 001 2266637
005 20200612095543.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781088390702
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22618989
035 $a AAI22618989
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Palmer, Kira M. $3 3543849
245 1 0 $a Towards an Empirical Classification of Dysarthria Severity.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 35 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.
500 $a Advisor: Green, Jordan R.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--MGH Institute of Health Professions, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Purpose: This study explored the classification of dysarthria severity through quantitative methods in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).Methods: Ten speech-language pathologists (SLPs) listened to speech samples from individuals with ALS and healthy controls. They orthographically transcribed the sentences, rated speech severity (i.e. normal, mild, moderate, severe and profound) and rated listening effort and tiredness. Speaking rate and intelligible words per minute (IWPM) were also calculated. Correlations were computed between all variables to explore validity of the clinician-based severity ratings. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) testing with post-hoc contrasts were completed to determine which measure was the best for defining severity categories and how many severity categories were needed to capture clinician perception of dysarthria severity. Pearson product correlation coefficients were also completed to explore inter- and intra-rater reliability.Results: Post-hoc analyses revealed significant differences between all five severity categories (normal, mild, moderate, severe, profound) when IWPM was used as a calculated metric of the dysarthric speech samples, along with confirmed high (p > 0.9) inter- and intra-rater reliabilities for severity rating and transcription intelligibility scores.Conclusions: IWPM was identified as the best quantitative method for defining dysarthria severity categories. Five severity categories were found to be necessary to capture SLP ratings of dysarthria severity accurately. Clinician-based severity ratings were found to be reliable and valid. The preliminary results establish a foundation for further research of evidence-based practice patterns in motor speech disorders.
590 $a School code: 0895.
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 520446
653 $a Adults
653 $a ALS
653 $a Clinical practice
653 $a Dysarthria
653 $a Severity
690 $a 0460
710 2 $a MGH Institute of Health Professions. $b Communications, Sciences and Disorders. $3 3280935
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-05.
790 $a 0895
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22618989