語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Which of Stock Returns or Dividend G...
~
Park, Miae.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Which of Stock Returns or Dividend Growth is Predictable? A Defense of Stock Return Predictability.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Which of Stock Returns or Dividend Growth is Predictable? A Defense of Stock Return Predictability./
作者:
Park, Miae.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:
35 p.
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International80-08.
標題:
Economics. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=11017249
Which of Stock Returns or Dividend Growth is Predictable? A Defense of Stock Return Predictability.
Park, Miae.
Which of Stock Returns or Dividend Growth is Predictable? A Defense of Stock Return Predictability.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 35 p.
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08.
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Southern California, 2018.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
With CRSP return index widely used to compute the dividend-price ratio in the finance literature, the lack of dividend growth predictability has been considered as stronger evidence than does the presence of return predictability-"the dog that did not bark: a defense of return predictability", Cochrane (2008). However, CRSP's completion of Pre62 Daily Data Series Project made small changes in their historical returns especially before 1947s and a substantial difference in their implied dividends is generated, which dramatically change the ability of the dividend-price ratio to forecast dividend growth-now it forecasts both future return and future dividend growth. In this paper, I comprehensively re-evaluate the empirical evidence of predictability of stock returns and dividend growth splitting the sample period pre- and pro-1947 and adopting the two additional market returns: return from Robert J. Shiller online website and return constructed with independently measured NIPA dividends. This paper shows that (1) depends on the time periods (especially pre-1947s) and data resources taken from, predictability dividend growth is present. (2) all of the long-horizon return regressions give greater statistical evidence for return predictability. In addition, the same variables that produce dividend growth predictability steadily show the identical patterns of return predictability at long horizons, is stronger evidence of return predictability.Subjects--Topical Terms:
517137
Economics.
Which of Stock Returns or Dividend Growth is Predictable? A Defense of Stock Return Predictability.
LDR
:02487nmm a2200301 4500
001
2266213
005
20200608092708.5
008
220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI11017249
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)US_Calif_502531
035
$a
AAI11017249
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Park, Miae.
$3
3543396
245
1 0
$a
Which of Stock Returns or Dividend Growth is Predictable? A Defense of Stock Return Predictability.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2018
300
$a
35 p.
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-08.
500
$a
Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500
$a
Advisor: Kocer, Yilmaz.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Southern California, 2018.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
With CRSP return index widely used to compute the dividend-price ratio in the finance literature, the lack of dividend growth predictability has been considered as stronger evidence than does the presence of return predictability-"the dog that did not bark: a defense of return predictability", Cochrane (2008). However, CRSP's completion of Pre62 Daily Data Series Project made small changes in their historical returns especially before 1947s and a substantial difference in their implied dividends is generated, which dramatically change the ability of the dividend-price ratio to forecast dividend growth-now it forecasts both future return and future dividend growth. In this paper, I comprehensively re-evaluate the empirical evidence of predictability of stock returns and dividend growth splitting the sample period pre- and pro-1947 and adopting the two additional market returns: return from Robert J. Shiller online website and return constructed with independently measured NIPA dividends. This paper shows that (1) depends on the time periods (especially pre-1947s) and data resources taken from, predictability dividend growth is present. (2) all of the long-horizon return regressions give greater statistical evidence for return predictability. In addition, the same variables that produce dividend growth predictability steadily show the identical patterns of return predictability at long horizons, is stronger evidence of return predictability.
590
$a
School code: 0208.
650
4
$a
Economics.
$3
517137
690
$a
0501
710
2
$a
University of Southern California.
$3
700129
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
80-08.
790
$a
0208
791
$a
M.A.
792
$a
2018
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=11017249
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9418447
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入