東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Comparative Analysis of Pay for Pe...

Soria, Henry .

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Comparative Analysis of Pay for Performance and GS Pay Systems, Motivation, and Employee Retention in Federal Government.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Comparative Analysis of Pay for Performance and GS Pay Systems, Motivation, and Employee Retention in Federal Government./
作者:	Soria, Henry .
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	303 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International81-05A.
標題:	Public administration. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27544641
ISBN:	9781392849354

A Comparative Analysis of Pay for Performance and GS Pay Systems, Motivation, and Employee Retention in Federal Government.
Soria, Henry .

A Comparative Analysis of Pay for Performance and GS Pay Systems, Motivation, and Employee Retention in Federal Government. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 303 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.

Thesis (D.P.A.)--University of La Verne, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the pay-for-performance (PFP) pay system utilized by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in comparison to a similar agency that utilizes the General Schedule (GS) pay system, Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This research investigated the effect of each pay system, through examination of employee demographic characteristics, workplace satisfaction, and organizational relationship factors, to measure the pay systems' influence on employee satisfaction, performance, and turnover intention.Theoretical Framework. The theoretical framework of this study was based on the research foundations of the following theories: Herzberg's hygiene 2-factor theory; expectancy theory; equity theory; principal-agent theory, and public service motivation as a lens to assess and understand the effects of the philosophies of PFP and GS pay systems on employees' motivations.Methodology. The subjects in this study were employees of the federal government agencies: TSA and CBP. Subjects responded to surveys administered in the form of the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Surveys (FEVS) to code statistical data and quantify the identified variables under each pay system.Findings. Examination of quantitative data from the two FEVS data sets for each federal agency indicated that the GS system was more likely to successfully address the conflict between turnover and retaining a dedicated workforce, whereas PFP indicated higher turnover intention. Secondly, examinations of the same variables between the two data sets showed that the GS pay system was less likely to address the conflict between performance and employee satisfaction.Conclusions and Recommendations. The results of this study support that employees' perceptions of performance and employee satisfaction are influenced in agencies with PFP systems, focusing on extrinsic values (i.e., money) than in GS agencies focusing on intrinsic values (i.e., organizational goals, mission attachment). Further research is advised: Analyze similar variables for previous year's FEVS and compare results between the pay systems to identify trends. Identify differences among supervisory and nonsupervisory employees (education, production); determine which are more inclined to leave their organization. Compare other agencies that utilize the PFP system to determine if similar responses occur.

ISBN: 9781392849354Subjects--Topical Terms:

531287
Public administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Employee satisfaction

A Comparative Analysis of Pay for Performance and GS Pay Systems, Motivation, and Employee Retention in Federal Government.
LDR:03669nmm a2200385 4500 001 2265843
005 20200526090900.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392849354
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27544641
035 $a AAI27544641
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Soria, Henry . $3 3543022
245 1 0 $a A Comparative Analysis of Pay for Performance and GS Pay Systems, Motivation, and Employee Retention in Federal Government.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 303 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Meek, Jack.
502 $a Thesis (D.P.A.)--University of La Verne, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Purpose. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the pay-for-performance (PFP) pay system utilized by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in comparison to a similar agency that utilizes the General Schedule (GS) pay system, Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This research investigated the effect of each pay system, through examination of employee demographic characteristics, workplace satisfaction, and organizational relationship factors, to measure the pay systems' influence on employee satisfaction, performance, and turnover intention.Theoretical Framework. The theoretical framework of this study was based on the research foundations of the following theories: Herzberg's hygiene 2-factor theory; expectancy theory; equity theory; principal-agent theory, and public service motivation as a lens to assess and understand the effects of the philosophies of PFP and GS pay systems on employees' motivations.Methodology. The subjects in this study were employees of the federal government agencies: TSA and CBP. Subjects responded to surveys administered in the form of the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Surveys (FEVS) to code statistical data and quantify the identified variables under each pay system.Findings. Examination of quantitative data from the two FEVS data sets for each federal agency indicated that the GS system was more likely to successfully address the conflict between turnover and retaining a dedicated workforce, whereas PFP indicated higher turnover intention. Secondly, examinations of the same variables between the two data sets showed that the GS pay system was less likely to address the conflict between performance and employee satisfaction.Conclusions and Recommendations. The results of this study support that employees' perceptions of performance and employee satisfaction are influenced in agencies with PFP systems, focusing on extrinsic values (i.e., money) than in GS agencies focusing on intrinsic values (i.e., organizational goals, mission attachment). Further research is advised: Analyze similar variables for previous year's FEVS and compare results between the pay systems to identify trends. Identify differences among supervisory and nonsupervisory employees (education, production); determine which are more inclined to leave their organization. Compare other agencies that utilize the PFP system to determine if similar responses occur.
590 $a School code: 0476.
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 531287
650 4 $a Organization theory. $3 2122787
650 4 $a Organizational behavior. $3 516683
653 $a Employee satisfaction
653 $a Federal government
653 $a Organizational behavior
653 $a Pay systems
653 $a Performance
653 $a Turnover intention
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0635
690 $a 0703
710 2 $a University of La Verne. $b College of Business and Public Management. $3 3276629
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 81-05A.
790 $a 0476
791 $a D.P.A.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27544641