東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Recreation Visits to Lake Mead and G...

Wu, Xiaoting .

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Recreation Visits to Lake Mead and Glen Canyon National Recreation Areas: A Replication Study.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Recreation Visits to Lake Mead and Glen Canyon National Recreation Areas: A Replication Study./
作者:	Wu, Xiaoting .
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	40 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International81-05.
標題:	Environmental economics. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22620157
ISBN:	9781687905086

Recreation Visits to Lake Mead and Glen Canyon National Recreation Areas: A Replication Study.
Wu, Xiaoting .

Recreation Visits to Lake Mead and Glen Canyon National Recreation Areas: A Replication Study. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 40 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.

Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Arizona, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This thesis conducted a replication study of an earlier analysis of the relationship between lake volumes and monthly recreation visits to Lake Mead and Glen Canyon (Lake Powell) National Recreation Areas. The exact same data that were used in the original study were no longer available, but similar data were available from the same government agency sources used in the original study. For the years of the original study, 1996 to 2011, the basic results of the original study hold in the replication. These were that (i) lake volume was significantly and positively associated with visits, (ii) the effect of volume had different seasonal effects for Lake Powell, but not Lake Mead, and (iii) there were strong monthly seasonality in visitation patterns. The main results of the original study - the strong positive impact of lake volume on visits - was not robust when extending the period of analysis from 1979 to 2017. When additional economic variables were added to the regression model, a positive effect of lake volume was found for Lake Powell from 1996-2017, but not from 1979-2017, or 1979-1995. A significant positive relationship between volume and visits was not found for Lake Mead for 1979-1995, 1996-2017, or the entire period 1979-2017. Throughout out all regression specifications, gasoline price, which was omitted from the previous study, had a statistically significant negative effect on visits. This effect was robust across all time intervals and across both lakes.

ISBN: 9781687905086Subjects--Topical Terms:

535179
Environmental economics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Lake volumes

Recreation Visits to Lake Mead and Glen Canyon National Recreation Areas: A Replication Study.
LDR:02770nmm a2200421 4500 001 2265654
005 20200528062537.5
008 220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781687905086
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI22620157
035 $a AAI22620157
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Wu, Xiaoting . $3 3542826
245 1 0 $a Recreation Visits to Lake Mead and Glen Canyon National Recreation Areas: A Replication Study.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 40 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 81-05.
500 $a Advisor: Frisvold, George.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--The University of Arizona, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This thesis conducted a replication study of an earlier analysis of the relationship between lake volumes and monthly recreation visits to Lake Mead and Glen Canyon (Lake Powell) National Recreation Areas. The exact same data that were used in the original study were no longer available, but similar data were available from the same government agency sources used in the original study. For the years of the original study, 1996 to 2011, the basic results of the original study hold in the replication. These were that (i) lake volume was significantly and positively associated with visits, (ii) the effect of volume had different seasonal effects for Lake Powell, but not Lake Mead, and (iii) there were strong monthly seasonality in visitation patterns. The main results of the original study - the strong positive impact of lake volume on visits - was not robust when extending the period of analysis from 1979 to 2017. When additional economic variables were added to the regression model, a positive effect of lake volume was found for Lake Powell from 1996-2017, but not from 1979-2017, or 1979-1995. A significant positive relationship between volume and visits was not found for Lake Mead for 1979-1995, 1996-2017, or the entire period 1979-2017. Throughout out all regression specifications, gasoline price, which was omitted from the previous study, had a statistically significant negative effect on visits. This effect was robust across all time intervals and across both lakes.
590 $a School code: 0009.
650 4 $a Environmental economics. $3 535179
650 4 $a Environmental management. $3 535182
650 4 $a Recreation. $3 535376
650 4 $a Economics. $3 517137
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 2122788
653 $a Lake volumes
653 $a Monthly recreation visits
653 $a Lake Mead
653 $a Glen Canyon
653 $a Lake Powell
653 $a Seasonality in visitation patterns
653 $a Gasoline price
690 $a 0438
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0814
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Agricultural & Resource Economics. $3 3349251
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 81-05.
790 $a 0009
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=22620157