東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Metacognitive Prompts: A Reading App...

Boschert, Barbara N.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Metacognitive Prompts: A Reading Apprenticeship Strategy to Improve Metacognition and Reading Comprehension of At-Risk Community College Students in a Reading-Based Class.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Metacognitive Prompts: A Reading Apprenticeship Strategy to Improve Metacognition and Reading Comprehension of At-Risk Community College Students in a Reading-Based Class./
作者:	Boschert, Barbara N.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	161 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International79-11A.
標題:	Community college education. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10831626
ISBN:	9780355885057

Metacognitive Prompts: A Reading Apprenticeship Strategy to Improve Metacognition and Reading Comprehension of At-Risk Community College Students in a Reading-Based Class.
Boschert, Barbara N.

Metacognitive Prompts: A Reading Apprenticeship Strategy to Improve Metacognition and Reading Comprehension of At-Risk Community College Students in a Reading-Based Class. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 161 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--Delta State University, 2018.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

At-risk students arrive on community college campuses lacking the proper preparedness to cope with the complexity of assigned reading. This study investigated whether using metacognitive prompts could improve both the metacognition and reading comprehension of at-risk community college students in a Western Civilization I class. The use of metacognitive prompts was adapted from Reading Apprenticeship a metacognitive approach to improve reading comprehension (Schoenbach, Greenleaf, Cziko, & Hurwitz, 1999). Metacognition or "thinking about thinking," is a widely studied learning theory that falls under the umbrella of constructivism. Numerous studies suggest a relationship between metacognitive knowledge and skill and academic success. The semester-long intervention focused on using metacognitive prompts during reading and metacognitive conversation following reading. A convenience sample of 75 participants completed two pretest posttest measurements: a researcher-designed test of metacognition that asked participants to annotate their mental processes by making predictions, asking questions, making connections, visualizing, and summarizing their thinking as they read and an ACT Compass Sample Reading Test to measure reading comprehension. The majority of the sample were considered academically at risk due to ACT scores of 18 and below and receipt of a Pell Grant. A paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant increase from the metacognitive pretest (M= 5.67, SD = 1.85) to the posttest (M= 6.89, SD = 1.89), t(74) = -5.1, p < .001. Similarly, a paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant increase from the reading comprehension pretest (M = 11.09, SD = 2.43) to the posttest (M= 12.53, SD = 2.72), t(74) = -4.02,p < .001. Split file paired samples t-tests examined the means of the demographic variables and several groups showed statistically significant increases on both measures. Participants receiving Pell Grants and with ACT scores below the college readiness benchmark showed statistically significant increases in metacognition and reading comprehension. The statistically significant results offered strongly suggestive evidence that the reading intervention, using metacognitive prompts while reading, was effective in improving the metacognitive awareness and the reading comprehension of at-risk community college students. Metacognitive instruction should be brought into the community college classroom to improve student academic performance.

ISBN: 9780355885057Subjects--Topical Terms:

2122836
Community college education.

Metacognitive Prompts: A Reading Apprenticeship Strategy to Improve Metacognition and Reading Comprehension of At-Risk Community College Students in a Reading-Based Class.
LDR:03730nmm a2200325 4500 001 2264829
005 20200515113418.5
008 220629s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780355885057
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10831626
035 $a AAI10831626
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Boschert, Barbara N. $3 3541961
245 1 0 $a Metacognitive Prompts: A Reading Apprenticeship Strategy to Improve Metacognition and Reading Comprehension of At-Risk Community College Students in a Reading-Based Class.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 161 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 79-11, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Zengaro, Sally A.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--Delta State University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a At-risk students arrive on community college campuses lacking the proper preparedness to cope with the complexity of assigned reading. This study investigated whether using metacognitive prompts could improve both the metacognition and reading comprehension of at-risk community college students in a Western Civilization I class. The use of metacognitive prompts was adapted from Reading Apprenticeship a metacognitive approach to improve reading comprehension (Schoenbach, Greenleaf, Cziko, & Hurwitz, 1999). Metacognition or "thinking about thinking," is a widely studied learning theory that falls under the umbrella of constructivism. Numerous studies suggest a relationship between metacognitive knowledge and skill and academic success. The semester-long intervention focused on using metacognitive prompts during reading and metacognitive conversation following reading. A convenience sample of 75 participants completed two pretest posttest measurements: a researcher-designed test of metacognition that asked participants to annotate their mental processes by making predictions, asking questions, making connections, visualizing, and summarizing their thinking as they read and an ACT Compass Sample Reading Test to measure reading comprehension. The majority of the sample were considered academically at risk due to ACT scores of 18 and below and receipt of a Pell Grant. A paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant increase from the metacognitive pretest (M= 5.67, SD = 1.85) to the posttest (M= 6.89, SD = 1.89), t(74) = -5.1, p < .001. Similarly, a paired samples t-test indicated a statistically significant increase from the reading comprehension pretest (M = 11.09, SD = 2.43) to the posttest (M= 12.53, SD = 2.72), t(74) = -4.02,p < .001. Split file paired samples t-tests examined the means of the demographic variables and several groups showed statistically significant increases on both measures. Participants receiving Pell Grants and with ACT scores below the college readiness benchmark showed statistically significant increases in metacognition and reading comprehension. The statistically significant results offered strongly suggestive evidence that the reading intervention, using metacognitive prompts while reading, was effective in improving the metacognitive awareness and the reading comprehension of at-risk community college students. Metacognitive instruction should be brought into the community college classroom to improve student academic performance.
590 $a School code: 0877.
650 4 $a Community college education. $3 2122836
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 2122756
690 $a 0275
690 $a 0535
710 2 $a Delta State University. $3 1023824
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 79-11A.
790 $a 0877
791 $a Ed.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10831626