東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

The Role of International Organizati...

Gallaher, Keaton Ann.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

The Role of International Organizations in the Negotiations of Multilateral Treaties.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Role of International Organizations in the Negotiations of Multilateral Treaties./
作者:	Gallaher, Keaton Ann.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	89 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International80-06.
標題:	Peace Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13420371
ISBN:	9780438726086

The Role of International Organizations in the Negotiations of Multilateral Treaties.
Gallaher, Keaton Ann.

The Role of International Organizations in the Negotiations of Multilateral Treaties. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 89 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06.

Thesis (M.A.)--Webster University, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The main objective of this research is to look at how States view the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the negotiations of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action). The reason this role is so crucial to understand, is to see if international Organizations (IOs) can further peace and stability in the world. The data that is used is the extra-budgetary contributions from States and the statements given during the General Conference. The other data looked at is the communications summited to the IAEA for distribution by States. The data is then run through three models derived from the theories of realism, liberalism, and the garbage can theory. Model one derived from the realist perspective says that the IAEA is just an instrument of the major powers. Model two derived from the liberal perspective assumes that the IAEA plays an autonomous role in agenda setting and rulemaking. Model three derived from the garbage can theory says that the IAEA is organized anarchy. The results from the findings are that the P5+1 who accuse Iran of breaking international rules assume that the role of the IAEA is an autonomous actor except for the United Kingdom. Iran who is being accused of violating international rules sees the role of the IAEA as a tool of the State and that also changes based on their own needs. A factor for this is that Iran and the West have ideological differences and a historical past which is full of mistrust and failed long-term understandings of international rules of non-proliferation.

ISBN: 9780438726086Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669515
Peace Studies.

The Role of International Organizations in the Negotiations of Multilateral Treaties.
LDR:02591nmm a2200325 4500 001 2264645
005 20200511121247.5
008 220629s2018 eng d
020 $a 9780438726086
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13420371
035 $a (MiAaPQ)webster:10236
035 $a AAI13420371
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Gallaher, Keaton Ann. $3 3541769
245 1 4 $a The Role of International Organizations in the Negotiations of Multilateral Treaties.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 89 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Batora, Jozef.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--Webster University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The main objective of this research is to look at how States view the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in the negotiations of the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action). The reason this role is so crucial to understand, is to see if international Organizations (IOs) can further peace and stability in the world. The data that is used is the extra-budgetary contributions from States and the statements given during the General Conference. The other data looked at is the communications summited to the IAEA for distribution by States. The data is then run through three models derived from the theories of realism, liberalism, and the garbage can theory. Model one derived from the realist perspective says that the IAEA is just an instrument of the major powers. Model two derived from the liberal perspective assumes that the IAEA plays an autonomous role in agenda setting and rulemaking. Model three derived from the garbage can theory says that the IAEA is organized anarchy. The results from the findings are that the P5+1 who accuse Iran of breaking international rules assume that the role of the IAEA is an autonomous actor except for the United Kingdom. Iran who is being accused of violating international rules sees the role of the IAEA as a tool of the State and that also changes based on their own needs. A factor for this is that Iran and the West have ideological differences and a historical past which is full of mistrust and failed long-term understandings of international rules of non-proliferation.
590 $a School code: 0813.
650 4 $a Peace Studies. $3 1669515
650 4 $a International Relations. $3 895651
690 $a 0563
690 $a 0601
710 2 $a Webster University. $b History, Politics and International Relations. $3 3428834
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 80-06.
790 $a 0813
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13420371