東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

China's International Socialization?...

Shanks, Spencer A.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

China's International Socialization? A Case Study of the Definition of Terrorism.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	China's International Socialization? A Case Study of the Definition of Terrorism./
作者:	Shanks, Spencer A.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	80 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International80-04.
標題:	Asian Studies. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10828143
ISBN:	9780438393592

China's International Socialization? A Case Study of the Definition of Terrorism.
Shanks, Spencer A.

China's International Socialization? A Case Study of the Definition of Terrorism. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 80 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2018.

This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.

In 2015, China procured a formal and statutory legal definition of terrorism for the first time. Where does the definition stand in comparison to prior Chinese state conceptions? How does the definition compare to other states internationally? The standard model of comparison between states lacks cohesion-academics war over the basic definition of terrorism (or simply invent one) to cover-up a gap in the literature of Terrorism Studies. The weakness is mirrored on a global scale, where no consensus-level definition of terrorism has been reached. Often, the focus is on actor/action senses of the phenomena, and not a legalistic definition. Despite the lack of consensus regarding terrorism, I will evaluate the general definitions in international organizations, conventions, regional agreements, and individual countries, and compare these to China's definitions. Centers of socialization, chiefly supra-national organizations such as the United Nations, international organizations, treaties, etc. are often forums of exchange and deposit for accountability between States and defining terrorism-these organs are my data source. I do not evaluate, however, the outcomes of how states and organizations define terrorism, focusing exclusively on the definitions themselves. Through this analysis, I hope to reach several conclusions: 1) identify trends in definitional composition between and among States; 2) identify China's own path of definitional evolution; 3) compare China's evolution internationally to gain insight into either China's definitional socialization or resilience to potential international norms.

ISBN: 9780438393592Subjects--Topical Terms:

1669375
Asian Studies.

China's International Socialization? A Case Study of the Definition of Terrorism.
LDR:02763nmm a2200349 4500 001 2264625
005 20200511121244.5
008 220629s2018 eng d
020 $a 9780438393592
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10828143
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ku:16048
035 $a AAI10828143
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Shanks, Spencer A. $3 3541748
245 1 0 $a China's International Socialization? A Case Study of the Definition of Terrorism.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 80 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-04.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Kennedy, John J.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.)--University of Kansas, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a In 2015, China procured a formal and statutory legal definition of terrorism for the first time. Where does the definition stand in comparison to prior Chinese state conceptions? How does the definition compare to other states internationally? The standard model of comparison between states lacks cohesion-academics war over the basic definition of terrorism (or simply invent one) to cover-up a gap in the literature of Terrorism Studies. The weakness is mirrored on a global scale, where no consensus-level definition of terrorism has been reached. Often, the focus is on actor/action senses of the phenomena, and not a legalistic definition. Despite the lack of consensus regarding terrorism, I will evaluate the general definitions in international organizations, conventions, regional agreements, and individual countries, and compare these to China's definitions. Centers of socialization, chiefly supra-national organizations such as the United Nations, international organizations, treaties, etc. are often forums of exchange and deposit for accountability between States and defining terrorism-these organs are my data source. I do not evaluate, however, the outcomes of how states and organizations define terrorism, focusing exclusively on the definitions themselves. Through this analysis, I hope to reach several conclusions: 1) identify trends in definitional composition between and among States; 2) identify China's own path of definitional evolution; 3) compare China's evolution internationally to gain insight into either China's definitional socialization or resilience to potential international norms.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Asian Studies. $3 1669375
650 4 $a International Relations. $3 895651
650 4 $a Political science. $3 528916
690 $a 0342
690 $a 0601
690 $a 0615
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Global and International Studies. $3 2095286
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 80-04.
790 $a 0099
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10828143