語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Depolarizing Environmental Policy: I...
~
Pechar, Emily Kathleen.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Depolarizing Environmental Policy: Identities and Public Opinion on the Environment.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Depolarizing Environmental Policy: Identities and Public Opinion on the Environment./
作者:
Pechar, Emily Kathleen.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:
203 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International80-12B.
標題:
Environmental Studies. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13806936
ISBN:
9781392195444
Depolarizing Environmental Policy: Identities and Public Opinion on the Environment.
Pechar, Emily Kathleen.
Depolarizing Environmental Policy: Identities and Public Opinion on the Environment.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 203 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2019.
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
High levels of partisan polarization on environmental policies, and on climate change in particular, have led to policy gridlock in the United States. While most Americans rely on their partisan identities to guide their policy preferences on highly polarizing issues, other non-partisan identities may also be relevant in informing environmental policy attitudes. This dissertation investigates the role that partisan and non-partisan identities play in driving attitudes on climate change and environmental policies broadly. In a first paper, I use a survey experiment to test how identity salience influences the effectiveness of a persuasive message about climate change. I find that priming a non-partisan (parental) identity decreases partisan polarization on climate change policy support, while priming a partisan identity increases polarization. In a second paper, I use focus groups, participant observation, and interviews to identify four strategies that individuals use to reconcile conflicting identities and form attitudes on climate change. In a third paper, I use focus groups with rural voters in North Carolina to understand how rural identities inform unique environmental policy preferences. Each of these studies contributes to the broader understanding of the role that non-partisan identities play in driving environmental attitudes and offers a potential way to build more bipartisan agreement in this policy area.
ISBN: 9781392195444Subjects--Topical Terms:
1669635
Environmental Studies.
Depolarizing Environmental Policy: Identities and Public Opinion on the Environment.
LDR
:02528nmm a2200337 4500
001
2264503
005
20200504070432.5
008
220629s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781392195444
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI13806936
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)duke:14984
035
$a
AAI13806936
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Pechar, Emily Kathleen.
$3
3541625
245
1 0
$a
Depolarizing Environmental Policy: Identities and Public Opinion on the Environment.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2019
300
$a
203 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
500
$a
Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500
$a
Advisor: Mayer, Frederick.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Duke University, 2019.
506
$a
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520
$a
High levels of partisan polarization on environmental policies, and on climate change in particular, have led to policy gridlock in the United States. While most Americans rely on their partisan identities to guide their policy preferences on highly polarizing issues, other non-partisan identities may also be relevant in informing environmental policy attitudes. This dissertation investigates the role that partisan and non-partisan identities play in driving attitudes on climate change and environmental policies broadly. In a first paper, I use a survey experiment to test how identity salience influences the effectiveness of a persuasive message about climate change. I find that priming a non-partisan (parental) identity decreases partisan polarization on climate change policy support, while priming a partisan identity increases polarization. In a second paper, I use focus groups, participant observation, and interviews to identify four strategies that individuals use to reconcile conflicting identities and form attitudes on climate change. In a third paper, I use focus groups with rural voters in North Carolina to understand how rural identities inform unique environmental policy preferences. Each of these studies contributes to the broader understanding of the role that non-partisan identities play in driving environmental attitudes and offers a potential way to build more bipartisan agreement in this policy area.
590
$a
School code: 0066.
650
4
$a
Environmental Studies.
$3
1669635
650
4
$a
Political science.
$3
528916
650
4
$a
Public policy.
$3
532803
690
$a
0477
690
$a
0615
690
$a
0630
710
2
$a
Duke University.
$b
Environmental Policy.
$3
3188771
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
80-12B.
790
$a
0066
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2019
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13806936
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9416737
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入