東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Adherence to STARD 2015 Reporting Re...

Fraga, Garth.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Adherence to STARD 2015 Reporting Recommendations in Pathology.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Adherence to STARD 2015 Reporting Recommendations in Pathology./
作者:	Fraga, Garth.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2020,
面頁冊數:	48 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International82-01.
標題:	Pathology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27958950
ISBN:	9798661735669

Adherence to STARD 2015 Reporting Recommendations in Pathology.
Fraga, Garth.

Adherence to STARD 2015 Reporting Recommendations in Pathology. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2020 - 48 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Kansas, 2020.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Diagnostic accuracy studies compare the performance of an index test against a reference standard test. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) is a checklist of items that should be reported in scientific studies to improve completeness and transparency. The primary objective of this project was to calculate the frequency of STARD items reported in diagnostic accuracy studies from the 2017-2018 pathology scientific literature. Two raters independently scored 171 articles for compliance in reporting 34 STARD items. There was excellent inter-rater reliability (Cohen Kappa coefficient = .8773). The mean number of STARD recommended items reported was 15.44 ± 3.59 with a range of 4-28 out of maximum possible score of 34. Excluding not-applicable items such as test-induced adverse events, overall adherence to STARD reporting recommendations was 50%. There was substantial variation in individual item reporting, with > 75% reporting of 8/34 items and < 25% reporting of 11/34 items. Less than 10% of the articles included pre-specified hypotheses, rationale for choice of the reference standard, subgroup analyses for confounding, sample size calculations, subject flow diagrams, time intervals and/or interventions between index and reference tests, adverse events caused by testing, study registration numbers, or links to full study protocols. Significantly more items were reported in articles from journals that encouraged STARD usage in their author guidelines (16.15 vs. 14.84, P = .0165). The frequency of STARD item reporting was independent of journal impact factor, article citation count, ICMJE reporting standards endorsement, anatomic/clinical pathology disciplines, and pathology subspecialty. These findings demonstrate variable compliance in the recent pathology scientific literature with STARD 2015 reporting recommendations. Mandating authors submit completed STARD checklists in the manuscript submission process might improve compliance.

ISBN: 9798661735669Subjects--Topical Terms:

643180
Pathology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Diagnostic test

Adherence to STARD 2015 Reporting Recommendations in Pathology.
LDR:03118nmm a2200361 4500 001 2232975
005 20210628081315.5
008 210928s2020 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798661735669
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI27958950
035 $a AAI27958950
035 $a 2232975
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Fraga, Garth. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-5567-0165 $3 3480571
245 1 0 $a Adherence to STARD 2015 Reporting Recommendations in Pathology.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2020
300 $a 48 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 82-01.
500 $a Advisor: Lai, Sue Min.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--University of Kansas, 2020.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Diagnostic accuracy studies compare the performance of an index test against a reference standard test. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) is a checklist of items that should be reported in scientific studies to improve completeness and transparency. The primary objective of this project was to calculate the frequency of STARD items reported in diagnostic accuracy studies from the 2017-2018 pathology scientific literature. Two raters independently scored 171 articles for compliance in reporting 34 STARD items. There was excellent inter-rater reliability (Cohen Kappa coefficient = .8773). The mean number of STARD recommended items reported was 15.44 ± 3.59 with a range of 4-28 out of maximum possible score of 34. Excluding not-applicable items such as test-induced adverse events, overall adherence to STARD reporting recommendations was 50%. There was substantial variation in individual item reporting, with > 75% reporting of 8/34 items and < 25% reporting of 11/34 items. Less than 10% of the articles included pre-specified hypotheses, rationale for choice of the reference standard, subgroup analyses for confounding, sample size calculations, subject flow diagrams, time intervals and/or interventions between index and reference tests, adverse events caused by testing, study registration numbers, or links to full study protocols. Significantly more items were reported in articles from journals that encouraged STARD usage in their author guidelines (16.15 vs. 14.84, P = .0165). The frequency of STARD item reporting was independent of journal impact factor, article citation count, ICMJE reporting standards endorsement, anatomic/clinical pathology disciplines, and pathology subspecialty. These findings demonstrate variable compliance in the recent pathology scientific literature with STARD 2015 reporting recommendations. Mandating authors submit completed STARD checklists in the manuscript submission process might improve compliance.
590 $a School code: 0099.
650 4 $a Pathology. $3 643180
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Library science. $3 539284
653 $a Diagnostic test
653 $a Reporting guidelines
653 $a Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD)
690 $a 0571
690 $a 0399
690 $a 0630
710 2 0 $a University of Kansas. $b Preventive Medicine and Public Health. $3 3480572
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 82-01.
790 $a 0099
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2020
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=27958950