東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

What is orientation in global thinki...

Flikschuh, Katrin.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

What is orientation in global thinking? = a Kantian inquiry /

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	What is orientation in global thinking?/ Katrin Flikschuh.
其他題名:	a Kantian inquiry /
作者:	Flikschuh, Katrin.
出版者:	Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, : 2017.,
面頁冊數:	xvi, 249 p. :digital ;24 cm.
附註:	Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Oct 2017).
內容註:	Machine generated contents note: 1. Conceptual loss in global political thinking; 2. On the moral necessity of states; 3. Non-individualist 'innate right'; 4. Re-orienting normative global thinking; 5. Progress without history; 6. Human rights for ancestors?; 7. The state as a failed universal; Conclusion.
標題:	Internationalism - Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511777264
ISBN:	9780511777264

What is orientation in global thinking? = a Kantian inquiry /
Flikschuh, Katrin.

What is orientation in global thinking?a Kantian inquiry /[electronic resource] :Katrin Flikschuh. - Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2017. - xvi, 249 p. :digital ;24 cm.

Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Oct 2017).

Machine generated contents note: 1. Conceptual loss in global political thinking; 2. On the moral necessity of states; 3. Non-individualist 'innate right'; 4. Re-orienting normative global thinking; 5. Progress without history; 6. Human rights for ancestors?; 7. The state as a failed universal; Conclusion.

Starting from Kant's striking question 'What is orientation in thinking?', this book argues that the main challenge facing global normative theorising lies in its failure to acknowledge its conceptual inadequacies. We do not know how to reason globally; instead, we tend to apply our domestic political experiences to the global context. Katrin Flikschuh argues that we must develop a form of global reasoning that is sensitive to the variability of contexts: rather than trying to identify a uniquely shareable set of substantive principles, we need to appreciate and understand local reasons for action. Her original and incisive study shows how such reasoning can benefit from the open-ended nature of Kant's systematic but non-dogmatic philosophical thinking, and from reorientation from a domestic to a non-domestic frame of thought. It will appeal to all those interested in global moral issues, as well as to Kant scholars.

ISBN: 9780511777264Subjects--Personal Names:

530976
Kant, Immanuel,
1724-1804.Subjects--Topical Terms:

3463610
Internationalism
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: JZ1308 / .F55 2017

Dewey Class. No.: 327.101

What is orientation in global thinking? = a Kantian inquiry /
LDR:02076nmm a2200265 a 4500 001 2223781
003 UkCbUP
005 20171027153138.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 210115s2017 enk o 1 0 eng d
020 $a 9780511777264 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9781107003811 $q (paper)
035 $a CR9780511777264
040 $a UkCbUP $b eng $c UkCbUP $d GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a JZ1308 $b .F55 2017
082 0 4 $a 327.101 $2 23
090 $a JZ1308 $b .F621 2017
100 1 $a Flikschuh, Katrin. $3 3463609
245 1 0 $a What is orientation in global thinking? $h [electronic resource] : $b a Kantian inquiry / $c Katrin Flikschuh.
260 $a Cambridge : $b Cambridge University Press, $c 2017.
300 $a xvi, 249 p. : $b digital ; $c 24 cm.
500 $a Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 24 Oct 2017).
505 8 $a Machine generated contents note: 1. Conceptual loss in global political thinking; 2. On the moral necessity of states; 3. Non-individualist 'innate right'; 4. Re-orienting normative global thinking; 5. Progress without history; 6. Human rights for ancestors?; 7. The state as a failed universal; Conclusion.
520 $a Starting from Kant's striking question 'What is orientation in thinking?', this book argues that the main challenge facing global normative theorising lies in its failure to acknowledge its conceptual inadequacies. We do not know how to reason globally; instead, we tend to apply our domestic political experiences to the global context. Katrin Flikschuh argues that we must develop a form of global reasoning that is sensitive to the variability of contexts: rather than trying to identify a uniquely shareable set of substantive principles, we need to appreciate and understand local reasons for action. Her original and incisive study shows how such reasoning can benefit from the open-ended nature of Kant's systematic but non-dogmatic philosophical thinking, and from reorientation from a domestic to a non-domestic frame of thought. It will appeal to all those interested in global moral issues, as well as to Kant scholars.
600 1 0 $a Kant, Immanuel, $d 1724-1804. $3 530976
650 0 $a Internationalism $x Philosophy. $3 3463610
650 0 $a Globalization $x Philosophy. $3 592514
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511777264