東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Science and human freedom

Esfeld, Michael.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Science and human freedom

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Science and human freedom/ by Michael Esfeld.
作者:	Esfeld, Michael.
出版者:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2020.,
面頁冊數:	xv, 189 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
內容註:	1.Matter in Motion: the scientific image of the world -- 2. How Science Explains: scientific explanations and their limits -- 3. Why the Mind Matters: the manifest image of the world.
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
標題:	Science - Philosophy. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37771-7
ISBN:	9783030377717

Science and human freedom
Esfeld, Michael.

Science and human freedom[electronic resource] /by Michael Esfeld. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2020. - xv, 189 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.

1.Matter in Motion: the scientific image of the world -- 2. How Science Explains: scientific explanations and their limits -- 3. Why the Mind Matters: the manifest image of the world.

This book argues for two claims: firstly, determinism in science does not infringe upon human free will because it is descriptive, not prescriptive, and secondly, the very formulation, testing and justification of scientific theories presupposes human free will and thereby persons as ontologically primitive. The argument against predetermination is broadly Humean, or more precisely 'Super-Humean', whereas that against naturalist reduction is in large Kantian, drawing from Sellars on the scientific and the manifest image. Thus, whilst the book defends scientific realism against the confusion between fact and fake, it also reveals why scientific theories, laws and explanations cannot succeed in imposing norms for our actions upon us, neither on the level of the individual nor on that of society. Esfeld makes a strong case for an ontology of science that is minimally sufficient to explain our scientific and common sense knowledge, not only removing the concern that the laws of nature are incompatible with human freedom, but furthermore showing how our freedom is in fact a very presupposition for science.

ISBN: 9783030377717

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-37771-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

523660
Science
--Philosophy.

LC Class. No.: Q175 / .E74 2020

Dewey Class. No.: 501

Science and human freedom
LDR:02229nmm a2200325 a 4500 001 2215910
003 DE-He213
005 20200706112125.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 201120s2020 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030377717 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030377700 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-37771-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-37771-7
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a Q175 $b .E74 2020
072 7 $a PDA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI075000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a PDA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 501 $2 23
090 $a Q175 $b .E75 2020
100 1 $a Esfeld, Michael. $3 782799
245 1 0 $a Science and human freedom $h [electronic resource] / $c by Michael Esfeld.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, $c 2020.
300 $a xv, 189 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a 1.Matter in Motion: the scientific image of the world -- 2. How Science Explains: scientific explanations and their limits -- 3. Why the Mind Matters: the manifest image of the world.
520 $a This book argues for two claims: firstly, determinism in science does not infringe upon human free will because it is descriptive, not prescriptive, and secondly, the very formulation, testing and justification of scientific theories presupposes human free will and thereby persons as ontologically primitive. The argument against predetermination is broadly Humean, or more precisely 'Super-Humean', whereas that against naturalist reduction is in large Kantian, drawing from Sellars on the scientific and the manifest image. Thus, whilst the book defends scientific realism against the confusion between fact and fake, it also reveals why scientific theories, laws and explanations cannot succeed in imposing norms for our actions upon us, neither on the level of the individual nor on that of society. Esfeld makes a strong case for an ontology of science that is minimally sufficient to explain our scientific and common sense knowledge, not only removing the concern that the laws of nature are incompatible with human freedom, but furthermore showing how our freedom is in fact a very presupposition for science.
650 0 $a Science $x Philosophy. $3 523660
650 0 $a Ontology. $3 530874
650 1 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 894954
650 2 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37771-7
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (Springer-41175)