東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

A Study of Faculty Members' Self-Rep...

Cicero, Brian Ray.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

A Study of Faculty Members' Self-Reported Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Psychological Capital.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A Study of Faculty Members' Self-Reported Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Psychological Capital./
作者:	Cicero, Brian Ray.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	251 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-03B.
標題:	Cultural Resources Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10930556
ISBN:	9780438326071

A Study of Faculty Members' Self-Reported Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Psychological Capital.
Cicero, Brian Ray.

A Study of Faculty Members' Self-Reported Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Psychological Capital. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 251 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Grand Canyon University, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

The purpose of this quantitative causal-comparative study investigated whether there were differences of faculty members cultural psychological capital and the four sub-components of cultural intelligence between the academic disciplines of STEM, humanities, social sciences, and applied sciences; which also served as the study's research questions. The theory of cultural intelligence and psychological capital served as the study's theoretical foundations. The Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS), Cross-Cultural PsyCap, and seven demographic questions were used to collect data from a sample of 153 faculty members at a university located in the central region of the United States and through social media. This study obtained a Cronbach's α of 0.83-0.92 for CQS and α = 0.99 for Cultural PsyCap, confirming the reliability. Due to a non-normal distribution, a Kruskal-Wallis H test analysis compared individual differences of each dependent variables between the independent variable. Results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference of metacognitive, motivational, behavioral cultural intelligence, and cultural PysCap between academic discipline; however, there was a statistically significance in cognitive CQ scores; median cognitive CQ scores were statistically significant between groups, χ2(3) = 8.547, p = .036. Subsequently, pairwise comparisons were performed with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. This post hoc analysis revealed a statistically significant difference of cognitive CQ between the academic disciplines of STEM (Mdn = 4.33) and humanities ( Mdn = 5.33) (p = .041). The results reflect the comparison against α = .05 and a p-value adjusted by the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.

ISBN: 9780438326071Subjects--Topical Terms:

1672692
Cultural Resources Management.

A Study of Faculty Members' Self-Reported Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Psychological Capital.
LDR:02872nmm a2200337 4500 001 2209156
005 20191025102844.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438326071
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10930556
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gcu:10799
035 $a AAI10930556
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Cicero, Brian Ray. $3 3436236
245 1 0 $a A Study of Faculty Members' Self-Reported Cultural Intelligence and Cultural Psychological Capital.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 251 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-03, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Sheppard, Tyler.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Grand Canyon University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a The purpose of this quantitative causal-comparative study investigated whether there were differences of faculty members cultural psychological capital and the four sub-components of cultural intelligence between the academic disciplines of STEM, humanities, social sciences, and applied sciences; which also served as the study's research questions. The theory of cultural intelligence and psychological capital served as the study's theoretical foundations. The Cultural Intelligence Scale (CQS), Cross-Cultural PsyCap, and seven demographic questions were used to collect data from a sample of 153 faculty members at a university located in the central region of the United States and through social media. This study obtained a Cronbach's α of 0.83-0.92 for CQS and α = 0.99 for Cultural PsyCap, confirming the reliability. Due to a non-normal distribution, a Kruskal-Wallis H test analysis compared individual differences of each dependent variables between the independent variable. Results indicated that there was no statistically significant difference of metacognitive, motivational, behavioral cultural intelligence, and cultural PysCap between academic discipline; however, there was a statistically significance in cognitive CQ scores; median cognitive CQ scores were statistically significant between groups, χ2(3) = 8.547, p = .036. Subsequently, pairwise comparisons were performed with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. This post hoc analysis revealed a statistically significant difference of cognitive CQ between the academic disciplines of STEM (Mdn = 4.33) and humanities ( Mdn = 5.33) (p = .041). The results reflect the comparison against α = .05 and a p-value adjusted by the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.
590 $a School code: 1582.
650 4 $a Cultural Resources Management. $3 1672692
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 641065
690 $a 0436
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0745
710 2 $a Grand Canyon University. $b Doctoral Studies. $3 2102896
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-03B.
790 $a 1582
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10930556