東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Attitudes about Acceptable Risk in t...

Offer-Westort, Thomas M.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Attitudes about Acceptable Risk in the Context of the Biodiversity Crisis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Attitudes about Acceptable Risk in the Context of the Biodiversity Crisis./
作者:	Offer-Westort, Thomas M.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	57 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International80-12.
標題:	Environmental philosophy. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13863464
ISBN:	9781392173589

Attitudes about Acceptable Risk in the Context of the Biodiversity Crisis.
Offer-Westort, Thomas M.

Attitudes about Acceptable Risk in the Context of the Biodiversity Crisis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 57 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12.

Thesis (M.S.)--Michigan Technological University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Crafting and enforcing conservation policy requires making normative judgements about what levels of risk are acceptable. These judgements include crucial decisions that impact which species qualify as "endangered." If a government's policies are going to represent the values of the public they govern, then public attitudes should be understood. Unfortunately, essentially nothing is known about public attitudes as they pertain to acceptable risk and the biodiversity crisis.My research aims to address this gap using data from an internet-based survey (n=1050). I focused on the Endangered Species Act of 1973 which defines an endangered species as "any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range." Because a species' risk of extinction increases with decreasing geographic range, the phrase "significant portion of its range" requires a judgement about what level of risk is acceptable. I then examined how the public's attitudes regarding risk differs both from the guidance provided by conservationists and the practices of government agencies.I also explored the extent to which variation in attitudes could be explained by relevant knowledge, social identity, level of education, personality, moral foundations, and numeracy. I then used structural equation modeling to model the relationships between predictors.

ISBN: 9781392173589Subjects--Topical Terms:

3168296
Environmental philosophy.

Attitudes about Acceptable Risk in the Context of the Biodiversity Crisis.
LDR:02467nmm a2200337 4500 001 2208876
005 20191025102433.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781392173589
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI13863464
035 $a (MiAaPQ)michigantech:11701
035 $a AAI13863464
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Offer-Westort, Thomas M. $3 3435940
245 1 0 $a Attitudes about Acceptable Risk in the Context of the Biodiversity Crisis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 57 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Vucetich, John;Veinott, Elizabeth.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Michigan Technological University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Crafting and enforcing conservation policy requires making normative judgements about what levels of risk are acceptable. These judgements include crucial decisions that impact which species qualify as "endangered." If a government's policies are going to represent the values of the public they govern, then public attitudes should be understood. Unfortunately, essentially nothing is known about public attitudes as they pertain to acceptable risk and the biodiversity crisis.My research aims to address this gap using data from an internet-based survey (n=1050). I focused on the Endangered Species Act of 1973 which defines an endangered species as "any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range." Because a species' risk of extinction increases with decreasing geographic range, the phrase "significant portion of its range" requires a judgement about what level of risk is acceptable. I then examined how the public's attitudes regarding risk differs both from the guidance provided by conservationists and the practices of government agencies.I also explored the extent to which variation in attitudes could be explained by relevant knowledge, social identity, level of education, personality, moral foundations, and numeracy. I then used structural equation modeling to model the relationships between predictors.
590 $a School code: 0129.
650 4 $a Environmental philosophy. $3 3168296
650 4 $a Environmental management. $3 535182
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 519075
690 $a 0392
690 $a 0474
690 $a 0621
710 2 $a Michigan Technological University. $b Cognitive and Learning Sciences. $3 3347129
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 80-12.
790 $a 0129
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13863464