東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

An Empirical Longitudinal Analysis o...

Bennett, Andrew L.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

An Empirical Longitudinal Analysis of Agile Methodologies and Firm Financial Performance.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	An Empirical Longitudinal Analysis of Agile Methodologies and Firm Financial Performance./
作者:	Bennett, Andrew L.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:	130 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-06B.
標題:	Management. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10982630
ISBN:	9780438710160

An Empirical Longitudinal Analysis of Agile Methodologies and Firm Financial Performance.
Bennett, Andrew L.

An Empirical Longitudinal Analysis of Agile Methodologies and Firm Financial Performance. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 130 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: B.

Thesis (D.Engr.)--The George Washington University, 2019.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Agile Software Development methods such as Scrum, SAFe, Kanban, and Large Scale Agile (LeSS) promise substantial benefits in terms of productivity, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, quality project management overhead, and time to market. As Agile methods have become widespread in the software development industry and begin to take root in the overall business community, there is an increasing need to understand the firm level impact of the implementation of these methods. To build the most effective business case for organizations in and out of the software development industry, it is imperative that a case be made to show that the implementation of Agile frameworks has constituted a competitive advantage. This study investigated the organization level performance impact of switching from traditional methods to the use of Agile frameworks. The results showed that changing from a traditional methodology to an Agile framework resulted in higher return on assets and lower operating expense ratios. The interaction between time and methodology for OER, ROA, or revenues in Table 6 did not show a significant difference, indicating that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. Thus, we cannot say whether performance differs as a function of type of agile methodology. That said, the non-parametric sign test shows that the median improvement in Operating Expense Ratios were highest for Scrum while SAFe seemed to show a slightly higher improvement in Return on Assets. On the whole, Scrum seems to outperform SAFe in terms of operating efficiency (as measured by OER) but lags in terms of ROA.

ISBN: 9780438710160Subjects--Topical Terms:

516664
Management.

An Empirical Longitudinal Analysis of Agile Methodologies and Firm Financial Performance.
LDR:02729nmm a2200337 4500 001 2208123
005 20190929184220.5
008 201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438710160
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10982630
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gwu:14480
035 $a AAI10982630
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Bennett, Andrew L. $3 3435136
245 1 3 $a An Empirical Longitudinal Analysis of Agile Methodologies and Firm Financial Performance.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2019
300 $a 130 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-06, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Etemadi, Amir.
502 $a Thesis (D.Engr.)--The George Washington University, 2019.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Agile Software Development methods such as Scrum, SAFe, Kanban, and Large Scale Agile (LeSS) promise substantial benefits in terms of productivity, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, quality project management overhead, and time to market. As Agile methods have become widespread in the software development industry and begin to take root in the overall business community, there is an increasing need to understand the firm level impact of the implementation of these methods. To build the most effective business case for organizations in and out of the software development industry, it is imperative that a case be made to show that the implementation of Agile frameworks has constituted a competitive advantage. This study investigated the organization level performance impact of switching from traditional methods to the use of Agile frameworks. The results showed that changing from a traditional methodology to an Agile framework resulted in higher return on assets and lower operating expense ratios. The interaction between time and methodology for OER, ROA, or revenues in Table 6 did not show a significant difference, indicating that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. Thus, we cannot say whether performance differs as a function of type of agile methodology. That said, the non-parametric sign test shows that the median improvement in Operating Expense Ratios were highest for Scrum while SAFe seemed to show a slightly higher improvement in Return on Assets. On the whole, Scrum seems to outperform SAFe in terms of operating efficiency (as measured by OER) but lags in terms of ROA.
590 $a School code: 0075.
650 4 $a Management. $3 516664
650 4 $a Information Technology. $3 1030799
650 4 $a Systems science. $3 3168411
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0489
690 $a 0790
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Systems Engineering. $3 1032058
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-06B.
790 $a 0075
791 $a D.Engr.
792 $a 2019
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10982630