語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
回圖書館首頁
手機版館藏查詢
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Root Biology and Physiology of Apple...
~
Lavely, Emily K.
FindBook
Google Book
Amazon
博客來
Root Biology and Physiology of Apple Trees as Affected by Fruit Removal.
紀錄類型:
書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Root Biology and Physiology of Apple Trees as Affected by Fruit Removal./
作者:
Lavely, Emily K.
出版者:
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2019,
面頁冊數:
158 p.
附註:
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertations Abstracts International80-12B.
標題:
Horticulture. -
電子資源:
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13917930
ISBN:
9781392318638
Root Biology and Physiology of Apple Trees as Affected by Fruit Removal.
Lavely, Emily K.
Root Biology and Physiology of Apple Trees as Affected by Fruit Removal.
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2019 - 158 p.
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2019.
In perennial horticultural crops, the balance between carbohydrate supply and demand is notable because of the high carbohydrate demand required for fruit development. Common management practices that manipulate aboveground growth such as fruit removal, are used to enhance fruit quality, return bloom, and ease of harvest. However, many of the underlying mechanisms behind above- and belowground physiological responses and effects on carbohydrate partitioning remain unknown. Moreover, although the fine root system is critical to water and nutrient acquisition, characterization of absorptive fine roots in mature woody plants is challenging.For apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.), crop load management with chemical thinners continues to be a challenge. Early season carbohydrate supply affects fruitlet competition and is assumed to influence efficacy of chemical thinners. The effect of carbohydrate reserves on early season glucose and starch concentrations and the response to chemical thinning were evaluated in mature 'Golden Delicious' apple trees on M.26, M.9, and G.16 rootstocks. In 2013, fruit removal at 29, 125, 154, and 182 days after full bloom was used to alter tree carbohydrate reserves (starch). In 2015, crop density of 2014 was used to alter tree carbohydrate reserves. In 2014, a water control and a chemical thinner of 0.95 L of Carbaryl 4L, 0.95 L Ultrafine oil, and Fruitone N (1-Napthaleneacetic acid) at 15 mg·L-1 in 379 L of water were applied to apple trees when fruitlets were 10 to 12 mm in diameter. In 2015, a water control and a chemical thinner of 0.95 L of Carbaryl 4L and Fruitone N (1-Napthaleneacetic acid) at 15 mg·L-1 in 379 L of water were applied to apple trees when fruitlets were 10 to 12 mm in diameter. In 2014 and 2015, shoots containing 1- and 2-year-old wood were sampled at different phenological stages from early spring dormancy to 10 days after thinner application to measure total nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations. Glucose and starch concentrations in December 2013 were not affected by fruit removal date, but total nonstructural carbohydrates declined from early spring dormancy to thinning time in 2014 and 2015. Fruit removal treatments in 2013 and crop density in 2014 had little effect on early season glucose and starch concentrations in 1- and 2-year-old wood in 2014 and 2015. In 2014, fruit set (fruit per 100 flower clusters) on non-thinned trees was positively and linearly related to glucose concentration in 2-year-old wood the day before thinning; however, fruit set on thinned trees was not related to early season glucose concentration. Fruit set was not related to early season starch concentration of 2-year-old wood across all sampling dates regardless of thinning. In 2015, fruit set was not related to glucose and starch concentrations at early season dormancy or thinning time regardless of thinning. Fruit set in 2015 was negatively and linearly related to crop density in 2014 for non-thinned and thinned trees.In addition to the high carbohydrate demand required for fruit development, apple trees allocate available carbohydrates for belowground processes such as nutrient foraging. Below-ground processes such as root production and nutrient foraging require energy to take up nutrients and to support interactions with beneficial microbes such as mycorrhizal fungi. To investigate how carbohydrate availability affected nutrient foraging of 'Golden Delicious' trees with or without fruit, fine root and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal growth was compared in unfertilized soil and localized nitrogen (N)-rich patches (containing inorganic or organic sources of N). Fruit removal enhanced root production compared to fruiting trees across all N treatments. For fruiting trees, roots proliferated more in the inorganic-N patch than in unfertilized soil or the organic-N patch. For non-fruiting trees, root proliferation was similar regardless of N addition. Arbuscular mycorrhizal extramatrical-hyphal biomass was not affected by fruit removal but was greater in the organic-N patch than in the inorganic-N patch or unfertilized soil. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization of apple roots was modestly affected by fruit removal and N treatments, and non-mycorrhizal fungal colonization was unaffected by treatments. Apple trees may manipulate root foraging strategies more than mycorrhizal foraging if carbohydrate availability is limited by fruiting.Fine roots of woody plants have traditionally been classified using an often arbitrary diameter cutoff approach, such as less than 2 mm. This approach, however, commonly includes both non-woody and woody roots. Alternatively, a functionally based root-order approach can be used to identify absorptive fine roots. The utility of this approach was examined for the horticultural fruit and nut crops: apple (Malus x domestica Borkh), peach (Prunus persica), grape (Vitus vinifera), almond (Prunus dulcis), and citrus (Citrus x clementina). In addition, variation in first- and second-order roots (most distal) was characterized for a wide range of woody horticultural species (33 in total), as diameter variation among species could influence the utility of a diameter cutoff approach, and because diameter has been strongly linked to root function. First-order roots of grape and first- and second-order roots of apple and peach were consistently thin, non-woody, mycorrhizal, and had high N:C ratios. In contrast, fourth and fifth order roots of grape and fifth order roots of apple and peach were woody, non-mycorrhizal, had low N:C ratios, and were thicker than lower order roots. Among the 33 horticultural species, diameter of first- and second-order roots varied about 15-fold, ranging from 0.04 to 0.60 mm and 0.05 to 0.89 mm respectively. The weakness of an arbitrary diameter approach is reflected in comparing, for example, first-order roots of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) and lemon (Citrus x limon L.), which had diameters as large as fourth-order roots of apple and peach. This research shows that root order characterization has considerably more utility than an arbitrary diameter approach in the identification of roots with different functions in perennial horticultural crops.
ISBN: 9781392318638Subjects--Topical Terms:
555447
Horticulture.
Root Biology and Physiology of Apple Trees as Affected by Fruit Removal.
LDR
:07236nmm a2200301 4500
001
2207742
005
20190920102413.5
008
201008s2019 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020
$a
9781392318638
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI13917930
035
$a
AAI13917930
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Lavely, Emily K.
$3
3434737
245
1 0
$a
Root Biology and Physiology of Apple Trees as Affected by Fruit Removal.
260
1
$a
Ann Arbor :
$b
ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,
$c
2019
300
$a
158 p.
500
$a
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-12, Section: B.
500
$a
Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500
$a
Advisor: Marini, Richard P.;Eissenstat, David M.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Pennsylvania State University, 2019.
520
$a
In perennial horticultural crops, the balance between carbohydrate supply and demand is notable because of the high carbohydrate demand required for fruit development. Common management practices that manipulate aboveground growth such as fruit removal, are used to enhance fruit quality, return bloom, and ease of harvest. However, many of the underlying mechanisms behind above- and belowground physiological responses and effects on carbohydrate partitioning remain unknown. Moreover, although the fine root system is critical to water and nutrient acquisition, characterization of absorptive fine roots in mature woody plants is challenging.For apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.), crop load management with chemical thinners continues to be a challenge. Early season carbohydrate supply affects fruitlet competition and is assumed to influence efficacy of chemical thinners. The effect of carbohydrate reserves on early season glucose and starch concentrations and the response to chemical thinning were evaluated in mature 'Golden Delicious' apple trees on M.26, M.9, and G.16 rootstocks. In 2013, fruit removal at 29, 125, 154, and 182 days after full bloom was used to alter tree carbohydrate reserves (starch). In 2015, crop density of 2014 was used to alter tree carbohydrate reserves. In 2014, a water control and a chemical thinner of 0.95 L of Carbaryl 4L, 0.95 L Ultrafine oil, and Fruitone N (1-Napthaleneacetic acid) at 15 mg·L-1 in 379 L of water were applied to apple trees when fruitlets were 10 to 12 mm in diameter. In 2015, a water control and a chemical thinner of 0.95 L of Carbaryl 4L and Fruitone N (1-Napthaleneacetic acid) at 15 mg·L-1 in 379 L of water were applied to apple trees when fruitlets were 10 to 12 mm in diameter. In 2014 and 2015, shoots containing 1- and 2-year-old wood were sampled at different phenological stages from early spring dormancy to 10 days after thinner application to measure total nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations. Glucose and starch concentrations in December 2013 were not affected by fruit removal date, but total nonstructural carbohydrates declined from early spring dormancy to thinning time in 2014 and 2015. Fruit removal treatments in 2013 and crop density in 2014 had little effect on early season glucose and starch concentrations in 1- and 2-year-old wood in 2014 and 2015. In 2014, fruit set (fruit per 100 flower clusters) on non-thinned trees was positively and linearly related to glucose concentration in 2-year-old wood the day before thinning; however, fruit set on thinned trees was not related to early season glucose concentration. Fruit set was not related to early season starch concentration of 2-year-old wood across all sampling dates regardless of thinning. In 2015, fruit set was not related to glucose and starch concentrations at early season dormancy or thinning time regardless of thinning. Fruit set in 2015 was negatively and linearly related to crop density in 2014 for non-thinned and thinned trees.In addition to the high carbohydrate demand required for fruit development, apple trees allocate available carbohydrates for belowground processes such as nutrient foraging. Below-ground processes such as root production and nutrient foraging require energy to take up nutrients and to support interactions with beneficial microbes such as mycorrhizal fungi. To investigate how carbohydrate availability affected nutrient foraging of 'Golden Delicious' trees with or without fruit, fine root and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal growth was compared in unfertilized soil and localized nitrogen (N)-rich patches (containing inorganic or organic sources of N). Fruit removal enhanced root production compared to fruiting trees across all N treatments. For fruiting trees, roots proliferated more in the inorganic-N patch than in unfertilized soil or the organic-N patch. For non-fruiting trees, root proliferation was similar regardless of N addition. Arbuscular mycorrhizal extramatrical-hyphal biomass was not affected by fruit removal but was greater in the organic-N patch than in the inorganic-N patch or unfertilized soil. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization of apple roots was modestly affected by fruit removal and N treatments, and non-mycorrhizal fungal colonization was unaffected by treatments. Apple trees may manipulate root foraging strategies more than mycorrhizal foraging if carbohydrate availability is limited by fruiting.Fine roots of woody plants have traditionally been classified using an often arbitrary diameter cutoff approach, such as less than 2 mm. This approach, however, commonly includes both non-woody and woody roots. Alternatively, a functionally based root-order approach can be used to identify absorptive fine roots. The utility of this approach was examined for the horticultural fruit and nut crops: apple (Malus x domestica Borkh), peach (Prunus persica), grape (Vitus vinifera), almond (Prunus dulcis), and citrus (Citrus x clementina). In addition, variation in first- and second-order roots (most distal) was characterized for a wide range of woody horticultural species (33 in total), as diameter variation among species could influence the utility of a diameter cutoff approach, and because diameter has been strongly linked to root function. First-order roots of grape and first- and second-order roots of apple and peach were consistently thin, non-woody, mycorrhizal, and had high N:C ratios. In contrast, fourth and fifth order roots of grape and fifth order roots of apple and peach were woody, non-mycorrhizal, had low N:C ratios, and were thicker than lower order roots. Among the 33 horticultural species, diameter of first- and second-order roots varied about 15-fold, ranging from 0.04 to 0.60 mm and 0.05 to 0.89 mm respectively. The weakness of an arbitrary diameter approach is reflected in comparing, for example, first-order roots of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) and lemon (Citrus x limon L.), which had diameters as large as fourth-order roots of apple and peach. This research shows that root order characterization has considerably more utility than an arbitrary diameter approach in the identification of roots with different functions in perennial horticultural crops.
590
$a
School code: 0176.
650
4
$a
Horticulture.
$3
555447
650
4
$a
Environmental management.
$3
535182
690
$a
0471
690
$a
0474
710
2
$a
The Pennsylvania State University.
$b
Plant Science.
$3
3434738
773
0
$t
Dissertations Abstracts International
$g
80-12B.
790
$a
0176
791
$a
Ph.D.
792
$a
2019
793
$a
English
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=13917930
筆 0 讀者評論
館藏地:
全部
電子資源
出版年:
卷號:
館藏
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
條碼號
典藏地名稱
館藏流通類別
資料類型
索書號
使用類型
借閱狀態
預約狀態
備註欄
附件
W9384291
電子資源
11.線上閱覽_V
電子書
EB
一般使用(Normal)
在架
0
1 筆 • 頁數 1 •
1
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館
處理中
...
變更密碼
登入