東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Causal independence and divine suppo...

Primus, Kristin Elizabeth Carlson.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Causal independence and divine support in Spinoza and Leibniz.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Causal independence and divine support in Spinoza and Leibniz./
作者:	Primus, Kristin Elizabeth Carlson.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2013,
面頁冊數:	186 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International75-05A.
標題:	Religion. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3597540
ISBN:	9781303456657

Causal independence and divine support in Spinoza and Leibniz.
Primus, Kristin Elizabeth Carlson.

Causal independence and divine support in Spinoza and Leibniz. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2013 - 186 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2013.

This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.

Most thinkers before the Enlightenment held that the created world must be continually sustained-as it were, continuously created by an omnipotent God who thereby maintains everything in existence. But if that is true, in what sense are created things genuinely real, genuinely distinct from God, and genuine productive causes of events in the world? This question occupied some of the best philosophical minds of the period, and seeing how those minds thought about the problem can reveal a lot about their views on causation, dependence relations, substance, and the extent to which theistic considerations inform and constrain theories about the workings of the natural world. In this dissertation, I focus on Spinoza and Leibniz, two philosophers for whom the problem of how to reconcile divine sustenance and creaturely activity raises special issues. Most discussions of the problem show up in metaphysical systems in which there is a transcendent God, and it has long been assumed that since Spinoza's system does not have such a God, he is not concerned to reconcile creatures' activity with their dependence on God for their being. I argue that Spinoza was concerned with a version of this problem, despite his monist metaphysics. In chapter one, I show how the Short Treatise contains arguments designed to resist the occasionalist conclusion that creatures are not genuine productive causes. In the second chapter, I argue that a concern with the nature and scope of divine causality persists into the Ethics, and that a recognition of this concern motivates a new interpretation of the metaphysics of causation in that book. In the third chapter, I turn to Leibniz, and argue that the view of divine and secondary causation he advocated in many of his post-1680s texts is not at all the kind of position previous commentators have assumed it was. I provide a model for the position and show how it allows him to reconcile the radical activity of created things with theological orthodoxy.

ISBN: 9781303456657Subjects--Topical Terms:

516493
Religion.

Causal independence and divine support in Spinoza and Leibniz.
LDR:03248nmm a2200373 4500 001 2206371
005 20190829083257.5
008 201008s2013 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781303456657
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3597540
035 $a (MiAaPQ)princeton:10679
035 $a AAI3597540
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Primus, Kristin Elizabeth Carlson. $3 3433267
245 1 0 $a Causal independence and divine support in Spinoza and Leibniz.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2013
300 $a 186 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 75-05, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Garber, Daniel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2013.
506 $a This item is not available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
506 $a This item must not be added to any third party search indexes.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Most thinkers before the Enlightenment held that the created world must be continually sustained-as it were, continuously created by an omnipotent God who thereby maintains everything in existence. But if that is true, in what sense are created things genuinely real, genuinely distinct from God, and genuine productive causes of events in the world? This question occupied some of the best philosophical minds of the period, and seeing how those minds thought about the problem can reveal a lot about their views on causation, dependence relations, substance, and the extent to which theistic considerations inform and constrain theories about the workings of the natural world. In this dissertation, I focus on Spinoza and Leibniz, two philosophers for whom the problem of how to reconcile divine sustenance and creaturely activity raises special issues. Most discussions of the problem show up in metaphysical systems in which there is a transcendent God, and it has long been assumed that since Spinoza's system does not have such a God, he is not concerned to reconcile creatures' activity with their dependence on God for their being. I argue that Spinoza was concerned with a version of this problem, despite his monist metaphysics. In chapter one, I show how the Short Treatise contains arguments designed to resist the occasionalist conclusion that creatures are not genuine productive causes. In the second chapter, I argue that a concern with the nature and scope of divine causality persists into the Ethics, and that a recognition of this concern motivates a new interpretation of the metaphysics of causation in that book. In the third chapter, I turn to Leibniz, and argue that the view of divine and secondary causation he advocated in many of his post-1680s texts is not at all the kind of position previous commentators have assumed it was. I provide a model for the position and show how it allows him to reconcile the radical activity of created things with theological orthodoxy.
590 $a School code: 0181.
650 4 $a Religion. $3 516493
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 516511
650 4 $a Metaphysics. $3 517082
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0322
690 $a 0396
690 $a 0422
710 2 $a Princeton University. $b Philosophy. $3 2101708
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 75-05A.
790 $a 0181
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2013
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3597540