東華大學圖書館 |

Documenting Gender Equity in Renaissance Anthologies: A Study of the Contemporary Anthologization of Early Modern Women Authors.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Documenting Gender Equity in Renaissance Anthologies: A Study of the Contemporary Anthologization of Early Modern Women Authors./
作者:	Al-Shara'h, Mais Nayel.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	173 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-02A.
標題:	Literature. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10842120
ISBN:	9780438278646

Documenting Gender Equity in Renaissance Anthologies: A Study of the Contemporary Anthologization of Early Modern Women Authors.
Al-Shara'h, Mais Nayel.

Documenting Gender Equity in Renaissance Anthologies: A Study of the Contemporary Anthologization of Early Modern Women Authors. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 173 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

This dissertation is devoted to the evolution of the inclusion of women's writing in the present-day literary canon of the English Renaissance and the influence of concerns about gender equity on the formation of contemporary anthologies of Renaissance literature. As a social principle, equity means equal access to a society's opportunities and resources, such as in schooling (Ferguson). The exclusion of women from writing, publishing, and otherwise participating in the literary tradition and its cultural advantages has been recognized as a central problem for some time in English studies, one that scholars have worked to redress. Lack of gender equity is particularly a problem in those literary traditions of earlier periods, when women were actively discouraged from gaining literacy and rarely granted access to publishing outlets for their writing. Such was the case during the Renaissance of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when male writers, like William Shakespeare, had more publishing rights and opportunities than their fellow female authors, like Virginia Woolf's posited "Judith Shakespeare," a figure who suggests that the Renaissance remains an important construction site for achieving contemporary ideals of gender equity. These inequalities have often been cemented by the modern textbooks used to teach literature, which feature mostly male authors. Moreover, textbooks of literature embody what John Guillory has called the "cultural capital" of the literary canon because, according to Guillory, "the school" is the primary location where literary canons are formed and perpetuated. Therefore, various critics and editors such as Barbara Pace and Paul Lauter have called for revision of the exclusively biased "textbook canon." Much revision of the traditional university literature curriculum with attention to racial and gender equity has been accomplished, primarily by recovering women and minority writers and by including in anthologies more representative selections of their work. In the field of Renaissance studies, various scholars have also answered this imperative (Callaghan), resulting in many changes in Renaissance literature anthologies. However, except for contemporary anthologies of Renaissance drama, which have been explored by Lopez and others, there has been little study of the contemporary formation of the textbook canon of Renaissance literature, which includes many genres other than plays. This inquiry is devoted to examining how gender equity has (or has not) been achieved in the contemporary textbook canon of Renaissance literature. In order to assess the various kinds of editorial interventions that have been performed regarding the anthologization of early modern women authors, I apply statistical models for anthologies from Pace, Kuipers, and others. Because the anthology was also a popular form of publication in the Renaissance, I detail the minimal presence of women authors in the earliest English Renaissance poetry collections, like Tottel's Miscellany (1557), and subsequent landmark collections like Palgrave's Golden Treasury (1861). My primary area of investigation, however, is the last several decades of the present, where I survey a range of Renaissance textbook anthologies published during this time. Some of these anthologies, like the Renaissance sections in The Norton Anthology of English Literature, are studied diachronically to reveal relevant changes across editions. Other anthologies are studied synchronically, grouping them by genre or theme. Within individual anthologies, I investigate such areas as the inclusions and exclusions of given authors and texts; the editorial organization, sourcing, presentation, and abridgment of selections; the role of editors' introductions, headnotes, and bibliographies; various anthology paratexts, such as dust jackets and marketing materials; and other relevant statistical proportions and related evidence that may suggest how contemporary editors and publishers have been motivated by concerns about gender equity. Necessary literary and cultural history also are referenced as needed, such as the differences between the period terms "Renaissance," "Elizabethan," and "early modern," when deployed in anthologies' titles. Regarding its theoretical methodology, this investigation is located at the intersection of two existing areas of literary study: the advocacy research of the "recovery movement" (the sector of contemporary canon studies devoted to recovering female authors and their works) and the cultural study of Anglo-American university textbooks, specifically the anthologies published as textbooks for college courses in literature. I employ a "mixed method" (combined qualitative/quantitative methodology) also known as "attending to the anthology's 'soft figures'" (Kuipers, "Contemporizing"). The effective starting point is the post-war period when canon-making relocated to the university, and the canon-making college textbook anthology first appeared. Of the dozens of published post-WWII anthologies of English Renaissance, I analyze altogether about 30, dividing them into four general categories based on three variables: relative size and market reach (number of selections, audience, sales figures, re-editions); gender inclusivity (male-only, mixed gender, female-only); and overall design. (Abstract shortened by ProQuest.).

ISBN: 9780438278646Subjects--Topical Terms:

537498
Literature.

Documenting Gender Equity in Renaissance Anthologies: A Study of the Contemporary Anthologization of Early Modern Women Authors.
LDR:06564nmm a2200337 4500 001 2205725
005 20190828135903.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438278646
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10842120
035 $a (MiAaPQ)iup:11768
035 $a AAI10842120
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Al-Shara'h, Mais Nayel. $3 3432596
245 1 0 $a Documenting Gender Equity in Renaissance Anthologies: A Study of the Contemporary Anthologization of Early Modern Women Authors.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 173 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-02, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Kuipers, Christopher M.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University of Pennsylvania, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a This dissertation is devoted to the evolution of the inclusion of women's writing in the present-day literary canon of the English Renaissance and the influence of concerns about gender equity on the formation of contemporary anthologies of Renaissance literature. As a social principle, equity means equal access to a society's opportunities and resources, such as in schooling (Ferguson). The exclusion of women from writing, publishing, and otherwise participating in the literary tradition and its cultural advantages has been recognized as a central problem for some time in English studies, one that scholars have worked to redress. Lack of gender equity is particularly a problem in those literary traditions of earlier periods, when women were actively discouraged from gaining literacy and rarely granted access to publishing outlets for their writing. Such was the case during the Renaissance of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, when male writers, like William Shakespeare, had more publishing rights and opportunities than their fellow female authors, like Virginia Woolf's posited "Judith Shakespeare," a figure who suggests that the Renaissance remains an important construction site for achieving contemporary ideals of gender equity. These inequalities have often been cemented by the modern textbooks used to teach literature, which feature mostly male authors. Moreover, textbooks of literature embody what John Guillory has called the "cultural capital" of the literary canon because, according to Guillory, "the school" is the primary location where literary canons are formed and perpetuated. Therefore, various critics and editors such as Barbara Pace and Paul Lauter have called for revision of the exclusively biased "textbook canon." Much revision of the traditional university literature curriculum with attention to racial and gender equity has been accomplished, primarily by recovering women and minority writers and by including in anthologies more representative selections of their work. In the field of Renaissance studies, various scholars have also answered this imperative (Callaghan), resulting in many changes in Renaissance literature anthologies. However, except for contemporary anthologies of Renaissance drama, which have been explored by Lopez and others, there has been little study of the contemporary formation of the textbook canon of Renaissance literature, which includes many genres other than plays. This inquiry is devoted to examining how gender equity has (or has not) been achieved in the contemporary textbook canon of Renaissance literature. In order to assess the various kinds of editorial interventions that have been performed regarding the anthologization of early modern women authors, I apply statistical models for anthologies from Pace, Kuipers, and others. Because the anthology was also a popular form of publication in the Renaissance, I detail the minimal presence of women authors in the earliest English Renaissance poetry collections, like Tottel's Miscellany (1557), and subsequent landmark collections like Palgrave's Golden Treasury (1861). My primary area of investigation, however, is the last several decades of the present, where I survey a range of Renaissance textbook anthologies published during this time. Some of these anthologies, like the Renaissance sections in The Norton Anthology of English Literature, are studied diachronically to reveal relevant changes across editions. Other anthologies are studied synchronically, grouping them by genre or theme. Within individual anthologies, I investigate such areas as the inclusions and exclusions of given authors and texts; the editorial organization, sourcing, presentation, and abridgment of selections; the role of editors' introductions, headnotes, and bibliographies; various anthology paratexts, such as dust jackets and marketing materials; and other relevant statistical proportions and related evidence that may suggest how contemporary editors and publishers have been motivated by concerns about gender equity. Necessary literary and cultural history also are referenced as needed, such as the differences between the period terms "Renaissance," "Elizabethan," and "early modern," when deployed in anthologies' titles. Regarding its theoretical methodology, this investigation is located at the intersection of two existing areas of literary study: the advocacy research of the "recovery movement" (the sector of contemporary canon studies devoted to recovering female authors and their works) and the cultural study of Anglo-American university textbooks, specifically the anthologies published as textbooks for college courses in literature. I employ a "mixed method" (combined qualitative/quantitative methodology) also known as "attending to the anthology's 'soft figures'" (Kuipers, "Contemporizing"). The effective starting point is the post-war period when canon-making relocated to the university, and the canon-making college textbook anthology first appeared. Of the dozens of published post-WWII anthologies of English Renaissance, I analyze altogether about 30, dividing them into four general categories based on three variables: relative size and market reach (number of selections, audience, sales figures, re-editions); gender inclusivity (male-only, mixed gender, female-only); and overall design. (Abstract shortened by ProQuest.).
590 $a School code: 0318.
650 4 $a Literature. $3 537498
650 4 $a Womens studies. $3 2122688
650 4 $a British & Irish literature. $3 3284317
690 $a 0401
690 $a 0453
690 $a 0593
710 2 $a Indiana University of Pennsylvania. $b English. $3 1026395
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-02A.
790 $a 0318
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10842120