東華大學圖書館 |

語系: 繁體中文

說明(常見問題)

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

登入

回首頁

切換: 標籤 | MARC模式 | ISBD

Evaluation of Machine Learning Techn...

Awaji, Mansour.

FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Identification of At-Risk Students.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Identification of At-Risk Students./
作者:	Awaji, Mansour.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2018,
面頁冊數:	133 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International80-05B.
標題:	Information Technology. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10981440
ISBN:	9780438688957

Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Identification of At-Risk Students.
Awaji, Mansour.

Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Identification of At-Risk Students. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2018 - 133 p.

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Nova Southeastern University, 2018.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Student attrition is one of the long-standing problems facing higher education institutions despite the extensive research that has been undertaken to address it. To increase students' success and retention rates, there is a need for early alert systems that facilitate the identification of at-risk students so that remedial measures may be taken in time to reduce the risk. However, incorporating ML predictive models into early warning systems face two main challenges: improving the accuracy of timely predictions and the generalizability of predictive models across on-campus and online courses. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate predictive models that can be applied to on-campus and online courses to predict at-risk students based on data collected from different stages of a course: start of the course, 4th week, 8th week, and 12th week. In this research, several supervised machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated on their performance. This study compared the performance of single classifiers (Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Naive Bayes, and Artificial Neural Networks) and ensemble classifiers (using bagging and boosting techniques). Their performance was evaluated in term of sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under Curve (AUC). A total of four experiments were conducted based on data collected from different stages of the course. In the first experiment, the classification algorithms were trained and evaluated based on data collected before the beginning of the semester. In the second experiment, the classification algorithms were trained and evaluated based on week-four data. Similarly, in the third and fourth experiments, the classification algorithms were trained and evaluated based on week-eight and week-12 data. The results demonstrated that ensemble classifiers were able to achieve the highest classification performance in all experiments. Additionally, the results of the generalizability analysis showed that the predictive models were able to attain a similar performance when used to classify on-campus and online students. Moreover, the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier was found to be the best performing classifier suited for the at-risk students' classification problem and was able to achieve an AUC of ≈ 0.89, a sensitivity of ≈ 0.81, and specificity of ≈ 0.81 using data available at the start of a course. Finally, the XGBoost classifier was able to improve by 1% for each subsequent four weeks dataset reaching an AUC of ≈ 0.92, a sensitivity of ≈ 0.84, and specificity of ≈ 0.84 by week 12. While the additional learning management system's (LMS) data helped in improving the prediction accuracy consistently as the course progresses, the improvement was marginal. Such findings suggest that the predictive models can be used to identify at-risk students even in courses that do not make significant use of LMS. The results of this research demonstrated the usefulness and effectiveness of ML techniques for early identification of at-risk students. Interestingly, it was found that fairly reliable predictions can be made at the start of the semester, which is significant in that help can be provided to at-risk students even before the course starts. Finally, it is hoped that the results of this study advance the understanding of the appropriateness and effectiveness of ML techniques when used for early identification of at-risk students.

ISBN: 9780438688957Subjects--Topical Terms:

1030799
Information Technology.

Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Identification of At-Risk Students.
LDR:04528nmm a2200313 4500 001 2205634
005 20190828120331.5
008 201008s2018 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9780438688957
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10981440
035 $a (MiAaPQ)scisnova:10525
035 $a AAI10981440
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Awaji, Mansour. $3 3432497
245 1 0 $a Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Early Identification of At-Risk Students.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2018
300 $a 133 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 80-05, Section: B.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Mukherjee, Sumitra.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Nova Southeastern University, 2018.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Student attrition is one of the long-standing problems facing higher education institutions despite the extensive research that has been undertaken to address it. To increase students' success and retention rates, there is a need for early alert systems that facilitate the identification of at-risk students so that remedial measures may be taken in time to reduce the risk. However, incorporating ML predictive models into early warning systems face two main challenges: improving the accuracy of timely predictions and the generalizability of predictive models across on-campus and online courses. The goal of this study was to develop and evaluate predictive models that can be applied to on-campus and online courses to predict at-risk students based on data collected from different stages of a course: start of the course, 4th week, 8th week, and 12th week. In this research, several supervised machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated on their performance. This study compared the performance of single classifiers (Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Naive Bayes, and Artificial Neural Networks) and ensemble classifiers (using bagging and boosting techniques). Their performance was evaluated in term of sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under Curve (AUC). A total of four experiments were conducted based on data collected from different stages of the course. In the first experiment, the classification algorithms were trained and evaluated based on data collected before the beginning of the semester. In the second experiment, the classification algorithms were trained and evaluated based on week-four data. Similarly, in the third and fourth experiments, the classification algorithms were trained and evaluated based on week-eight and week-12 data. The results demonstrated that ensemble classifiers were able to achieve the highest classification performance in all experiments. Additionally, the results of the generalizability analysis showed that the predictive models were able to attain a similar performance when used to classify on-campus and online students. Moreover, the Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier was found to be the best performing classifier suited for the at-risk students' classification problem and was able to achieve an AUC of ≈ 0.89, a sensitivity of ≈ 0.81, and specificity of ≈ 0.81 using data available at the start of a course. Finally, the XGBoost classifier was able to improve by 1% for each subsequent four weeks dataset reaching an AUC of ≈ 0.92, a sensitivity of ≈ 0.84, and specificity of ≈ 0.84 by week 12. While the additional learning management system's (LMS) data helped in improving the prediction accuracy consistently as the course progresses, the improvement was marginal. Such findings suggest that the predictive models can be used to identify at-risk students even in courses that do not make significant use of LMS. The results of this research demonstrated the usefulness and effectiveness of ML techniques for early identification of at-risk students. Interestingly, it was found that fairly reliable predictions can be made at the start of the semester, which is significant in that help can be provided to at-risk students even before the course starts. Finally, it is hoped that the results of this study advance the understanding of the appropriateness and effectiveness of ML techniques when used for early identification of at-risk students.
590 $a School code: 1191.
650 4 $a Information Technology. $3 1030799
690 $a 0489
710 2 $a Nova Southeastern University. $b Information Systems (DISS). $3 1023901
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 80-05B.
790 $a 1191
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2018
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10981440